Cargando…

Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare DNA histograms obtained by standard flow cytometry (FC) and high fidelity image cytometry on sections (ICS) in normal gastrointestinal mucosa and Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAC). METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Qin, Yu, Chenggong, Zhang, Xiaoqi, Goyal, Raj K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2424056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-8-5
_version_ 1782156240704503808
author Huang, Qin
Yu, Chenggong
Zhang, Xiaoqi
Goyal, Raj K
author_facet Huang, Qin
Yu, Chenggong
Zhang, Xiaoqi
Goyal, Raj K
author_sort Huang, Qin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare DNA histograms obtained by standard flow cytometry (FC) and high fidelity image cytometry on sections (ICS) in normal gastrointestinal mucosa and Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAC). METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 10 normal controls from 10 subjects and 42 BAC tissues from 17 patients were examined. DNA FC was performed using standard techniques and ICS was carried out by Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS). DNA ploidy histograms were classified into diploid with peak DNA index (DI) at 0.9–1.1, and aneuploid with peak DI > 1.1. DI values of aneuploid peaks were determined. Additionally, for DNA ICS, heterogeneity index (HI) representing DNA content heterogeneity, and histograms containing cells with DI > G2 were also identified. RESULTS: All control samples were diploid by both FC and ICS analyses. In BAC, FC showed diploid peaks in 29%, diploid peaks with additional aneuploid or tetraploid peaks in 57%, and 14% of the samples, respectively. In contrast, ICS showed aneuploid peaks in all the cases with peak DI > 1.25; 37 cases had peak DI between 1.25 and 2.25; and 5 cases had peak DI > 2.25. HI values (mean ± SD) were 11.3 ± 1.1 in controls and 32.4 ± 8.5 in BAC (p < 0.05). Controls had no G2 exceeding cells. However, 19/37 (51%) of the cases with primary peak DI < 2.25 had cells exceeding 9N. CONCLUSION: ICS detects DNA aneuploidy in all BAC samples while FC missed the diagnosis of aneuploidy in 29%. In addition, ICS provides more information on HI and G2 exceeding rates.
format Text
id pubmed-2424056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24240562008-06-11 Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma Huang, Qin Yu, Chenggong Zhang, Xiaoqi Goyal, Raj K BMC Clin Pathol Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare DNA histograms obtained by standard flow cytometry (FC) and high fidelity image cytometry on sections (ICS) in normal gastrointestinal mucosa and Barrett's adenocarcinoma (BAC). METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 10 normal controls from 10 subjects and 42 BAC tissues from 17 patients were examined. DNA FC was performed using standard techniques and ICS was carried out by Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS). DNA ploidy histograms were classified into diploid with peak DNA index (DI) at 0.9–1.1, and aneuploid with peak DI > 1.1. DI values of aneuploid peaks were determined. Additionally, for DNA ICS, heterogeneity index (HI) representing DNA content heterogeneity, and histograms containing cells with DI > G2 were also identified. RESULTS: All control samples were diploid by both FC and ICS analyses. In BAC, FC showed diploid peaks in 29%, diploid peaks with additional aneuploid or tetraploid peaks in 57%, and 14% of the samples, respectively. In contrast, ICS showed aneuploid peaks in all the cases with peak DI > 1.25; 37 cases had peak DI between 1.25 and 2.25; and 5 cases had peak DI > 2.25. HI values (mean ± SD) were 11.3 ± 1.1 in controls and 32.4 ± 8.5 in BAC (p < 0.05). Controls had no G2 exceeding cells. However, 19/37 (51%) of the cases with primary peak DI < 2.25 had cells exceeding 9N. CONCLUSION: ICS detects DNA aneuploidy in all BAC samples while FC missed the diagnosis of aneuploidy in 29%. In addition, ICS provides more information on HI and G2 exceeding rates. BioMed Central 2008-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2424056/ /pubmed/18513411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-8-5 Text en Copyright © 2008 Huang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Qin
Yu, Chenggong
Zhang, Xiaoqi
Goyal, Raj K
Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma
title Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma
title_full Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma
title_short Comparison of DNA histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in Barrett's adenocarcinoma
title_sort comparison of dna histograms by standard flow cytometry and image cytometry on sections in barrett's adenocarcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2424056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-8-5
work_keys_str_mv AT huangqin comparisonofdnahistogramsbystandardflowcytometryandimagecytometryonsectionsinbarrettsadenocarcinoma
AT yuchenggong comparisonofdnahistogramsbystandardflowcytometryandimagecytometryonsectionsinbarrettsadenocarcinoma
AT zhangxiaoqi comparisonofdnahistogramsbystandardflowcytometryandimagecytometryonsectionsinbarrettsadenocarcinoma
AT goyalrajk comparisonofdnahistogramsbystandardflowcytometryandimagecytometryonsectionsinbarrettsadenocarcinoma