Cargando…

Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues

This paper systematically reviews the published economic research upon cancer genetics services for families at risk of having familial breast, ovarian or colorectal cancer. A structured search was made of 15 electronic databases. The search identified 1030 papers, of which 31 fulfilled the inclusio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffith, G L, Edwards, R T, Gray, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15150621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601792
_version_ 1782155968976519168
author Griffith, G L
Edwards, R T
Gray, J
author_facet Griffith, G L
Edwards, R T
Gray, J
author_sort Griffith, G L
collection PubMed
description This paper systematically reviews the published economic research upon cancer genetics services for families at risk of having familial breast, ovarian or colorectal cancer. A structured search was made of 15 electronic databases. The search identified 1030 papers, of which 31 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, two were cost–benefit studies, five were cost consequences, four were cost-effectiveness studies, one was a cost analysis, two were cost-minimisation studies, one was a cost–utility study, 10 modelled life years and six were reviews. Modelling studies indicate that surveillance, prophylactic and chemoprevention techniques extend survival for carriers of identified mutations. Genetic testing has been estimated to cost $70–2400 [£48(*)–1591] and genetic counselling $129–800 [£89–£551]. The technology of genetic testing has been found to be cost effective. Cost effectiveness was particularly influenced by targeting genetic services for patients with a strong family history of cancer rather than screening the entire population. Future economic evaluation must go beyond merely assessing health outcomes and mutation identification, and account for the impact of genetic services upon the individual, the family and society, establish the value of services to these groups and determine the most effective ways of delivering genetic services.
format Text
id pubmed-2410279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24102792009-09-10 Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues Griffith, G L Edwards, R T Gray, J Br J Cancer Review This paper systematically reviews the published economic research upon cancer genetics services for families at risk of having familial breast, ovarian or colorectal cancer. A structured search was made of 15 electronic databases. The search identified 1030 papers, of which 31 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, two were cost–benefit studies, five were cost consequences, four were cost-effectiveness studies, one was a cost analysis, two were cost-minimisation studies, one was a cost–utility study, 10 modelled life years and six were reviews. Modelling studies indicate that surveillance, prophylactic and chemoprevention techniques extend survival for carriers of identified mutations. Genetic testing has been estimated to cost $70–2400 [£48(*)–1591] and genetic counselling $129–800 [£89–£551]. The technology of genetic testing has been found to be cost effective. Cost effectiveness was particularly influenced by targeting genetic services for patients with a strong family history of cancer rather than screening the entire population. Future economic evaluation must go beyond merely assessing health outcomes and mutation identification, and account for the impact of genetic services upon the individual, the family and society, establish the value of services to these groups and determine the most effective ways of delivering genetic services. Nature Publishing Group 2004-05-04 2004-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2410279/ /pubmed/15150621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601792 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Griffith, G L
Edwards, R T
Gray, J
Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
title Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
title_full Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
title_fullStr Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
title_full_unstemmed Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
title_short Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
title_sort cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15150621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601792
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithgl cancergeneticsservicesasystematicreviewoftheeconomicevidenceandissues
AT edwardsrt cancergeneticsservicesasystematicreviewoftheeconomicevidenceandissues
AT grayj cancergeneticsservicesasystematicreviewoftheeconomicevidenceandissues