Cargando…

Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line

BACKGROUND: A broad spectrum of cytotoxicity assays is currently used in the fields of (eco)toxicology and pharmacology. To choose an appropriate assay, different parameters like test compounds, detection mechanism, specificity, and sensitivity have to be considered. Furthermore, tissue or cell line...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bopp, Stephanie K, Lettieri, Teresa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-8-8
_version_ 1782156513308049408
author Bopp, Stephanie K
Lettieri, Teresa
author_facet Bopp, Stephanie K
Lettieri, Teresa
author_sort Bopp, Stephanie K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A broad spectrum of cytotoxicity assays is currently used in the fields of (eco)toxicology and pharmacology. To choose an appropriate assay, different parameters like test compounds, detection mechanism, specificity, and sensitivity have to be considered. Furthermore, tissue or cell line can influence test performance. For zebrafish (Danio rerio), as emerging model organism, cell lines are now increasingly used, but few studies examined cytotoxicity in these cell systems. Therefore, we compared four cytotoxicity assays in the zebrafish liver cell line, ZFL, to test four differently acting model compounds. The tests comprised two colorimetric assays (MTT assay using 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, and the LDH assay detecting lactate dehydrogenase activity) and two fluorometric assays (alamarBlue(® )using resazurin, and CFDA-AM based on 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester). Model compounds were the pharmaceutical Tamoxifen, its metabolite 4-Hydroxy-Tamoxifen, the fungicide Flusilazole and the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon Benzo[a]pyrene. RESULTS: All four assays performed well in the ZFL cells and led to reproducible dose-response curves for all test compounds. Effective concentrations causing 10% or 50% loss of cell viability (EC(10 )and EC(50 )values) varied by a maximum factor of 7.0 for the EC(10 )values and a maximum factor of 1.8 for the EC(50 )values. The EC values were not statistically different between the four assays, which is due to the assessed unspecific effects of the compounds. However, most often, the MTT assay and LDH assay showed the highest and lowest EC values, respectively. Nevertheless, the LDH assay showed the highest intra- and inter-assay variabilities and the lowest signal-to-noise ratios. In contrast to MTT, the other three assays have the advantage of being non-destructive, easy to handle, and less time consuming. Furthermore, AB and CFDA-AM can be combined on the same set of cells without damaging the cells, allowing later on their use for the investigation of other endpoints. CONCLUSION: We recommend the alamarBlue and CFDA-AM assays for cytotoxicity assessment in ZFL cells, which can be applied either singly or combined.
format Text
id pubmed-2438350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24383502008-06-25 Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line Bopp, Stephanie K Lettieri, Teresa BMC Pharmacol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: A broad spectrum of cytotoxicity assays is currently used in the fields of (eco)toxicology and pharmacology. To choose an appropriate assay, different parameters like test compounds, detection mechanism, specificity, and sensitivity have to be considered. Furthermore, tissue or cell line can influence test performance. For zebrafish (Danio rerio), as emerging model organism, cell lines are now increasingly used, but few studies examined cytotoxicity in these cell systems. Therefore, we compared four cytotoxicity assays in the zebrafish liver cell line, ZFL, to test four differently acting model compounds. The tests comprised two colorimetric assays (MTT assay using 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, and the LDH assay detecting lactate dehydrogenase activity) and two fluorometric assays (alamarBlue(® )using resazurin, and CFDA-AM based on 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester). Model compounds were the pharmaceutical Tamoxifen, its metabolite 4-Hydroxy-Tamoxifen, the fungicide Flusilazole and the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon Benzo[a]pyrene. RESULTS: All four assays performed well in the ZFL cells and led to reproducible dose-response curves for all test compounds. Effective concentrations causing 10% or 50% loss of cell viability (EC(10 )and EC(50 )values) varied by a maximum factor of 7.0 for the EC(10 )values and a maximum factor of 1.8 for the EC(50 )values. The EC values were not statistically different between the four assays, which is due to the assessed unspecific effects of the compounds. However, most often, the MTT assay and LDH assay showed the highest and lowest EC values, respectively. Nevertheless, the LDH assay showed the highest intra- and inter-assay variabilities and the lowest signal-to-noise ratios. In contrast to MTT, the other three assays have the advantage of being non-destructive, easy to handle, and less time consuming. Furthermore, AB and CFDA-AM can be combined on the same set of cells without damaging the cells, allowing later on their use for the investigation of other endpoints. CONCLUSION: We recommend the alamarBlue and CFDA-AM assays for cytotoxicity assessment in ZFL cells, which can be applied either singly or combined. BioMed Central 2008-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2438350/ /pubmed/18513395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-8-8 Text en Copyright © 2008 Bopp and Lettieri; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Bopp, Stephanie K
Lettieri, Teresa
Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
title Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
title_full Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
title_fullStr Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
title_short Comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
title_sort comparison of four different colorimetric and fluorometric cytotoxicity assays in a zebrafish liver cell line
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18513395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-8-8
work_keys_str_mv AT boppstephaniek comparisonoffourdifferentcolorimetricandfluorometriccytotoxicityassaysinazebrafishlivercellline
AT lettieriteresa comparisonoffourdifferentcolorimetricandfluorometriccytotoxicityassaysinazebrafishlivercellline