Cargando…

A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets

BACKGROUND: Plotless density estimators are those that are based on distance measures rather than counts per unit area (quadrats or plots) to estimate the density of some usually stationary event, e.g. burrow openings, damage to plant stems, etc. These estimators typically use distance measures betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Neil A, Engeman, Richard M, Sugihara, Robert T, Krupa, Heather W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2422836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-6
_version_ 1782156077972848640
author White, Neil A
Engeman, Richard M
Sugihara, Robert T
Krupa, Heather W
author_facet White, Neil A
Engeman, Richard M
Sugihara, Robert T
Krupa, Heather W
author_sort White, Neil A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plotless density estimators are those that are based on distance measures rather than counts per unit area (quadrats or plots) to estimate the density of some usually stationary event, e.g. burrow openings, damage to plant stems, etc. These estimators typically use distance measures between events and from random points to events to derive an estimate of density. The error and bias of these estimators for the various spatial patterns found in nature have been examined using simulated populations only. In this study we investigated eight plotless density estimators to determine which were robust across a wide range of data sets from fully mapped field sites. They covered a wide range of situations including animal damage to rice and corn, nest locations, active rodent burrows and distribution of plants. Monte Carlo simulations were applied to sample the data sets, and in all cases the error of the estimate (measured as relative root mean square error) was reduced with increasing sample size. The method of calculation and ease of use in the field were also used to judge the usefulness of the estimator. Estimators were evaluated in their original published forms, although the variable area transect (VAT) and ordered distance methods have been the subjects of optimization studies. RESULTS: An estimator that was a compound of three basic distance estimators was found to be robust across all spatial patterns for sample sizes of 25 or greater. The same field methodology can be used either with the basic distance formula or the formula used with the Kendall-Moran estimator in which case a reduction in error may be gained for sample sizes less than 25, however, there is no improvement for larger sample sizes. The variable area transect (VAT) method performed moderately well, is easy to use in the field, and its calculations easy to undertake. CONCLUSION: Plotless density estimators can provide an estimate of density in situations where it would not be practical to layout a plot or quadrat and can in many cases reduce the workload in the field.
format Text
id pubmed-2422836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24228362008-06-09 A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets White, Neil A Engeman, Richard M Sugihara, Robert T Krupa, Heather W BMC Ecol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Plotless density estimators are those that are based on distance measures rather than counts per unit area (quadrats or plots) to estimate the density of some usually stationary event, e.g. burrow openings, damage to plant stems, etc. These estimators typically use distance measures between events and from random points to events to derive an estimate of density. The error and bias of these estimators for the various spatial patterns found in nature have been examined using simulated populations only. In this study we investigated eight plotless density estimators to determine which were robust across a wide range of data sets from fully mapped field sites. They covered a wide range of situations including animal damage to rice and corn, nest locations, active rodent burrows and distribution of plants. Monte Carlo simulations were applied to sample the data sets, and in all cases the error of the estimate (measured as relative root mean square error) was reduced with increasing sample size. The method of calculation and ease of use in the field were also used to judge the usefulness of the estimator. Estimators were evaluated in their original published forms, although the variable area transect (VAT) and ordered distance methods have been the subjects of optimization studies. RESULTS: An estimator that was a compound of three basic distance estimators was found to be robust across all spatial patterns for sample sizes of 25 or greater. The same field methodology can be used either with the basic distance formula or the formula used with the Kendall-Moran estimator in which case a reduction in error may be gained for sample sizes less than 25, however, there is no improvement for larger sample sizes. The variable area transect (VAT) method performed moderately well, is easy to use in the field, and its calculations easy to undertake. CONCLUSION: Plotless density estimators can provide an estimate of density in situations where it would not be practical to layout a plot or quadrat and can in many cases reduce the workload in the field. BioMed Central 2008-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2422836/ /pubmed/18416853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-6 Text en Copyright © 2008 White et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
White, Neil A
Engeman, Richard M
Sugihara, Robert T
Krupa, Heather W
A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
title A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
title_full A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
title_fullStr A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
title_short A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
title_sort comparison of plotless density estimators using monte carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2422836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-6
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteneila acomparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT engemanrichardm acomparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT sugihararobertt acomparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT krupaheatherw acomparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT whiteneila comparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT engemanrichardm comparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT sugihararobertt comparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets
AT krupaheatherw comparisonofplotlessdensityestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationontotallyenumeratedfielddatasets