Cargando…
The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines
BACKGROUND: As abnormal growth might be the first manifestation of undetected diseases, it is important to have accurate referral criteria and a proper diagnostic work-up. In the present paper we evaluate the diagnostic work-up in secondary health care according to existing consensus guidelines and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2422838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18477383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-21 |
_version_ | 1782156078538031104 |
---|---|
author | Grote, Floor K Oostdijk, Wilma De Muinck Keizer-Schrama, Sabine MPF van Dommelen, Paula van Buuren, Stef Dekker, Friedo W Ketel, Arnoldus G Moll, Henriette A Wit, Jan M |
author_facet | Grote, Floor K Oostdijk, Wilma De Muinck Keizer-Schrama, Sabine MPF van Dommelen, Paula van Buuren, Stef Dekker, Friedo W Ketel, Arnoldus G Moll, Henriette A Wit, Jan M |
author_sort | Grote, Floor K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As abnormal growth might be the first manifestation of undetected diseases, it is important to have accurate referral criteria and a proper diagnostic work-up. In the present paper we evaluate the diagnostic work-up in secondary health care according to existing consensus guidelines and study the frequency of underlying medical disorders. METHODS: Data on growth and additional diagnostic procedures were collected from medical records of new patients referred for short stature to the outpatient clinics of the general paediatric departments of two hospitals (Erasmus MC – Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam and Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem) between January 1998 and December 2002. As the Dutch Consensus Guideline (DCG) is the only guideline addressing referral criteria as well as diagnostic work-up, the analyses were based on its seven auxological referral criteria to determine the characteristics of children who are incorrectly referred and the adequacy of workup of those who are referred. RESULTS: Twenty four percent of children older than 3 years were inappropriately referred (NCR). Of the correctly referred children 74–88% were short corrected for parental height, 40–61% had a height SDS <-2.5 and 21% showed height deflection (Δ HSDS < -0.25/yr or Δ HSDS < -1). In none of the children a complete detailed routine diagnostic work up was performed and in more than 30% no routine laboratory examination was done at all. Pathologic causes of short stature were found in 27 children (5%). CONCLUSION: Existing guidelines for workup of children with suspected growth failure are poorly implemented. Although poorly implemented the DCG detects at least 5% pathologic causes of growth failure in children referred for short stature. New guidelines for referral are required with a better sensitivity and specificity, wherein distance to target height should get more attention. The general diagnostic work up for short stature should include testing for celiac disease in all children and for Turner syndrome in girls. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2422838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24228382008-06-07 The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines Grote, Floor K Oostdijk, Wilma De Muinck Keizer-Schrama, Sabine MPF van Dommelen, Paula van Buuren, Stef Dekker, Friedo W Ketel, Arnoldus G Moll, Henriette A Wit, Jan M BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: As abnormal growth might be the first manifestation of undetected diseases, it is important to have accurate referral criteria and a proper diagnostic work-up. In the present paper we evaluate the diagnostic work-up in secondary health care according to existing consensus guidelines and study the frequency of underlying medical disorders. METHODS: Data on growth and additional diagnostic procedures were collected from medical records of new patients referred for short stature to the outpatient clinics of the general paediatric departments of two hospitals (Erasmus MC – Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam and Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem) between January 1998 and December 2002. As the Dutch Consensus Guideline (DCG) is the only guideline addressing referral criteria as well as diagnostic work-up, the analyses were based on its seven auxological referral criteria to determine the characteristics of children who are incorrectly referred and the adequacy of workup of those who are referred. RESULTS: Twenty four percent of children older than 3 years were inappropriately referred (NCR). Of the correctly referred children 74–88% were short corrected for parental height, 40–61% had a height SDS <-2.5 and 21% showed height deflection (Δ HSDS < -0.25/yr or Δ HSDS < -1). In none of the children a complete detailed routine diagnostic work up was performed and in more than 30% no routine laboratory examination was done at all. Pathologic causes of short stature were found in 27 children (5%). CONCLUSION: Existing guidelines for workup of children with suspected growth failure are poorly implemented. Although poorly implemented the DCG detects at least 5% pathologic causes of growth failure in children referred for short stature. New guidelines for referral are required with a better sensitivity and specificity, wherein distance to target height should get more attention. The general diagnostic work up for short stature should include testing for celiac disease in all children and for Turner syndrome in girls. BioMed Central 2008-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2422838/ /pubmed/18477383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-21 Text en Copyright © 2008 Grote et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grote, Floor K Oostdijk, Wilma De Muinck Keizer-Schrama, Sabine MPF van Dommelen, Paula van Buuren, Stef Dekker, Friedo W Ketel, Arnoldus G Moll, Henriette A Wit, Jan M The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines |
title | The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines |
title_full | The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines |
title_short | The diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; An evaluation of consensus guidelines |
title_sort | diagnostic work up of growth failure in secondary health care; an evaluation of consensus guidelines |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2422838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18477383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-8-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grotefloork thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT oostdijkwilma thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT demuinckkeizerschramasabinempf thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT vandommelenpaula thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT vanbuurenstef thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT dekkerfriedow thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT ketelarnoldusg thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT mollhenriettea thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT witjanm thediagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT grotefloork diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT oostdijkwilma diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT demuinckkeizerschramasabinempf diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT vandommelenpaula diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT vanbuurenstef diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT dekkerfriedow diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT ketelarnoldusg diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT mollhenriettea diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines AT witjanm diagnosticworkupofgrowthfailureinsecondaryhealthcareanevaluationofconsensusguidelines |