Cargando…

Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population

BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic biomarkers are essential for assessing environmental exposure, and reflect adverse human health effects such as cellular damage. Arsenic is a potential clastogen and aneugen. In general, the majority of the studies on clastogenic effects of arsenic are based on frequency of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghosh, Pritha, Basu, Arindam, Singh, Keshav K, Giri, Ashok K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2430711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18505595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-7-45
_version_ 1782156423309819904
author Ghosh, Pritha
Basu, Arindam
Singh, Keshav K
Giri, Ashok K
author_facet Ghosh, Pritha
Basu, Arindam
Singh, Keshav K
Giri, Ashok K
author_sort Ghosh, Pritha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic biomarkers are essential for assessing environmental exposure, and reflect adverse human health effects such as cellular damage. Arsenic is a potential clastogen and aneugen. In general, the majority of the studies on clastogenic effects of arsenic are based on frequency of micronuclei (MN) study in peripheral lymphocytes, urothelial and oral epithelial cells. To find out the most suitable cell type, here, we compared cytogenetic damage through MN assay in (a) various populations exposed to arsenic through drinking water retrieved from literature review, as also (b) arsenic-induced Bowen's patients from our own survey. RESULTS: For literature review, we have searched the Pubmed database for English language journal articles using the following keywords: "arsenic", "micronuclei", "drinking water", and "human" in various combinations. We have selected 13 studies consistent with our inclusion criteria that measured micronuclei in either one or more of the above-mentioned three cell types, in human samples. Compared to urothelial and buccal mucosa cells, the median effect sizes measured by the difference between people with exposed and unexposed, lymphocyte based MN counts were found to be stronger. This general pattern pooled from 10 studies was consistent with our own set of three earlier studies. MN counts were also found to be stronger for lymphocytes even in arsenic-induced Bowen's patients (cases) compared to control individuals having arsenic-induced non-cancerous skin lesions. CONCLUSION: Overall, it can be concluded that MN in lymphocytes may be superior to other epithelial cells for studying arsenic-induced cytogenetic damage.
format Text
id pubmed-2430711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24307112008-06-19 Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population Ghosh, Pritha Basu, Arindam Singh, Keshav K Giri, Ashok K Mol Cancer Review BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic biomarkers are essential for assessing environmental exposure, and reflect adverse human health effects such as cellular damage. Arsenic is a potential clastogen and aneugen. In general, the majority of the studies on clastogenic effects of arsenic are based on frequency of micronuclei (MN) study in peripheral lymphocytes, urothelial and oral epithelial cells. To find out the most suitable cell type, here, we compared cytogenetic damage through MN assay in (a) various populations exposed to arsenic through drinking water retrieved from literature review, as also (b) arsenic-induced Bowen's patients from our own survey. RESULTS: For literature review, we have searched the Pubmed database for English language journal articles using the following keywords: "arsenic", "micronuclei", "drinking water", and "human" in various combinations. We have selected 13 studies consistent with our inclusion criteria that measured micronuclei in either one or more of the above-mentioned three cell types, in human samples. Compared to urothelial and buccal mucosa cells, the median effect sizes measured by the difference between people with exposed and unexposed, lymphocyte based MN counts were found to be stronger. This general pattern pooled from 10 studies was consistent with our own set of three earlier studies. MN counts were also found to be stronger for lymphocytes even in arsenic-induced Bowen's patients (cases) compared to control individuals having arsenic-induced non-cancerous skin lesions. CONCLUSION: Overall, it can be concluded that MN in lymphocytes may be superior to other epithelial cells for studying arsenic-induced cytogenetic damage. BioMed Central 2008-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2430711/ /pubmed/18505595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-7-45 Text en Copyright © 2008 Ghosh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ghosh, Pritha
Basu, Arindam
Singh, Keshav K
Giri, Ashok K
Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
title Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
title_full Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
title_fullStr Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
title_short Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
title_sort evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2430711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18505595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-7-45
work_keys_str_mv AT ghoshpritha evaluationofcelltypesforassessmentofcytogeneticdamageinarsenicexposedpopulation
AT basuarindam evaluationofcelltypesforassessmentofcytogeneticdamageinarsenicexposedpopulation
AT singhkeshavk evaluationofcelltypesforassessmentofcytogeneticdamageinarsenicexposedpopulation
AT giriashokk evaluationofcelltypesforassessmentofcytogeneticdamageinarsenicexposedpopulation