Cargando…

Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?

Background: This study was aimed at evaluating advantages of distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) with splenopancreatic and gastric disconnection (DSRS-SPGD) over DSRS with splenopancreatic disconnection (DSRS-SPD) and standard DSRS (S-DSRS). Methods: DSRS-SPGD, DSRS-SPD, and S-DSRS were performed on 62,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Henderson, J. Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9174868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/26507
_version_ 1782156197614321664
author Henderson, J. Michael
author_facet Henderson, J. Michael
author_sort Henderson, J. Michael
collection PubMed
description Background: This study was aimed at evaluating advantages of distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) with splenopancreatic and gastric disconnection (DSRS-SPGD) over DSRS with splenopancreatic disconnection (DSRS-SPD) and standard DSRS (S-DSRS). Methods: DSRS-SPGD, DSRS-SPD, and S-DSRS were performed on 62, 7, and 55 patients, respectively, from 1970 to 1992. Comparison was performed in the following aspects: (1) long-term results in ratio of rebleeding, survival rate, and quality of life and (2) portal hemodynamics evaluated by preoperative and postoperative angiography. Portal blood flow was assessed by the ratio of the diameter of portal vein (PV) to superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and shunt selectivity was evaluated by selectivity grade. Results: Incidence of rebleeding was significantly lower in patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD than in those who underwent S-DSRS (p< 0.05). Grade 0 and I performance status was better in patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD. Accumulated survival ratio for 5 and 7 years was 78.3% and 70.5% in patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD, 59.7% and 44.1% in patients who underwent S-DSRS, and 75% and 75% in patients who underwent DSRS-SPD. Hemodynamic evaluation showed significantly lower PV/SMV ratio and degree of change in PV/SMV ratio of patients who underwent S-DSRS and DSRS-SPD. Many patients who underwent S-DSRS and DSRS-SPD exhibited loss of shunt selectivity at grades II and III. In contrast, patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD maintained satisfactory PV/SMV ratio and selectivity grade. Conclusions: DSRS-SPGD clearly showed advantages in decrease of rebleeding and improvement of quality of life resulting from maintenance of shunt selectivity and portal blood flow.
format Text
id pubmed-2423858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24238582008-07-08 Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection? Henderson, J. Michael HPB Surg Research Article Background: This study was aimed at evaluating advantages of distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) with splenopancreatic and gastric disconnection (DSRS-SPGD) over DSRS with splenopancreatic disconnection (DSRS-SPD) and standard DSRS (S-DSRS). Methods: DSRS-SPGD, DSRS-SPD, and S-DSRS were performed on 62, 7, and 55 patients, respectively, from 1970 to 1992. Comparison was performed in the following aspects: (1) long-term results in ratio of rebleeding, survival rate, and quality of life and (2) portal hemodynamics evaluated by preoperative and postoperative angiography. Portal blood flow was assessed by the ratio of the diameter of portal vein (PV) to superior mesenteric vein (SMV), and shunt selectivity was evaluated by selectivity grade. Results: Incidence of rebleeding was significantly lower in patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD than in those who underwent S-DSRS (p< 0.05). Grade 0 and I performance status was better in patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD. Accumulated survival ratio for 5 and 7 years was 78.3% and 70.5% in patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD, 59.7% and 44.1% in patients who underwent S-DSRS, and 75% and 75% in patients who underwent DSRS-SPD. Hemodynamic evaluation showed significantly lower PV/SMV ratio and degree of change in PV/SMV ratio of patients who underwent S-DSRS and DSRS-SPD. Many patients who underwent S-DSRS and DSRS-SPD exhibited loss of shunt selectivity at grades II and III. In contrast, patients who underwent DSRS-SPGD maintained satisfactory PV/SMV ratio and selectivity grade. Conclusions: DSRS-SPGD clearly showed advantages in decrease of rebleeding and improvement of quality of life resulting from maintenance of shunt selectivity and portal blood flow. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2423858/ /pubmed/9174868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/26507 Text en Copyright © 1997 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Henderson, J. Michael
Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?
title Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?
title_full Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?
title_fullStr Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?
title_full_unstemmed Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?
title_short Should the Distal Splenorenal Shunt be Combined with Gastric Disconection and Transection?
title_sort should the distal splenorenal shunt be combined with gastric disconection and transection?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9174868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/26507
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonjmichael shouldthedistalsplenorenalshuntbecombinedwithgastricdisconectionandtransection