Cargando…

The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Carmen L, Brenner, Alison T, Griffith, Jennifer M, Pignone, Michael P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-32
_version_ 1782156322833170432
author Lewis, Carmen L
Brenner, Alison T
Griffith, Jennifer M
Pignone, Michael P
author_facet Lewis, Carmen L
Brenner, Alison T
Griffith, Jennifer M
Pignone, Michael P
author_sort Lewis, Carmen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of promoting colon cancer screening in primary care practice. METHODS: We conducted a controlled trial comparing the proportion of intervention patients who received colon cancer screening with wait list controls at one practice site. The intervention was a mailed package that included a letter from their primary care physician, a colon cancer screening decision aid, and instructions for obtaining each screening test without an office visit so that patients could access screening tests directly. Major outcomes were screening test completion and cost per additional patient screened. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 15% (20/137) were screened versus 4% (4/100) in the control group (difference 11%; (95%; CI 3%;18% p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient screened was estimated to be $94. CONCLUSION: A multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing patients direct access to schedule screening tests, increased colon cancer screening test completion in a subset of patients within a single academic practice. Although the uptake of the decision aid was low, the cost was also modest, suggesting that this method could be a viable approach to colon cancer screening.
format Text
id pubmed-2427049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24270492008-06-13 The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial Lewis, Carmen L Brenner, Alison T Griffith, Jennifer M Pignone, Michael P Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of promoting colon cancer screening in primary care practice. METHODS: We conducted a controlled trial comparing the proportion of intervention patients who received colon cancer screening with wait list controls at one practice site. The intervention was a mailed package that included a letter from their primary care physician, a colon cancer screening decision aid, and instructions for obtaining each screening test without an office visit so that patients could access screening tests directly. Major outcomes were screening test completion and cost per additional patient screened. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 15% (20/137) were screened versus 4% (4/100) in the control group (difference 11%; (95%; CI 3%;18% p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient screened was estimated to be $94. CONCLUSION: A multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing patients direct access to schedule screening tests, increased colon cancer screening test completion in a subset of patients within a single academic practice. Although the uptake of the decision aid was low, the cost was also modest, suggesting that this method could be a viable approach to colon cancer screening. BioMed Central 2008-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2427049/ /pubmed/18518990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-32 Text en Copyright © 2008 Lewis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lewis, Carmen L
Brenner, Alison T
Griffith, Jennifer M
Pignone, Michael P
The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_full The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_fullStr The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_short The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
title_sort uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-32
work_keys_str_mv AT lewiscarmenl theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT brenneralisont theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT griffithjenniferm theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT pignonemichaelp theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT lewiscarmenl uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT brenneralisont uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT griffithjenniferm uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial
AT pignonemichaelp uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial