Cargando…
Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
The risk of superinfection following routine abdominal drainage after major surgery is debated. Especially in patients with malignant diseases and a compromised host defense, this might be a factor increasing morbidity and mortality. During a 3-year period (1986–1988) 41 patients operated on for mal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
1990
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2278924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/98437 |
_version_ | 1782156138468343808 |
---|---|
author | Andersson, Roland Jeppsson, Bengt Holmberg, Anna Bengmark, Stig |
author_facet | Andersson, Roland Jeppsson, Bengt Holmberg, Anna Bengmark, Stig |
author_sort | Andersson, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | The risk of superinfection following routine abdominal drainage after major surgery is debated. Especially in patients with malignant diseases and a compromised host defense, this might be a factor increasing morbidity and mortality. During a 3-year period (1986–1988) 41 patients operated on for malignant abdominal conditions received a peritoneal catheter connected to a subcutaneous portal inserted in order to participate in a trial on postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using 5- Fluorouracil. No abdominal drains were inserted. In 15 patients, the subcutaneous portal was used for evacuation of postoperative fluid accumulation within the abdomen. The mean age was 53 (range 41–70) years. Inserted catheters were used for drainage up to 14 days postoperatively. The daily amount of fluid drained varied from 20 to 2 000 ml with a mean of 610 ml/patient and day. One patient required removal of the catheter due to infection around the subcutaneous chamber. Otherwise, the catheter system was not associated with any other complications or complaints. One patient developed a postoperative left subphrenic abscess drained percutaneously by the guidance of ultrasonography, a complication that could not be attributed to the catheter system but merely to the major operation per se. An implantable device for peritoneal access thus also seem useful for drainage of postoperative fluid collection, as evaluated in this preliminary report. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2423593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1990 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24235932008-07-08 Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients Andersson, Roland Jeppsson, Bengt Holmberg, Anna Bengmark, Stig HPB Surg Research Article The risk of superinfection following routine abdominal drainage after major surgery is debated. Especially in patients with malignant diseases and a compromised host defense, this might be a factor increasing morbidity and mortality. During a 3-year period (1986–1988) 41 patients operated on for malignant abdominal conditions received a peritoneal catheter connected to a subcutaneous portal inserted in order to participate in a trial on postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using 5- Fluorouracil. No abdominal drains were inserted. In 15 patients, the subcutaneous portal was used for evacuation of postoperative fluid accumulation within the abdomen. The mean age was 53 (range 41–70) years. Inserted catheters were used for drainage up to 14 days postoperatively. The daily amount of fluid drained varied from 20 to 2 000 ml with a mean of 610 ml/patient and day. One patient required removal of the catheter due to infection around the subcutaneous chamber. Otherwise, the catheter system was not associated with any other complications or complaints. One patient developed a postoperative left subphrenic abscess drained percutaneously by the guidance of ultrasonography, a complication that could not be attributed to the catheter system but merely to the major operation per se. An implantable device for peritoneal access thus also seem useful for drainage of postoperative fluid collection, as evaluated in this preliminary report. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1990 /pmc/articles/PMC2423593/ /pubmed/2278924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/98437 Text en Copyright © 1990 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Andersson, Roland Jeppsson, Bengt Holmberg, Anna Bengmark, Stig Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients |
title | Implantable Drainage After Major
Abdominal Surgery in Compromised
Patients |
title_full | Implantable Drainage After Major
Abdominal Surgery in Compromised
Patients |
title_fullStr | Implantable Drainage After Major
Abdominal Surgery in Compromised
Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Implantable Drainage After Major
Abdominal Surgery in Compromised
Patients |
title_short | Implantable Drainage After Major
Abdominal Surgery in Compromised
Patients |
title_sort | implantable drainage after major
abdominal surgery in compromised
patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2278924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/98437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anderssonroland implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients AT jeppssonbengt implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients AT holmberganna implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients AT bengmarkstig implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients |