Cargando…
The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-32 |
_version_ | 1782156322833170432 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Carmen L Brenner, Alison T Griffith, Jennifer M Pignone, Michael P |
author_facet | Lewis, Carmen L Brenner, Alison T Griffith, Jennifer M Pignone, Michael P |
author_sort | Lewis, Carmen L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of promoting colon cancer screening in primary care practice. METHODS: We conducted a controlled trial comparing the proportion of intervention patients who received colon cancer screening with wait list controls at one practice site. The intervention was a mailed package that included a letter from their primary care physician, a colon cancer screening decision aid, and instructions for obtaining each screening test without an office visit so that patients could access screening tests directly. Major outcomes were screening test completion and cost per additional patient screened. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 15% (20/137) were screened versus 4% (4/100) in the control group (difference 11%; (95%; CI 3%;18% p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient screened was estimated to be $94. CONCLUSION: A multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing patients direct access to schedule screening tests, increased colon cancer screening test completion in a subset of patients within a single academic practice. Although the uptake of the decision aid was low, the cost was also modest, suggesting that this method could be a viable approach to colon cancer screening. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2427049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24270492008-06-13 The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial Lewis, Carmen L Brenner, Alison T Griffith, Jennifer M Pignone, Michael P Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing direct access to scheduling screening tests through standing orders, would be an effective and efficient means of promoting colon cancer screening in primary care practice. METHODS: We conducted a controlled trial comparing the proportion of intervention patients who received colon cancer screening with wait list controls at one practice site. The intervention was a mailed package that included a letter from their primary care physician, a colon cancer screening decision aid, and instructions for obtaining each screening test without an office visit so that patients could access screening tests directly. Major outcomes were screening test completion and cost per additional patient screened. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 15% (20/137) were screened versus 4% (4/100) in the control group (difference 11%; (95%; CI 3%;18% p = 0.01). The cost per additional patient screened was estimated to be $94. CONCLUSION: A multi-modal intervention, which included mailing a patient reminder with a colon cancer decision aid to patients and system changes allowing patients direct access to schedule screening tests, increased colon cancer screening test completion in a subset of patients within a single academic practice. Although the uptake of the decision aid was low, the cost was also modest, suggesting that this method could be a viable approach to colon cancer screening. BioMed Central 2008-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2427049/ /pubmed/18518990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-32 Text en Copyright © 2008 Lewis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lewis, Carmen L Brenner, Alison T Griffith, Jennifer M Pignone, Michael P The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial |
title | The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial |
title_full | The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial |
title_short | The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: A pilot controlled trial |
title_sort | uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewiscarmenl theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT brenneralisont theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT griffithjenniferm theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT pignonemichaelp theuptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT lewiscarmenl uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT brenneralisont uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT griffithjenniferm uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial AT pignonemichaelp uptakeandeffectofamailedmultimodalcoloncancerscreeninginterventionapilotcontrolledtrial |