Cargando…

Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting

The conventional method to collect data on the health, nutrition, and food security status of a population affected by an emergency is a 30 × 30 cluster survey. This sampling method can be time and resource intensive and, accordingly, may not be the most appropriate one when data are needed rapidly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deitchler, Megan, Deconinck, Hedwig, Bergeron, Gilles
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2412846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18454866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-6
_version_ 1782155977320038400
author Deitchler, Megan
Deconinck, Hedwig
Bergeron, Gilles
author_facet Deitchler, Megan
Deconinck, Hedwig
Bergeron, Gilles
author_sort Deitchler, Megan
collection PubMed
description The conventional method to collect data on the health, nutrition, and food security status of a population affected by an emergency is a 30 × 30 cluster survey. This sampling method can be time and resource intensive and, accordingly, may not be the most appropriate one when data are needed rapidly for decision making. In this study, we compare the precision, time and cost of the 30 × 30 cluster survey with two alternative sampling designs: a 33 × 6 cluster design (33 clusters, 6 observations per cluster) and a 67 × 3 cluster design (67 clusters, 3 observations per cluster). Data for each sampling design were collected concurrently in West Darfur, Sudan in September-October 2005 in an emergency setting. Results of the study show the 30 × 30 design to provide more precise results (i.e. narrower 95% confidence intervals) than the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 design for most child-level indicators. Exceptions are indicators of immunization and vitamin A capsule supplementation coverage which show a high intra-cluster correlation. Although the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs provide wider confidence intervals than the 30 × 30 design for child anthropometric indicators, the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs provide the opportunity to conduct a LQAS hypothesis test to detect whether or not a critical threshold of global acute malnutrition prevalence has been exceeded, whereas the 30 × 30 design does not. For the household-level indicators tested in this study, the 67 × 3 design provides the most precise results. However, our results show that neither the 33 × 6 nor the 67 × 3 design are appropriate for assessing indicators of mortality. In this field application, data collection for the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs required substantially less time and cost than that required for the 30 × 30 design. The findings of this study suggest the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs can provide useful time- and resource-saving alternatives to the 30 × 30 method of data collection in emergency settings.
format Text
id pubmed-2412846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24128462008-06-05 Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting Deitchler, Megan Deconinck, Hedwig Bergeron, Gilles Emerg Themes Epidemiol Methodology The conventional method to collect data on the health, nutrition, and food security status of a population affected by an emergency is a 30 × 30 cluster survey. This sampling method can be time and resource intensive and, accordingly, may not be the most appropriate one when data are needed rapidly for decision making. In this study, we compare the precision, time and cost of the 30 × 30 cluster survey with two alternative sampling designs: a 33 × 6 cluster design (33 clusters, 6 observations per cluster) and a 67 × 3 cluster design (67 clusters, 3 observations per cluster). Data for each sampling design were collected concurrently in West Darfur, Sudan in September-October 2005 in an emergency setting. Results of the study show the 30 × 30 design to provide more precise results (i.e. narrower 95% confidence intervals) than the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 design for most child-level indicators. Exceptions are indicators of immunization and vitamin A capsule supplementation coverage which show a high intra-cluster correlation. Although the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs provide wider confidence intervals than the 30 × 30 design for child anthropometric indicators, the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs provide the opportunity to conduct a LQAS hypothesis test to detect whether or not a critical threshold of global acute malnutrition prevalence has been exceeded, whereas the 30 × 30 design does not. For the household-level indicators tested in this study, the 67 × 3 design provides the most precise results. However, our results show that neither the 33 × 6 nor the 67 × 3 design are appropriate for assessing indicators of mortality. In this field application, data collection for the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs required substantially less time and cost than that required for the 30 × 30 design. The findings of this study suggest the 33 × 6 and 67 × 3 designs can provide useful time- and resource-saving alternatives to the 30 × 30 method of data collection in emergency settings. BioMed Central 2008-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2412846/ /pubmed/18454866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-6 Text en Copyright © 2008 Deitchler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Deitchler, Megan
Deconinck, Hedwig
Bergeron, Gilles
Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
title Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
title_full Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
title_fullStr Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
title_full_unstemmed Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
title_short Precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
title_sort precision, time, and cost: a comparison of three sampling designs in an emergency setting
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2412846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18454866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-6
work_keys_str_mv AT deitchlermegan precisiontimeandcostacomparisonofthreesamplingdesignsinanemergencysetting
AT deconinckhedwig precisiontimeandcostacomparisonofthreesamplingdesignsinanemergencysetting
AT bergerongilles precisiontimeandcostacomparisonofthreesamplingdesignsinanemergencysetting