Cargando…
A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554 |
_version_ | 1782156524192268288 |
---|---|
author | Stoel, Berend C. Borman, Terry M. |
author_facet | Stoel, Berend C. Borman, Terry M. |
author_sort | Stoel, Berend C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2438473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24384732008-07-02 A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins Stoel, Berend C. Borman, Terry M. PLoS One Research Article Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins. Public Library of Science 2008-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2438473/ /pubmed/18596937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554 Text en Stoel, Borman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stoel, Berend C. Borman, Terry M. A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins |
title | A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins |
title_full | A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins |
title_short | A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins |
title_sort | comparison of wood density between classical cremonese and modern violins |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoelberendc acomparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins AT bormanterrym acomparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins AT stoelberendc comparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins AT bormanterrym comparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins |