Cargando…

Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents

Most contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) stimulate the auditory nerve with trains of amplitude-modulated, symmetric biphasic pulses. Although both polarities of a pulse can depolarize the nerve fibers and generate action potentials, it remains unknown which of the two (positive or negative) phases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macherey, Olivier, Carlyon, Robert P., van Wieringen, Astrid, Deeks, John M., Wouters, Jan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2413083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18288537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-008-0112-4
_version_ 1782156010530537472
author Macherey, Olivier
Carlyon, Robert P.
van Wieringen, Astrid
Deeks, John M.
Wouters, Jan
author_facet Macherey, Olivier
Carlyon, Robert P.
van Wieringen, Astrid
Deeks, John M.
Wouters, Jan
author_sort Macherey, Olivier
collection PubMed
description Most contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) stimulate the auditory nerve with trains of amplitude-modulated, symmetric biphasic pulses. Although both polarities of a pulse can depolarize the nerve fibers and generate action potentials, it remains unknown which of the two (positive or negative) phases has the stronger effect. Understanding the effects of pulse polarity will help to optimize the stimulation protocols and to deliver the most relevant information to the implant listeners. Animal experiments have shown that cathodic (negative) current flows are more effective than anodic (positive) ones in eliciting neural responses, and this finding has motivated the development of novel speech-processing algorithms. In this study, we show electrophysiologically and psychophysically that the human auditory system exhibits the opposite pattern, being more sensitive to anodic stimulation. We measured electrically evoked compound action potentials in CI listeners for phase-separated pulses, allowing us to tease out the responses to each of the two opposite-polarity phases. At an equal stimulus level, the anodic phase yielded the larger response. Furthermore, a measure of psychophysical masking patterns revealed that this polarity difference was still present at higher levels of the auditory system and was therefore not solely due to antidromic propagation of the neural response. This finding may relate to a particular orientation of the nerve fibers relative to the electrode or to a substantial degeneration and demyelination of the peripheral processes. Potential applications to improve CI speech-processing strategies are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2413083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24130832008-11-25 Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents Macherey, Olivier Carlyon, Robert P. van Wieringen, Astrid Deeks, John M. Wouters, Jan J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Article Most contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) stimulate the auditory nerve with trains of amplitude-modulated, symmetric biphasic pulses. Although both polarities of a pulse can depolarize the nerve fibers and generate action potentials, it remains unknown which of the two (positive or negative) phases has the stronger effect. Understanding the effects of pulse polarity will help to optimize the stimulation protocols and to deliver the most relevant information to the implant listeners. Animal experiments have shown that cathodic (negative) current flows are more effective than anodic (positive) ones in eliciting neural responses, and this finding has motivated the development of novel speech-processing algorithms. In this study, we show electrophysiologically and psychophysically that the human auditory system exhibits the opposite pattern, being more sensitive to anodic stimulation. We measured electrically evoked compound action potentials in CI listeners for phase-separated pulses, allowing us to tease out the responses to each of the two opposite-polarity phases. At an equal stimulus level, the anodic phase yielded the larger response. Furthermore, a measure of psychophysical masking patterns revealed that this polarity difference was still present at higher levels of the auditory system and was therefore not solely due to antidromic propagation of the neural response. This finding may relate to a particular orientation of the nerve fibers relative to the electrode or to a substantial degeneration and demyelination of the peripheral processes. Potential applications to improve CI speech-processing strategies are discussed. Springer-Verlag 2008-02-21 2008-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2413083/ /pubmed/18288537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-008-0112-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Macherey, Olivier
Carlyon, Robert P.
van Wieringen, Astrid
Deeks, John M.
Wouters, Jan
Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents
title Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents
title_full Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents
title_fullStr Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents
title_full_unstemmed Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents
title_short Higher Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers to Positive Electrical Currents
title_sort higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2413083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18288537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-008-0112-4
work_keys_str_mv AT machereyolivier highersensitivityofhumanauditorynervefiberstopositiveelectricalcurrents
AT carlyonrobertp highersensitivityofhumanauditorynervefiberstopositiveelectricalcurrents
AT vanwieringenastrid highersensitivityofhumanauditorynervefiberstopositiveelectricalcurrents
AT deeksjohnm highersensitivityofhumanauditorynervefiberstopositiveelectricalcurrents
AT woutersjan highersensitivityofhumanauditorynervefiberstopositiveelectricalcurrents