Cargando…

Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method

BACKGROUND: In epidemiological research, physical activity is usually assessed by questionnaires. Questionnaires are suitable for large study populations since they are relatively inexpensive and not very time consuming. However, questionnaire information is by definition subjective and prone to rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertogh, Emmy M, Monninkhof, Evelyn M, Schouten, Evert G, Peeters, Petra HM, Schuit, Albertine J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2426713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18505554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-30
_version_ 1782156284618866688
author Hertogh, Emmy M
Monninkhof, Evelyn M
Schouten, Evert G
Peeters, Petra HM
Schuit, Albertine J
author_facet Hertogh, Emmy M
Monninkhof, Evelyn M
Schouten, Evert G
Peeters, Petra HM
Schuit, Albertine J
author_sort Hertogh, Emmy M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In epidemiological research, physical activity is usually assessed by questionnaires. Questionnaires are suitable for large study populations since they are relatively inexpensive and not very time consuming. However, questionnaire information is by definition subjective and prone to recall bias, especially among elderly subjects. The Modified Baecke Questionnaire, developed by Voorrips and coworkers, measures habitual physical activity in the elderly. The questionnaire includes questions on household activities, sports, and leisure time activities, over a time period of one year. The Modified Baecke Questionnaire results in a score to classify people as high, moderate, or low in daily physical activity, based on tertiles. METHODS: The validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire score was assessed among 21 elderly men and women using the doubly labeled water method as the reference criterion. This method is considered to be the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure in free-living individuals. Energy expenditure on physical activity is estimated by the ratio of total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method and resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry. This ratio is called the physical activity ratio. RESULTS: The Spearman correlation coefficient between the questionnaire score and the physical activity ratio (PAR) was 0.54 (95% CI 0.22–0.66). Correct classification by the questionnaire occurred in 71% of participants who were in the lowest tertile of PAR, in 14% of participants in the middle tertile, and in 43% of participants in the highest tertile. Subjects were not wrongly classified in an opposite tertile. CONCLUSION: The validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire is fair-to-moderate. This study shows that the questionnaire can correctly classify individuals as low or high active, but does a poor job for moderately active individuals.
format Text
id pubmed-2426713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24267132008-06-12 Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method Hertogh, Emmy M Monninkhof, Evelyn M Schouten, Evert G Peeters, Petra HM Schuit, Albertine J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: In epidemiological research, physical activity is usually assessed by questionnaires. Questionnaires are suitable for large study populations since they are relatively inexpensive and not very time consuming. However, questionnaire information is by definition subjective and prone to recall bias, especially among elderly subjects. The Modified Baecke Questionnaire, developed by Voorrips and coworkers, measures habitual physical activity in the elderly. The questionnaire includes questions on household activities, sports, and leisure time activities, over a time period of one year. The Modified Baecke Questionnaire results in a score to classify people as high, moderate, or low in daily physical activity, based on tertiles. METHODS: The validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire score was assessed among 21 elderly men and women using the doubly labeled water method as the reference criterion. This method is considered to be the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure in free-living individuals. Energy expenditure on physical activity is estimated by the ratio of total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method and resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry. This ratio is called the physical activity ratio. RESULTS: The Spearman correlation coefficient between the questionnaire score and the physical activity ratio (PAR) was 0.54 (95% CI 0.22–0.66). Correct classification by the questionnaire occurred in 71% of participants who were in the lowest tertile of PAR, in 14% of participants in the middle tertile, and in 43% of participants in the highest tertile. Subjects were not wrongly classified in an opposite tertile. CONCLUSION: The validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire is fair-to-moderate. This study shows that the questionnaire can correctly classify individuals as low or high active, but does a poor job for moderately active individuals. BioMed Central 2008-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2426713/ /pubmed/18505554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-30 Text en Copyright © 2008 Hertogh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hertogh, Emmy M
Monninkhof, Evelyn M
Schouten, Evert G
Peeters, Petra HM
Schuit, Albertine J
Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
title Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
title_full Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
title_fullStr Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
title_short Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
title_sort validity of the modified baecke questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2426713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18505554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-30
work_keys_str_mv AT hertoghemmym validityofthemodifiedbaeckequestionnairecomparisonwithenergyexpenditureaccordingtothedoublylabeledwatermethod
AT monninkhofevelynm validityofthemodifiedbaeckequestionnairecomparisonwithenergyexpenditureaccordingtothedoublylabeledwatermethod
AT schoutenevertg validityofthemodifiedbaeckequestionnairecomparisonwithenergyexpenditureaccordingtothedoublylabeledwatermethod
AT peeterspetrahm validityofthemodifiedbaeckequestionnairecomparisonwithenergyexpenditureaccordingtothedoublylabeledwatermethod
AT schuitalbertinej validityofthemodifiedbaeckequestionnairecomparisonwithenergyexpenditureaccordingtothedoublylabeledwatermethod