Cargando…

Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization

BACKGROUND: Routine cytogenetic investigations for ovarian cancers are limited by culture failure and poor growth of cancer cells compared to normal cells. Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) application or classical comparative genome hybridization techniques are also have their own limitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caserta, Donatella, Benkhalifa, Moncef, Baldi, Marina, Fiorentino, Francesco, Qumsiyeh, Mazin, Moscarini, Massimo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2435107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-1-10
_version_ 1782156466147295232
author Caserta, Donatella
Benkhalifa, Moncef
Baldi, Marina
Fiorentino, Francesco
Qumsiyeh, Mazin
Moscarini, Massimo
author_facet Caserta, Donatella
Benkhalifa, Moncef
Baldi, Marina
Fiorentino, Francesco
Qumsiyeh, Mazin
Moscarini, Massimo
author_sort Caserta, Donatella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine cytogenetic investigations for ovarian cancers are limited by culture failure and poor growth of cancer cells compared to normal cells. Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) application or classical comparative genome hybridization techniques are also have their own limitations in detecting genome imbalance especially for small changes that are not known ahead of time and for which FISH probes could not be thus designed. METHODS: We applied microarray comparative genomic hybridization (A-CGH) using one mega base BAC arrays to investigate chromosomal disorders in ovarian adenocarcinoma in patients with familial history. RESULTS: Our data on 10 cases of ovarian cancer revealed losses of 6q (4 cases mainly mosaic loss), 9p (4 cases), 10q (3 cases), 21q (3 cases), 22q (4 cases) with association to a monosomy X and gains of 8q and 9q (occurring together in 8 cases) and gain of 12p. There were other abnormalities such as loss of 17p that were noted in two profiles of the studied cases. Total or mosaic segmental gain of 2p, 3q, 4q, 7q and 13q were also observed. Seven of 10 patients were investigated by FISH to control array CGH results. The FISH data showed a concordance between the 2 methods. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that A-CGH detects unique and common abnormalities with certain exceptions such as tetraploidy and balanced translocation, which may lead to understanding progression of genetic changes as well as aid in early diagnosis and have an impact on therapy and prognosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2435107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24351072008-06-21 Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization Caserta, Donatella Benkhalifa, Moncef Baldi, Marina Fiorentino, Francesco Qumsiyeh, Mazin Moscarini, Massimo Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Routine cytogenetic investigations for ovarian cancers are limited by culture failure and poor growth of cancer cells compared to normal cells. Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) application or classical comparative genome hybridization techniques are also have their own limitations in detecting genome imbalance especially for small changes that are not known ahead of time and for which FISH probes could not be thus designed. METHODS: We applied microarray comparative genomic hybridization (A-CGH) using one mega base BAC arrays to investigate chromosomal disorders in ovarian adenocarcinoma in patients with familial history. RESULTS: Our data on 10 cases of ovarian cancer revealed losses of 6q (4 cases mainly mosaic loss), 9p (4 cases), 10q (3 cases), 21q (3 cases), 22q (4 cases) with association to a monosomy X and gains of 8q and 9q (occurring together in 8 cases) and gain of 12p. There were other abnormalities such as loss of 17p that were noted in two profiles of the studied cases. Total or mosaic segmental gain of 2p, 3q, 4q, 7q and 13q were also observed. Seven of 10 patients were investigated by FISH to control array CGH results. The FISH data showed a concordance between the 2 methods. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that A-CGH detects unique and common abnormalities with certain exceptions such as tetraploidy and balanced translocation, which may lead to understanding progression of genetic changes as well as aid in early diagnosis and have an impact on therapy and prognosis. BioMed Central 2008-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2435107/ /pubmed/18492273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-1-10 Text en Copyright © 2008 Caserta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Caserta, Donatella
Benkhalifa, Moncef
Baldi, Marina
Fiorentino, Francesco
Qumsiyeh, Mazin
Moscarini, Massimo
Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
title Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
title_full Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
title_fullStr Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
title_full_unstemmed Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
title_short Genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic BACs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
title_sort genome profiling of ovarian adenocarcinomas using pangenomic bacs microarray comparative genomic hybridization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2435107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-1-10
work_keys_str_mv AT casertadonatella genomeprofilingofovarianadenocarcinomasusingpangenomicbacsmicroarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT benkhalifamoncef genomeprofilingofovarianadenocarcinomasusingpangenomicbacsmicroarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT baldimarina genomeprofilingofovarianadenocarcinomasusingpangenomicbacsmicroarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT fiorentinofrancesco genomeprofilingofovarianadenocarcinomasusingpangenomicbacsmicroarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT qumsiyehmazin genomeprofilingofovarianadenocarcinomasusingpangenomicbacsmicroarraycomparativegenomichybridization
AT moscarinimassimo genomeprofilingofovarianadenocarcinomasusingpangenomicbacsmicroarraycomparativegenomichybridization