Cargando…

Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members

BACKGROUND: Approval of the research proposal by an ethical review committee from both sponsoring and host countries is a generally agreed requirement in externally sponsored research. However, capacity for ethics review is not universal. Aim of this study was to identify opinions and views of the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sumathipala, Athula, Siribaddana, Sisira, Hewage, Suwin, Lekamwattage, Manura, Athukorale, Manjula, Siriwardhana, Chesmal, Murray, Joanna, Prince, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2413248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18489793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-9-10
_version_ 1782156040090943488
author Sumathipala, Athula
Siribaddana, Sisira
Hewage, Suwin
Lekamwattage, Manura
Athukorale, Manjula
Siriwardhana, Chesmal
Murray, Joanna
Prince, Martin
author_facet Sumathipala, Athula
Siribaddana, Sisira
Hewage, Suwin
Lekamwattage, Manura
Athukorale, Manjula
Siriwardhana, Chesmal
Murray, Joanna
Prince, Martin
author_sort Sumathipala, Athula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approval of the research proposal by an ethical review committee from both sponsoring and host countries is a generally agreed requirement in externally sponsored research. However, capacity for ethics review is not universal. Aim of this study was to identify opinions and views of the members serving in ethical review and ethics committees in Sri Lanka on informed consent, essential components in the information leaflet and the consent form. METHODS: We obtained ethical approval from UK and Sri Lanka. A series of consensus generation meetings on the protocol were conducted. A task oriented interview guide was developed. The interview was based on open-ended questionnaire. Then the participants were given a WHO checklist on informed consent and requested to rate the items on a three point scale ranging from extremely important to not important. RESULTS: Twenty-nine members from ethics committees participated. Majority of participants (23), believed a copy of the information leaflet and consent form, should accompany research proposal. Opinions about the items that should be included in the information leaflets varied. Participants identified 18 criteria as requirements in the information leaflet and 19 for the consent form. The majority, 20 (69%), believed that all research need ethical approval but identified limited human resource, time and inadequate capacity as constraints. Fifteen (52%) believed that written consent is not required for all research. Verbal consent emerged as an alternative to written consent. The majority of participants rated all components of the WHO checklist as important. CONCLUSION: The number of themes generated for the consent form (N = 18) is as many as for the information leaflet (N = 19) and had several overlaps. This suggests that the consent form should be itemized to reflect the contents covered in the information leaflet. The participants' opinion on components of the information leaflets and consent forms proved to be similar with WHO checklist on informed consent.
format Text
id pubmed-2413248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24132482008-06-06 Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members Sumathipala, Athula Siribaddana, Sisira Hewage, Suwin Lekamwattage, Manura Athukorale, Manjula Siriwardhana, Chesmal Murray, Joanna Prince, Martin BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Approval of the research proposal by an ethical review committee from both sponsoring and host countries is a generally agreed requirement in externally sponsored research. However, capacity for ethics review is not universal. Aim of this study was to identify opinions and views of the members serving in ethical review and ethics committees in Sri Lanka on informed consent, essential components in the information leaflet and the consent form. METHODS: We obtained ethical approval from UK and Sri Lanka. A series of consensus generation meetings on the protocol were conducted. A task oriented interview guide was developed. The interview was based on open-ended questionnaire. Then the participants were given a WHO checklist on informed consent and requested to rate the items on a three point scale ranging from extremely important to not important. RESULTS: Twenty-nine members from ethics committees participated. Majority of participants (23), believed a copy of the information leaflet and consent form, should accompany research proposal. Opinions about the items that should be included in the information leaflets varied. Participants identified 18 criteria as requirements in the information leaflet and 19 for the consent form. The majority, 20 (69%), believed that all research need ethical approval but identified limited human resource, time and inadequate capacity as constraints. Fifteen (52%) believed that written consent is not required for all research. Verbal consent emerged as an alternative to written consent. The majority of participants rated all components of the WHO checklist as important. CONCLUSION: The number of themes generated for the consent form (N = 18) is as many as for the information leaflet (N = 19) and had several overlaps. This suggests that the consent form should be itemized to reflect the contents covered in the information leaflet. The participants' opinion on components of the information leaflets and consent forms proved to be similar with WHO checklist on informed consent. BioMed Central 2008-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2413248/ /pubmed/18489793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-9-10 Text en Copyright © 2008 Sumathipala et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sumathipala, Athula
Siribaddana, Sisira
Hewage, Suwin
Lekamwattage, Manura
Athukorale, Manjula
Siriwardhana, Chesmal
Murray, Joanna
Prince, Martin
Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
title Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
title_full Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
title_fullStr Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
title_full_unstemmed Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
title_short Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
title_sort informed consent in sri lanka: a survey among ethics committee members
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2413248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18489793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-9-10
work_keys_str_mv AT sumathipalaathula informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT siribaddanasisira informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT hewagesuwin informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT lekamwattagemanura informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT athukoralemanjula informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT siriwardhanachesmal informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT murrayjoanna informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers
AT princemartin informedconsentinsrilankaasurveyamongethicscommitteemembers