Cargando…
Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
BreastCheck, the Irish National Breast Screening Programme, screens women aged 50–64. Radiographer recruitment has been a challenge; doubling of numbers is required for full national expansion; to date females are employed. The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and effect on return...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18506178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604385 |
_version_ | 1782155930645823488 |
---|---|
author | Fitzpatrick, P Winston, A Mooney, T |
author_facet | Fitzpatrick, P Winston, A Mooney, T |
author_sort | Fitzpatrick, P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BreastCheck, the Irish National Breast Screening Programme, screens women aged 50–64. Radiographer recruitment has been a challenge; doubling of numbers is required for full national expansion; to date females are employed. The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and effect on return for subsequent screening. In all 85.8% of a random sample of 2000 women recently screened by BreastCheck completed a postal questionnaire. The commonest reaction women felt they would have if there were a male radiographer was embarrassment; significantly greater among those attending a static unit (45.6%) than mobile (38.4%) and in younger women (46%) than older (38.7%). Nine per cent would not have proceeded if the radiographer was male and 9% would only have proceeded if female chaperone present. In all 17.5% (95% CI 15.7–19.4%) agreed that ‘If there were male radiographers I would not return for another screening appointment’; 18.3% were unsure. One-quarter agreed ‘if I heard there could be male radiographers it would change my opinion of BreastCheck for the worse’. The proportions agreeing with these statements did not vary significantly by screening unit type, age group, area of residence or insurance status. This is the largest published study to date of this important issue; the correct balance between equality and programme performance must be identified. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2410121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24101212009-09-10 Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake Fitzpatrick, P Winston, A Mooney, T Br J Cancer Clinical Study BreastCheck, the Irish National Breast Screening Programme, screens women aged 50–64. Radiographer recruitment has been a challenge; doubling of numbers is required for full national expansion; to date females are employed. The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and effect on return for subsequent screening. In all 85.8% of a random sample of 2000 women recently screened by BreastCheck completed a postal questionnaire. The commonest reaction women felt they would have if there were a male radiographer was embarrassment; significantly greater among those attending a static unit (45.6%) than mobile (38.4%) and in younger women (46%) than older (38.7%). Nine per cent would not have proceeded if the radiographer was male and 9% would only have proceeded if female chaperone present. In all 17.5% (95% CI 15.7–19.4%) agreed that ‘If there were male radiographers I would not return for another screening appointment’; 18.3% were unsure. One-quarter agreed ‘if I heard there could be male radiographers it would change my opinion of BreastCheck for the worse’. The proportions agreeing with these statements did not vary significantly by screening unit type, age group, area of residence or insurance status. This is the largest published study to date of this important issue; the correct balance between equality and programme performance must be identified. Nature Publishing Group 2008-06-03 2008-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2410121/ /pubmed/18506178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604385 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Fitzpatrick, P Winston, A Mooney, T Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
title | Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
title_full | Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
title_fullStr | Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
title_short | Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
title_sort | radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18506178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzpatrickp radiographergenderandbreastscreeninguptake AT winstona radiographergenderandbreastscreeninguptake AT mooneyt radiographergenderandbreastscreeninguptake |