Cargando…

Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of maternal recall of children birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA), using the Danish Medical Birth Register (DBR) as reference and to examine the reliability of recalled BW and its potential correlates. DESIGN: Comparison of data from the DBR and the Europe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adegboye, ARA, Heitmann, BL
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18485168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01717.x
_version_ 1782156519858503680
author Adegboye, ARA
Heitmann, BL
author_facet Adegboye, ARA
Heitmann, BL
author_sort Adegboye, ARA
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of maternal recall of children birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA), using the Danish Medical Birth Register (DBR) as reference and to examine the reliability of recalled BW and its potential correlates. DESIGN: Comparison of data from the DBR and the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). SETTING: Schools in Odense, Denmark. POPULATION: A total of 1271 and 678 mothers of school children participated with information in the accuracy studies of BW and GA, respectively. The reliability sample of BW was composed of 359 women. METHOD: The agreement between the two sources was evaluated by mean differences (MD), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman's plots. The misclassification of the various BW and GA categories were also estimated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between recalled and registered BW and GA. RESULTS: There was high agreement between recalled and registered BW (MD =−0.2 g; ICC = 0.94) and GA (MD = 0.3 weeks; ICC = 0.76). Only 1.6% of BW would have been misclassified into low, normal or high BW and 16.5% of GA would have been misclassified into preterm, term or post-term based on maternal recall. The logistic regression revealed that the most important variables in the discordance between recalled and registered BW were ethnicity and parity. Maternal recall of BW was highly reliable (MD =−5.5 g; ICC = 0.93), and reliability remained high across subgroups. CONCLUSION: Maternal recall of BW and GA seems to be sufficiently accurate for clinical and epidemiological use. Please cite this paper as: Adegboye A, Heitmann B. Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age. BJOG 2008;115:886–893.
format Text
id pubmed-2438372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24383722008-06-26 Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age Adegboye, ARA Heitmann, BL BJOG Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of maternal recall of children birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA), using the Danish Medical Birth Register (DBR) as reference and to examine the reliability of recalled BW and its potential correlates. DESIGN: Comparison of data from the DBR and the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). SETTING: Schools in Odense, Denmark. POPULATION: A total of 1271 and 678 mothers of school children participated with information in the accuracy studies of BW and GA, respectively. The reliability sample of BW was composed of 359 women. METHOD: The agreement between the two sources was evaluated by mean differences (MD), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman's plots. The misclassification of the various BW and GA categories were also estimated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between recalled and registered BW and GA. RESULTS: There was high agreement between recalled and registered BW (MD =−0.2 g; ICC = 0.94) and GA (MD = 0.3 weeks; ICC = 0.76). Only 1.6% of BW would have been misclassified into low, normal or high BW and 16.5% of GA would have been misclassified into preterm, term or post-term based on maternal recall. The logistic regression revealed that the most important variables in the discordance between recalled and registered BW were ethnicity and parity. Maternal recall of BW was highly reliable (MD =−5.5 g; ICC = 0.93), and reliability remained high across subgroups. CONCLUSION: Maternal recall of BW and GA seems to be sufficiently accurate for clinical and epidemiological use. Please cite this paper as: Adegboye A, Heitmann B. Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age. BJOG 2008;115:886–893. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2438372/ /pubmed/18485168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01717.x Text en © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2008 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Adegboye, ARA
Heitmann, BL
Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
title Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
title_full Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
title_fullStr Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
title_short Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
title_sort accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18485168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01717.x
work_keys_str_mv AT adegboyeara accuracyandcorrelatesofmaternalrecallofbirthweightandgestationalage
AT heitmannbl accuracyandcorrelatesofmaternalrecallofbirthweightandgestationalage