Cargando…

Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications

Background Faced with a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy the surgeon may feel that conversion to open operation would risk greater complications because of the laparotomy. Information on the effect of conversion is lacking. The purpose of this study is to measure the complications of laparosco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, M. H., Benger, J. R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2424007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10977115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/56760
_version_ 1782156231353303040
author Thompson, M. H.
Benger, J. R.
author_facet Thompson, M. H.
Benger, J. R.
author_sort Thompson, M. H.
collection PubMed
description Background Faced with a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy the surgeon may feel that conversion to open operation would risk greater complications because of the laparotomy. Information on the effect of conversion is lacking. The purpose of this study is to measure the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and observe the effect of the conversion rate. Methods A total of 957 patients were studied. There were three consecutive series of patients; the first undergoing open cholecystectomy (384 patients), the second laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a 5.8% conversion rate (412 patients) and the third laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a 1.3% conversion rate (161 patients). Data was collected prospectively using a continuous audit, and the complication rate compared on an intention to treat basis. In addition a panel of experienced surgeons was asked to score the complications depending on their severity and a composite complication score calculated. Comparison between the 3 groups was then undertaken. Results Open cholecystectomy produced a postoperative complication rate of 6%. Initially this appeared to fall to 3.1% with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but when the complications occurring in the converted patients were included (i.e., on an intention to treat basis) the rate increased to 5.6% in the first group of laparoscopically- treated patients and 3.1% in the second. These differences were not statistically significant. A similar pattern emerged when scoring the severity of the complications as judged by the expert panel. The inclusion of intra-operative complications appears to remove any small advantage for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The reduction in the conversion rate between the two laparoscopic groups from 5.8% to 1.2% was statistically significant. Conclusion When considered on an intention to treat basis laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers no advantage over open operation in terms of the frequency or severity of complications. Reducing the frequency of conversion from a laparoscopic to an open procedure also has no significant effect on the complications encountered. We conclude, therefore, that the complication rate is independent of the conversion rate and that the surgeon, when faced with difficulty at laparoscopic cholecystectomy, should not be deterred from converting to open operation for fear of the post-operative consequences.
format Text
id pubmed-2424007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24240072008-07-08 Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications Thompson, M. H. Benger, J. R. HPB Surg Research Article Background Faced with a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy the surgeon may feel that conversion to open operation would risk greater complications because of the laparotomy. Information on the effect of conversion is lacking. The purpose of this study is to measure the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and observe the effect of the conversion rate. Methods A total of 957 patients were studied. There were three consecutive series of patients; the first undergoing open cholecystectomy (384 patients), the second laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a 5.8% conversion rate (412 patients) and the third laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a 1.3% conversion rate (161 patients). Data was collected prospectively using a continuous audit, and the complication rate compared on an intention to treat basis. In addition a panel of experienced surgeons was asked to score the complications depending on their severity and a composite complication score calculated. Comparison between the 3 groups was then undertaken. Results Open cholecystectomy produced a postoperative complication rate of 6%. Initially this appeared to fall to 3.1% with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but when the complications occurring in the converted patients were included (i.e., on an intention to treat basis) the rate increased to 5.6% in the first group of laparoscopically- treated patients and 3.1% in the second. These differences were not statistically significant. A similar pattern emerged when scoring the severity of the complications as judged by the expert panel. The inclusion of intra-operative complications appears to remove any small advantage for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The reduction in the conversion rate between the two laparoscopic groups from 5.8% to 1.2% was statistically significant. Conclusion When considered on an intention to treat basis laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers no advantage over open operation in terms of the frequency or severity of complications. Reducing the frequency of conversion from a laparoscopic to an open procedure also has no significant effect on the complications encountered. We conclude, therefore, that the complication rate is independent of the conversion rate and that the surgeon, when faced with difficulty at laparoscopic cholecystectomy, should not be deterred from converting to open operation for fear of the post-operative consequences. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2000-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2424007/ /pubmed/10977115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/56760 Text en Copyright © 2000 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thompson, M. H.
Benger, J. R.
Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications
title Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications
title_full Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications
title_fullStr Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications
title_full_unstemmed Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications
title_short Cholecystectomy, Conversion and Complications
title_sort cholecystectomy, conversion and complications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2424007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10977115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2000/56760
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonmh cholecystectomyconversionandcomplications
AT bengerjr cholecystectomyconversionandcomplications