Cargando…

National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development

BACKGROUND: Governments are increasingly introducing performance management systems to improve the quality and outcomes of health care. Two types of approaches have been described: assurance systems that use summative information for external accountability and internally driven systems that use for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardner, Karen L, Sibthorpe, Beverly, Longstaff, Duncan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18510779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-5-8
_version_ 1782156321812905984
author Gardner, Karen L
Sibthorpe, Beverly
Longstaff, Duncan
author_facet Gardner, Karen L
Sibthorpe, Beverly
Longstaff, Duncan
author_sort Gardner, Karen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Governments are increasingly introducing performance management systems to improve the quality and outcomes of health care. Two types of approaches have been described: assurance systems that use summative information for external accountability and internally driven systems that use formative information for continuous quality improvement. Australia recently introduced a National Quality and Performance System (NQPS) for Divisions of General Practice that has the dual purposes of increasing accountability and improving performance. In this article, we ask whether the framework can deliver on its objectives for achieving accountability and fostering performance improvement. We examine the system in terms of four factors identified in a recent systematic review of indicator systems known to improve their use. These are: involving stakeholders in development; having clear objectives; approach to data collection and analysis including using 'soft data' to aid interpretation; and feeding back information. RESULTS: We found that early consultative processes influenced system development. The system promotes the collection of performance information against defined program objectives. Data includes a mix of qualitative and quantitative indicators that are fitted to a conceptual framework that facilitates an approach to performance assessment that could underpin continuous quality improvement at the Division level. Feedback of information to support the development of quality improvement activities has not been fully developed. CONCLUSION: The system currently has elements that, with further development, could support a more continuous quality improvement or assurance based approach. Careful consideration needs to be given to the development of methods for analysis and review of performance indicators, performance assessment and engagement with consumers. The partnership arrangement that supported early development could be expected to serve as an important vehicle for further development.
format Text
id pubmed-2427045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24270452008-06-13 National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development Gardner, Karen L Sibthorpe, Beverly Longstaff, Duncan Aust New Zealand Health Policy Research BACKGROUND: Governments are increasingly introducing performance management systems to improve the quality and outcomes of health care. Two types of approaches have been described: assurance systems that use summative information for external accountability and internally driven systems that use formative information for continuous quality improvement. Australia recently introduced a National Quality and Performance System (NQPS) for Divisions of General Practice that has the dual purposes of increasing accountability and improving performance. In this article, we ask whether the framework can deliver on its objectives for achieving accountability and fostering performance improvement. We examine the system in terms of four factors identified in a recent systematic review of indicator systems known to improve their use. These are: involving stakeholders in development; having clear objectives; approach to data collection and analysis including using 'soft data' to aid interpretation; and feeding back information. RESULTS: We found that early consultative processes influenced system development. The system promotes the collection of performance information against defined program objectives. Data includes a mix of qualitative and quantitative indicators that are fitted to a conceptual framework that facilitates an approach to performance assessment that could underpin continuous quality improvement at the Division level. Feedback of information to support the development of quality improvement activities has not been fully developed. CONCLUSION: The system currently has elements that, with further development, could support a more continuous quality improvement or assurance based approach. Careful consideration needs to be given to the development of methods for analysis and review of performance indicators, performance assessment and engagement with consumers. The partnership arrangement that supported early development could be expected to serve as an important vehicle for further development. BioMed Central 2008-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2427045/ /pubmed/18510779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-5-8 Text en Copyright © 2008 Gardner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gardner, Karen L
Sibthorpe, Beverly
Longstaff, Duncan
National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development
title National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development
title_full National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development
title_fullStr National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development
title_full_unstemmed National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development
title_short National quality and performance system for Divisions of General Practice: early reflections on a system under development
title_sort national quality and performance system for divisions of general practice: early reflections on a system under development
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18510779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-5-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gardnerkarenl nationalqualityandperformancesystemfordivisionsofgeneralpracticeearlyreflectionsonasystemunderdevelopment
AT sibthorpebeverly nationalqualityandperformancesystemfordivisionsofgeneralpracticeearlyreflectionsonasystemunderdevelopment
AT longstaffduncan nationalqualityandperformancesystemfordivisionsofgeneralpracticeearlyreflectionsonasystemunderdevelopment