Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model

BACKGROUND: The association of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and laminotomy has been clinically studied, but the corresponding in vitro biomechanical studies have not been reported. We investigated the hypothesis that the integrity of the posterior complex (spinous process-interspinou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tai, Ching-Lung, Hsieh, Pang-Hsing, Chen, Weng-Pin, Chen, Lih-Huei, Chen, Wen-Jer, Lai, Po-Liang
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-84
_version_ 1782156515467067392
author Tai, Ching-Lung
Hsieh, Pang-Hsing
Chen, Weng-Pin
Chen, Lih-Huei
Chen, Wen-Jer
Lai, Po-Liang
author_facet Tai, Ching-Lung
Hsieh, Pang-Hsing
Chen, Weng-Pin
Chen, Lih-Huei
Chen, Wen-Jer
Lai, Po-Liang
author_sort Tai, Ching-Lung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The association of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and laminotomy has been clinically studied, but the corresponding in vitro biomechanical studies have not been reported. We investigated the hypothesis that the integrity of the posterior complex (spinous process-interspinous ligament-spinous process) plays an important role on the postoperative spinal stability in decompressive surgery. METHODS: Eight porcine lumbar spine specimens were studied. Each specimen was tested intact and after two decompression procedures. All posterior components were preserved in Group A (Intact). In Group B (Bilateral laminotomy), the inferior margin of L4 lamina and superior margin of L5 lamina were removed, but the L4–L5 supraspinous ligament was preserved. Fenestrations were made on both sides. In Group C (Laminectomy) the lamina and spinous processes of lower L4 and upper L5 were removed. Ligamentum flavum and supraspinous ligament of L4–L5 were removed. A hydraulic testing machine was used to generate an increasing moment up to 8400 N-mm in flexion and extension. Intervertebral displacement at decompressive level L4–L5 was measured by extensometer RESULTS: The results indicated that, under extension motion, intervertebral displacement between the specimen in intact form and at two different decompression levels did not significantly differ (P > 0.05). However, under flexion motion, intervertebral displacement of the laminectomy specimens at decompression level L4–L5 was statistically greater than in intact or bilateral laminotomy specimens (P = 0.0000963 and P = 0.000418, respectively). No difference was found between intact and bilateral laminotomy groups. (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that a lumbar spine with posterior complex integrity is less likely to develop segment instability than a lumbar spine with a destroyed anchoring point for supraspinous ligament.
format Text
id pubmed-2438358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24383582008-06-25 Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model Tai, Ching-Lung Hsieh, Pang-Hsing Chen, Weng-Pin Chen, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Lai, Po-Liang BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The association of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and laminotomy has been clinically studied, but the corresponding in vitro biomechanical studies have not been reported. We investigated the hypothesis that the integrity of the posterior complex (spinous process-interspinous ligament-spinous process) plays an important role on the postoperative spinal stability in decompressive surgery. METHODS: Eight porcine lumbar spine specimens were studied. Each specimen was tested intact and after two decompression procedures. All posterior components were preserved in Group A (Intact). In Group B (Bilateral laminotomy), the inferior margin of L4 lamina and superior margin of L5 lamina were removed, but the L4–L5 supraspinous ligament was preserved. Fenestrations were made on both sides. In Group C (Laminectomy) the lamina and spinous processes of lower L4 and upper L5 were removed. Ligamentum flavum and supraspinous ligament of L4–L5 were removed. A hydraulic testing machine was used to generate an increasing moment up to 8400 N-mm in flexion and extension. Intervertebral displacement at decompressive level L4–L5 was measured by extensometer RESULTS: The results indicated that, under extension motion, intervertebral displacement between the specimen in intact form and at two different decompression levels did not significantly differ (P > 0.05). However, under flexion motion, intervertebral displacement of the laminectomy specimens at decompression level L4–L5 was statistically greater than in intact or bilateral laminotomy specimens (P = 0.0000963 and P = 0.000418, respectively). No difference was found between intact and bilateral laminotomy groups. (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that a lumbar spine with posterior complex integrity is less likely to develop segment instability than a lumbar spine with a destroyed anchoring point for supraspinous ligament. BioMed Central 2008-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2438358/ /pubmed/18547409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-84 Text en Copyright © 2008 Tai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tai, Ching-Lung
Hsieh, Pang-Hsing
Chen, Weng-Pin
Chen, Lih-Huei
Chen, Wen-Jer
Lai, Po-Liang
Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
title Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
title_full Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
title_short Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
title_sort biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome – an experimental study in porcine model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-84
work_keys_str_mv AT taichinglung biomechanicalcomparisonoflumbarspineinstabilitybetweenlaminectomyandbilaterallaminotomyforspinalstenosissyndromeanexperimentalstudyinporcinemodel
AT hsiehpanghsing biomechanicalcomparisonoflumbarspineinstabilitybetweenlaminectomyandbilaterallaminotomyforspinalstenosissyndromeanexperimentalstudyinporcinemodel
AT chenwengpin biomechanicalcomparisonoflumbarspineinstabilitybetweenlaminectomyandbilaterallaminotomyforspinalstenosissyndromeanexperimentalstudyinporcinemodel
AT chenlihhuei biomechanicalcomparisonoflumbarspineinstabilitybetweenlaminectomyandbilaterallaminotomyforspinalstenosissyndromeanexperimentalstudyinporcinemodel
AT chenwenjer biomechanicalcomparisonoflumbarspineinstabilitybetweenlaminectomyandbilaterallaminotomyforspinalstenosissyndromeanexperimentalstudyinporcinemodel
AT laipoliang biomechanicalcomparisonoflumbarspineinstabilitybetweenlaminectomyandbilaterallaminotomyforspinalstenosissyndromeanexperimentalstudyinporcinemodel