Cargando…

Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity

BACKGROUND: Clinicians and researchers often have to rely on information from caregivers to assess patients with advanced cancer. This study aims to assess the validity (using patients' assessment as the gold standard) of caregiver reports of patient concerns and the roles of caregiver burden a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higginson, Irene J, Gao, Wei
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2435233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-42
_version_ 1782156474607206400
author Higginson, Irene J
Gao, Wei
author_facet Higginson, Irene J
Gao, Wei
author_sort Higginson, Irene J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinicians and researchers often have to rely on information from caregivers to assess patients with advanced cancer. This study aims to assess the validity (using patients' assessment as the gold standard) of caregiver reports of patient concerns and the roles of caregiver burden and positivity. METHODS: A total of 64 advanced cancer patient and informal caregiver dyads were recruited from regional palliative care services and interviewed. Patients' outcomes were assessed with both the patient and the caregiver version of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS); caregiver burden and positivity were collected with the Zarit Burden interview (ZBI) and three questions on achievements and relationships. The agreement between patient- and caregiver-rated POS was measured with weighted kappa statistics. The roles of caregiver burden and positivity in POS agreement were studied with logistic regression controlling for potential confounders; adjusted odds ratios were estimated from the models. RESULTS: Agreement was substantial for pain, moderate for four items, fair for three items and slight for two items. Compared with patients self-ratings, caregivers described more problems with information given and sharing feelings and were less likely to assess the patient felt their life was worthwhile or felt good about themselves. Disagreement for three POS item ratings was significantly associated with higher caregiver burden: "feeling anxious"(OR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.3 to 15.6), "life worthwhile"(OR: 12.4; 95%CI: 2.9 to 54.3) and "felt good" (OR: 7.7; 95%CI: 2.0 to 29.6). Caregivers with higher positivity scores were more likely to agree patients' rating of "felt good"(OR: 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1–0.9) but at increased risk of disagreeing about patient's "practical problems"(OR: 4.2; 95%CI: 1.1 to 16.6). CONCLUSION: Caregiver burden and positivity affect their assessments, especially of psychological patient domains and whether patients assess their life as worthwhile. Awareness of this might help clinicians and researchers better interpret caregiver assessments.
format Text
id pubmed-2435233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24352332008-06-23 Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity Higginson, Irene J Gao, Wei Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Clinicians and researchers often have to rely on information from caregivers to assess patients with advanced cancer. This study aims to assess the validity (using patients' assessment as the gold standard) of caregiver reports of patient concerns and the roles of caregiver burden and positivity. METHODS: A total of 64 advanced cancer patient and informal caregiver dyads were recruited from regional palliative care services and interviewed. Patients' outcomes were assessed with both the patient and the caregiver version of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS); caregiver burden and positivity were collected with the Zarit Burden interview (ZBI) and three questions on achievements and relationships. The agreement between patient- and caregiver-rated POS was measured with weighted kappa statistics. The roles of caregiver burden and positivity in POS agreement were studied with logistic regression controlling for potential confounders; adjusted odds ratios were estimated from the models. RESULTS: Agreement was substantial for pain, moderate for four items, fair for three items and slight for two items. Compared with patients self-ratings, caregivers described more problems with information given and sharing feelings and were less likely to assess the patient felt their life was worthwhile or felt good about themselves. Disagreement for three POS item ratings was significantly associated with higher caregiver burden: "feeling anxious"(OR: 4.5; 95%CI: 1.3 to 15.6), "life worthwhile"(OR: 12.4; 95%CI: 2.9 to 54.3) and "felt good" (OR: 7.7; 95%CI: 2.0 to 29.6). Caregivers with higher positivity scores were more likely to agree patients' rating of "felt good"(OR: 0.3; 95%CI: 0.1–0.9) but at increased risk of disagreeing about patient's "practical problems"(OR: 4.2; 95%CI: 1.1 to 16.6). CONCLUSION: Caregiver burden and positivity affect their assessments, especially of psychological patient domains and whether patients assess their life as worthwhile. Awareness of this might help clinicians and researchers better interpret caregiver assessments. BioMed Central 2008-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2435233/ /pubmed/18518961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-42 Text en Copyright © 2008 Higginson and Gao; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Higginson, Irene J
Gao, Wei
Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
title Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
title_full Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
title_fullStr Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
title_full_unstemmed Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
title_short Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
title_sort caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2435233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-42
work_keys_str_mv AT higginsonirenej caregiverassessmentofpatientswithadvancedcancerconcordancewithpatientseffectofburdenandpositivity
AT gaowei caregiverassessmentofpatientswithadvancedcancerconcordancewithpatientseffectofburdenandpositivity