Cargando…

Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake

BreastCheck, the Irish National Breast Screening Programme, screens women aged 50–64. Radiographer recruitment has been a challenge; doubling of numbers is required for full national expansion; to date females are employed. The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and effect on return...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, P, Winston, A, Mooney, T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18506178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604385
_version_ 1782155930645823488
author Fitzpatrick, P
Winston, A
Mooney, T
author_facet Fitzpatrick, P
Winston, A
Mooney, T
author_sort Fitzpatrick, P
collection PubMed
description BreastCheck, the Irish National Breast Screening Programme, screens women aged 50–64. Radiographer recruitment has been a challenge; doubling of numbers is required for full national expansion; to date females are employed. The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and effect on return for subsequent screening. In all 85.8% of a random sample of 2000 women recently screened by BreastCheck completed a postal questionnaire. The commonest reaction women felt they would have if there were a male radiographer was embarrassment; significantly greater among those attending a static unit (45.6%) than mobile (38.4%) and in younger women (46%) than older (38.7%). Nine per cent would not have proceeded if the radiographer was male and 9% would only have proceeded if female chaperone present. In all 17.5% (95% CI 15.7–19.4%) agreed that ‘If there were male radiographers I would not return for another screening appointment’; 18.3% were unsure. One-quarter agreed ‘if I heard there could be male radiographers it would change my opinion of BreastCheck for the worse’. The proportions agreeing with these statements did not vary significantly by screening unit type, age group, area of residence or insurance status. This is the largest published study to date of this important issue; the correct balance between equality and programme performance must be identified.
format Text
id pubmed-2410121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24101212009-09-10 Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake Fitzpatrick, P Winston, A Mooney, T Br J Cancer Clinical Study BreastCheck, the Irish National Breast Screening Programme, screens women aged 50–64. Radiographer recruitment has been a challenge; doubling of numbers is required for full national expansion; to date females are employed. The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and effect on return for subsequent screening. In all 85.8% of a random sample of 2000 women recently screened by BreastCheck completed a postal questionnaire. The commonest reaction women felt they would have if there were a male radiographer was embarrassment; significantly greater among those attending a static unit (45.6%) than mobile (38.4%) and in younger women (46%) than older (38.7%). Nine per cent would not have proceeded if the radiographer was male and 9% would only have proceeded if female chaperone present. In all 17.5% (95% CI 15.7–19.4%) agreed that ‘If there were male radiographers I would not return for another screening appointment’; 18.3% were unsure. One-quarter agreed ‘if I heard there could be male radiographers it would change my opinion of BreastCheck for the worse’. The proportions agreeing with these statements did not vary significantly by screening unit type, age group, area of residence or insurance status. This is the largest published study to date of this important issue; the correct balance between equality and programme performance must be identified. Nature Publishing Group 2008-06-03 2008-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2410121/ /pubmed/18506178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604385 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Fitzpatrick, P
Winston, A
Mooney, T
Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
title Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
title_full Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
title_fullStr Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
title_full_unstemmed Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
title_short Radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
title_sort radiographer gender and breast-screening uptake
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18506178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604385
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickp radiographergenderandbreastscreeninguptake
AT winstona radiographergenderandbreastscreeninguptake
AT mooneyt radiographergenderandbreastscreeninguptake