Cargando…

Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt

Recurrent variceal bleeding in liver transplant candidates with end-stage liver disease can complicate or even prohibit a subsequent transplant procedure (OLT). Endoscopic sclero-therapy and medical therapy are considered as first-line management with surgical shunts reserved for refractory situatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faust, Thomas W., Sorrell, Michael F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/41536
_version_ 1782156200627929088
author Faust, Thomas W.
Sorrell, Michael F.
author_facet Faust, Thomas W.
Sorrell, Michael F.
author_sort Faust, Thomas W.
collection PubMed
description Recurrent variceal bleeding in liver transplant candidates with end-stage liver disease can complicate or even prohibit a subsequent transplant procedure (OLT). Endoscopic sclero-therapy and medical therapy are considered as first-line management with surgical shunts reserved for refractory situations. Surgical shunts can be associated with a high mortality in this population and may complicate subsequent OLT. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been recommended in these patients as a bridge to OLT. This is a new modality that has not been compared with previously established therapies such as the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS). In this study we report our experience with 35 liver transplant recipients who had a previous TIPS (18 patients) or DSRS (17 patients) for variceal bleeding. The TIPS group had a significantly larger proportion of critically ill and Child-Pugh C patients. Mean operating time was more prolonged in the DSRS group (P=0.014) but transfusion requirements were similar. Intraoperative portal vein blood flow measurements averaged 2132±725 ml/min in the TIPS group compared with 1120±351ml/min in the DSRS group (P<0.001). Arterial flows were similar. Mean ICU and hospital stays were similar. There were 3 hospital mortalities in the DSRS group and none in the TIPS group (P=0.1). We conclude that TIPS is a valuable tool in the management of recurrent variceal bleeding prior to liver transplantation. Intra0Perative hemodynamic measurements suggest a theoretical advantage with TIPS. In a group of patients with advanced liver disease we report an outcome that is similar to patients treated with DSRS prior to liver transplantation. The role of TIPS in the treatment of nontransplant candidates remains to be clarified.
format Text
id pubmed-2423876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24238762008-07-08 Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt Faust, Thomas W. Sorrell, Michael F. HPB Surg Research Article Recurrent variceal bleeding in liver transplant candidates with end-stage liver disease can complicate or even prohibit a subsequent transplant procedure (OLT). Endoscopic sclero-therapy and medical therapy are considered as first-line management with surgical shunts reserved for refractory situations. Surgical shunts can be associated with a high mortality in this population and may complicate subsequent OLT. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been recommended in these patients as a bridge to OLT. This is a new modality that has not been compared with previously established therapies such as the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS). In this study we report our experience with 35 liver transplant recipients who had a previous TIPS (18 patients) or DSRS (17 patients) for variceal bleeding. The TIPS group had a significantly larger proportion of critically ill and Child-Pugh C patients. Mean operating time was more prolonged in the DSRS group (P=0.014) but transfusion requirements were similar. Intraoperative portal vein blood flow measurements averaged 2132±725 ml/min in the TIPS group compared with 1120±351ml/min in the DSRS group (P<0.001). Arterial flows were similar. Mean ICU and hospital stays were similar. There were 3 hospital mortalities in the DSRS group and none in the TIPS group (P=0.1). We conclude that TIPS is a valuable tool in the management of recurrent variceal bleeding prior to liver transplantation. Intra0Perative hemodynamic measurements suggest a theoretical advantage with TIPS. In a group of patients with advanced liver disease we report an outcome that is similar to patients treated with DSRS prior to liver transplantation. The role of TIPS in the treatment of nontransplant candidates remains to be clarified. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2423876/ /pubmed/9184884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/41536 Text en Copyright © 1997 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Faust, Thomas W.
Sorrell, Michael F.
Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt
title Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt
title_full Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt
title_fullStr Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt
title_full_unstemmed Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt
title_short Pre-Liver Transplant: Tips Versus Distal Splenorenal Shunt
title_sort pre-liver transplant: tips versus distal splenorenal shunt
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2423876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9184884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/41536
work_keys_str_mv AT faustthomasw prelivertransplanttipsversusdistalsplenorenalshunt
AT sorrellmichaelf prelivertransplanttipsversusdistalsplenorenalshunt