Cargando…

Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients

The risk of superinfection following routine abdominal drainage after major surgery is debated. Especially in patients with malignant diseases and a compromised host defense, this might be a factor increasing morbidity and mortality. During a 3-year period (1986–1988) 41 patients operated on for mal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Roland, Jeppsson, Bengt, Holmberg, Anna, Bengmark, Stig
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1990
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2278924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/98437
_version_ 1782156138468343808
author Andersson, Roland
Jeppsson, Bengt
Holmberg, Anna
Bengmark, Stig
author_facet Andersson, Roland
Jeppsson, Bengt
Holmberg, Anna
Bengmark, Stig
author_sort Andersson, Roland
collection PubMed
description The risk of superinfection following routine abdominal drainage after major surgery is debated. Especially in patients with malignant diseases and a compromised host defense, this might be a factor increasing morbidity and mortality. During a 3-year period (1986–1988) 41 patients operated on for malignant abdominal conditions received a peritoneal catheter connected to a subcutaneous portal inserted in order to participate in a trial on postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using 5- Fluorouracil. No abdominal drains were inserted. In 15 patients, the subcutaneous portal was used for evacuation of postoperative fluid accumulation within the abdomen. The mean age was 53 (range 41–70) years. Inserted catheters were used for drainage up to 14 days postoperatively. The daily amount of fluid drained varied from 20 to 2 000 ml with a mean of 610 ml/patient and day. One patient required removal of the catheter due to infection around the subcutaneous chamber. Otherwise, the catheter system was not associated with any other complications or complaints. One patient developed a postoperative left subphrenic abscess drained percutaneously by the guidance of ultrasonography, a complication that could not be attributed to the catheter system but merely to the major operation per se. An implantable device for peritoneal access thus also seem useful for drainage of postoperative fluid collection, as evaluated in this preliminary report.
format Text
id pubmed-2423593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1990
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24235932008-07-08 Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients Andersson, Roland Jeppsson, Bengt Holmberg, Anna Bengmark, Stig HPB Surg Research Article The risk of superinfection following routine abdominal drainage after major surgery is debated. Especially in patients with malignant diseases and a compromised host defense, this might be a factor increasing morbidity and mortality. During a 3-year period (1986–1988) 41 patients operated on for malignant abdominal conditions received a peritoneal catheter connected to a subcutaneous portal inserted in order to participate in a trial on postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using 5- Fluorouracil. No abdominal drains were inserted. In 15 patients, the subcutaneous portal was used for evacuation of postoperative fluid accumulation within the abdomen. The mean age was 53 (range 41–70) years. Inserted catheters were used for drainage up to 14 days postoperatively. The daily amount of fluid drained varied from 20 to 2 000 ml with a mean of 610 ml/patient and day. One patient required removal of the catheter due to infection around the subcutaneous chamber. Otherwise, the catheter system was not associated with any other complications or complaints. One patient developed a postoperative left subphrenic abscess drained percutaneously by the guidance of ultrasonography, a complication that could not be attributed to the catheter system but merely to the major operation per se. An implantable device for peritoneal access thus also seem useful for drainage of postoperative fluid collection, as evaluated in this preliminary report. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1990 /pmc/articles/PMC2423593/ /pubmed/2278924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/98437 Text en Copyright © 1990 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andersson, Roland
Jeppsson, Bengt
Holmberg, Anna
Bengmark, Stig
Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
title Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
title_full Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
title_fullStr Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
title_full_unstemmed Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
title_short Implantable Drainage After Major Abdominal Surgery in Compromised Patients
title_sort implantable drainage after major abdominal surgery in compromised patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2278924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/98437
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonroland implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients
AT jeppssonbengt implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients
AT holmberganna implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients
AT bengmarkstig implantabledrainageaftermajorabdominalsurgeryincompromisedpatients