Cargando…

The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation

We compared hemostatic changes during OLT and HLT after various periods of graft storage, to investigate whether the host liver in HLT protects the recipient from hemostatic deterioration induced by severe graft storage damage. In particular, the mechanism of fibrinolytic deterioration was investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakker, C. Minke, Blankensteijn, Jan D., Schlejen, Peter, Porte, Robert J., Gomes, Maria J., Lampe, Harald I. H., Stibbe, Jeanne, Terpstra, Onno T.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8204546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1994/27915
_version_ 1782156167599882240
author Bakker, C. Minke
Blankensteijn, Jan D.
Schlejen, Peter
Porte, Robert J.
Gomes, Maria J.
Lampe, Harald I. H.
Stibbe, Jeanne
Terpstra, Onno T.
author_facet Bakker, C. Minke
Blankensteijn, Jan D.
Schlejen, Peter
Porte, Robert J.
Gomes, Maria J.
Lampe, Harald I. H.
Stibbe, Jeanne
Terpstra, Onno T.
author_sort Bakker, C. Minke
collection PubMed
description We compared hemostatic changes during OLT and HLT after various periods of graft storage, to investigate whether the host liver in HLT protects the recipient from hemostatic deterioration induced by severe graft storage damage. In particular, the mechanism of fibrinolytic deterioration was investigated. The effect of prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) on these parameters was also studied. Material and Methods: 69 pigs underwent either OLT (N = 32) or HLT (N = 37) with a graft stored for 2 hr (N = 31), 24 hr (N = 16), 48 hr (N = 7), or 72 hr (N = 15). PGE(1) was given intravenously to both donor and recipient animals and was added to the preservation and flushing solutions. Fibrinolysis (euglobulin clot lysis time, t-PA activity and α(2)-antiplasmin) and coagulation parameters (activated partial thromboplasmin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and platelet count) were measured at several intervals during transplantation. Statistics: Univariate non-parametric tests were used for analysis of coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters. For the three main variables- i.e., the type of transplantation, the use of PGE(1), and the preservation time, multiple regression analysis was performed. Results: Fibrinolytic activity increased during the anhepatic period of OLT. Graft reperfusion was followed by a rise in t-PA in both OLT and HLT. In HLT, t-PA quickly returned to normal, whereas a continuous increase was found in OLT. The coagulation parameters, in turn, remained unchanged during the anhepatic period and deteriorated in OLT compared to HLT. The duration of graft storage was directly related to the severity of the hemostatic changes, although this effect was more apparent in OLT than in HLT. Conclusions: Changes in hemostasis are more pronounced in OLT than in HLT. This suggests that the host liver protects the recipient from the effects of graft storage damage, even after long preservation times. Early postreperfusion fibrinolytic activity was presumably due to t-PA release from the graft both in OLT and HLT. The further rise t-PA in OLT might be caused by the release of cytokines from the graft, that subsequently evoke endothelial t-PA release. In HLT, t-PA and cytokines may be cleared by the native liver. No positive or negative effect of PGE(1) on coagulation or fibrinolysis parameters was noticed.
format Text
id pubmed-2423708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24237082008-07-08 The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation Bakker, C. Minke Blankensteijn, Jan D. Schlejen, Peter Porte, Robert J. Gomes, Maria J. Lampe, Harald I. H. Stibbe, Jeanne Terpstra, Onno T. HPB Surg Research Article We compared hemostatic changes during OLT and HLT after various periods of graft storage, to investigate whether the host liver in HLT protects the recipient from hemostatic deterioration induced by severe graft storage damage. In particular, the mechanism of fibrinolytic deterioration was investigated. The effect of prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) on these parameters was also studied. Material and Methods: 69 pigs underwent either OLT (N = 32) or HLT (N = 37) with a graft stored for 2 hr (N = 31), 24 hr (N = 16), 48 hr (N = 7), or 72 hr (N = 15). PGE(1) was given intravenously to both donor and recipient animals and was added to the preservation and flushing solutions. Fibrinolysis (euglobulin clot lysis time, t-PA activity and α(2)-antiplasmin) and coagulation parameters (activated partial thromboplasmin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and platelet count) were measured at several intervals during transplantation. Statistics: Univariate non-parametric tests were used for analysis of coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters. For the three main variables- i.e., the type of transplantation, the use of PGE(1), and the preservation time, multiple regression analysis was performed. Results: Fibrinolytic activity increased during the anhepatic period of OLT. Graft reperfusion was followed by a rise in t-PA in both OLT and HLT. In HLT, t-PA quickly returned to normal, whereas a continuous increase was found in OLT. The coagulation parameters, in turn, remained unchanged during the anhepatic period and deteriorated in OLT compared to HLT. The duration of graft storage was directly related to the severity of the hemostatic changes, although this effect was more apparent in OLT than in HLT. Conclusions: Changes in hemostasis are more pronounced in OLT than in HLT. This suggests that the host liver protects the recipient from the effects of graft storage damage, even after long preservation times. Early postreperfusion fibrinolytic activity was presumably due to t-PA release from the graft both in OLT and HLT. The further rise t-PA in OLT might be caused by the release of cytokines from the graft, that subsequently evoke endothelial t-PA release. In HLT, t-PA and cytokines may be cleared by the native liver. No positive or negative effect of PGE(1) on coagulation or fibrinolysis parameters was noticed. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1994 /pmc/articles/PMC2423708/ /pubmed/8204546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1994/27915 Text en Copyright © 1994 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bakker, C. Minke
Blankensteijn, Jan D.
Schlejen, Peter
Porte, Robert J.
Gomes, Maria J.
Lampe, Harald I. H.
Stibbe, Jeanne
Terpstra, Onno T.
The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation
title The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation
title_full The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation
title_fullStr The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation
title_short The Effects of Long-Term Graft Preservation on Intraoperative Hemostatic Changes in Liver Transplantation
title_sort effects of long-term graft preservation on intraoperative hemostatic changes in liver transplantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8204546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1994/27915
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkercminke theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT blankensteijnjand theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT schlejenpeter theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT porterobertj theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT gomesmariaj theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT lampeharaldih theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT stibbejeanne theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT terpstraonnot theeffectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT bakkercminke effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT blankensteijnjand effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT schlejenpeter effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT porterobertj effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT gomesmariaj effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT lampeharaldih effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT stibbejeanne effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation
AT terpstraonnot effectsoflongtermgraftpreservationonintraoperativehemostaticchangesinlivertransplantation