Cargando…

Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?

Background: Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Since intensive nutritional support can reduce the catabolic response and improve protein synthesis and liver regeneration, we performed a prospective study to investigate whether perioperativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bothe, Albert, Steele, Glenn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9174865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/64648
_version_ 1782156197088985088
author Bothe, Albert
Steele, Glenn
author_facet Bothe, Albert
Steele, Glenn
author_sort Bothe, Albert
collection PubMed
description Background: Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Since intensive nutritional support can reduce the catabolic response and improve protein synthesis and liver regeneration, we performed a prospective study to investigate whether perioperative nutritional support could improve outcome in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: We studied 124 patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sixty-four patients (39 with cirrhosis, 18 with chronic active hepatitis, and 7 with no associated liver disease) were randomly assigned to receive perioperative intravenous nutritional support in addition to their oral diet, and 60 patients (33 with cirrhosis, 12 with chronic active hepatitis, and 15 with no associated liver disease) were randomly assigned to a control group. The perioperative nutritional therapy consisted of a solution enriched with 35 percent branched chain amino acids, dextrose, and lipid emulsion (50 percent medium-chain trigylcerides) given intravenously for 14 days perioperatively). Results: There was a reduction in the overall postoperative morbidity rate in the perioperative-nutrition group as compared with the control group (34 percent vs. 55 percent; relative risk, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.96), predominantly because of fewer septic complications (17 percent vs. 37 percent; relative risk, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.96). There were also a reduction in the requirement for diuretic agents to control ascites (25 percent vs. 50 percent; relative risk, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.87), less weight loss after hepatectomy (median loss, 0 kg vs. 1.4 kg; P=0.01), and less deterioration of liver function as measured by the change in the rate of clearance of indocyanine green (–2.8 percent vs. –4.8 percent at 20 minutes, P=0.05). These benefits were seen predominantly in the patients with underlying cirrhosis who underwent major hepatechtomy. There were five deaths during hospitalization in the perioperativenutrition group, and nine in the control group (P not significant). Conclusions: Perioperative nutritional support can reduce complications after major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2423856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24238562008-07-08 Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection? Bothe, Albert Steele, Glenn HPB Surg Research Article Background: Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Since intensive nutritional support can reduce the catabolic response and improve protein synthesis and liver regeneration, we performed a prospective study to investigate whether perioperative nutritional support could improve outcome in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: We studied 124 patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sixty-four patients (39 with cirrhosis, 18 with chronic active hepatitis, and 7 with no associated liver disease) were randomly assigned to receive perioperative intravenous nutritional support in addition to their oral diet, and 60 patients (33 with cirrhosis, 12 with chronic active hepatitis, and 15 with no associated liver disease) were randomly assigned to a control group. The perioperative nutritional therapy consisted of a solution enriched with 35 percent branched chain amino acids, dextrose, and lipid emulsion (50 percent medium-chain trigylcerides) given intravenously for 14 days perioperatively). Results: There was a reduction in the overall postoperative morbidity rate in the perioperative-nutrition group as compared with the control group (34 percent vs. 55 percent; relative risk, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.96), predominantly because of fewer septic complications (17 percent vs. 37 percent; relative risk, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.96). There were also a reduction in the requirement for diuretic agents to control ascites (25 percent vs. 50 percent; relative risk, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.87), less weight loss after hepatectomy (median loss, 0 kg vs. 1.4 kg; P=0.01), and less deterioration of liver function as measured by the change in the rate of clearance of indocyanine green (–2.8 percent vs. –4.8 percent at 20 minutes, P=0.05). These benefits were seen predominantly in the patients with underlying cirrhosis who underwent major hepatechtomy. There were five deaths during hospitalization in the perioperativenutrition group, and nine in the control group (P not significant). Conclusions: Perioperative nutritional support can reduce complications after major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2423856/ /pubmed/9174865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/64648 Text en Copyright © 1997 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bothe, Albert
Steele, Glenn
Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?
title Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?
title_full Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?
title_fullStr Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?
title_full_unstemmed Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?
title_short Is There a Role for Perioperative Nutritional Support in Liver Resection?
title_sort is there a role for perioperative nutritional support in liver resection?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9174865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/64648
work_keys_str_mv AT bothealbert istherearoleforperioperativenutritionalsupportinliverresection
AT steeleglenn istherearoleforperioperativenutritionalsupportinliverresection