Cargando…

Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs can mitigate the health and economic burden of STIs. A tool to estimate the economic benefits of STI programs could prove useful to STI program personnel. METHODS: We developed formulas that can be applied to estimate the direct me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chesson, Harrell W, Collins, Dayne, Koski, Kathryn
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2426671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-6-10
_version_ 1782156273064607744
author Chesson, Harrell W
Collins, Dayne
Koski, Kathryn
author_facet Chesson, Harrell W
Collins, Dayne
Koski, Kathryn
author_sort Chesson, Harrell W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs can mitigate the health and economic burden of STIs. A tool to estimate the economic benefits of STI programs could prove useful to STI program personnel. METHODS: We developed formulas that can be applied to estimate the direct medical costs and indirect costs (lost productivity) averted by STI programs in the United States. Costs and probabilities for these formulas were based primarily on published studies. RESULTS: We present a series of formulas that can be used to estimate the economic benefits of STI prevention (in 2006 US dollars), using data routinely collected by STI programs. For example, the averted sequelae costs associated with treating women for chlamydia is given as (C(w))(0.16)(0.925)(0.70)($1,995), where C(w )is the number of infected women treated for chlamydia, 0.16 is the absolute reduction in the probability of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) as a result of treatment, 0.925 is an adjustment factor to prevent double-counting of PID averted in women with both chlamydia and gonorrhea, 0.70 is an adjustment factor to account for the possibility of re-infection, and $1,995 is the average cost per case of PID, based on published sources. CONCLUSION: The formulas developed in this study can be a useful tool for STI program personnel to generate evidence-based estimates of the economic impact of their program and can facilitate the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of their activities.
format Text
id pubmed-2426671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24266712008-06-12 Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States Chesson, Harrell W Collins, Dayne Koski, Kathryn Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs can mitigate the health and economic burden of STIs. A tool to estimate the economic benefits of STI programs could prove useful to STI program personnel. METHODS: We developed formulas that can be applied to estimate the direct medical costs and indirect costs (lost productivity) averted by STI programs in the United States. Costs and probabilities for these formulas were based primarily on published studies. RESULTS: We present a series of formulas that can be used to estimate the economic benefits of STI prevention (in 2006 US dollars), using data routinely collected by STI programs. For example, the averted sequelae costs associated with treating women for chlamydia is given as (C(w))(0.16)(0.925)(0.70)($1,995), where C(w )is the number of infected women treated for chlamydia, 0.16 is the absolute reduction in the probability of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) as a result of treatment, 0.925 is an adjustment factor to prevent double-counting of PID averted in women with both chlamydia and gonorrhea, 0.70 is an adjustment factor to account for the possibility of re-infection, and $1,995 is the average cost per case of PID, based on published sources. CONCLUSION: The formulas developed in this study can be a useful tool for STI program personnel to generate evidence-based estimates of the economic impact of their program and can facilitate the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of their activities. BioMed Central 2008-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2426671/ /pubmed/18500996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-6-10 Text en Copyright © 2008 Chesson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chesson, Harrell W
Collins, Dayne
Koski, Kathryn
Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States
title Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States
title_full Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States
title_fullStr Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States
title_short Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States
title_sort formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (sti) prevention programs in the united states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2426671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-6-10
work_keys_str_mv AT chessonharrellw formulasforestimatingthecostsavertedbysexuallytransmittedinfectionstipreventionprogramsintheunitedstates
AT collinsdayne formulasforestimatingthecostsavertedbysexuallytransmittedinfectionstipreventionprogramsintheunitedstates
AT koskikathryn formulasforestimatingthecostsavertedbysexuallytransmittedinfectionstipreventionprogramsintheunitedstates