Cargando…

A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins

Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoel, Berend C., Borman, Terry M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554
_version_ 1782156524192268288
author Stoel, Berend C.
Borman, Terry M.
author_facet Stoel, Berend C.
Borman, Terry M.
author_sort Stoel, Berend C.
collection PubMed
description Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins.
format Text
id pubmed-2438473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24384732008-07-02 A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins Stoel, Berend C. Borman, Terry M. PLoS One Research Article Classical violins created by Cremonese masters, such as Antonio Stradivari and Giuseppe Guarneri Del Gesu, have become the benchmark to which the sound of all violins are compared in terms of their abilities of expressiveness and projection. By general consensus, no luthier since that time has been able to replicate the sound quality of these classical instruments. The vibration and sound radiation characteristics of a violin are determined by an instrument's geometry and the material properties of the wood. New test methods allow the non-destructive examination of one of the key material properties, the wood density, at the growth ring level of detail. The densities of five classical and eight modern violins were compared, using computed tomography and specially developed image-processing software. No significant differences were found between the median densities of the modern and the antique violins, however the density difference between wood grains of early and late growth was significantly smaller in the classical Cremonese violins compared with modern violins, in both the top (Spruce) and back (Maple) plates (p = 0.028 and 0.008, respectively). The mean density differential (SE) of the top plates of the modern and classical violins was 274 (26.6) and 183 (11.7) gram/liter. For the back plates, the values were 128 (2.6) and 115 (2.0) gram/liter. These differences in density differentials may reflect similar changes in stiffness distributions, which could directly impact vibrational efficacy or indirectly modify sound radiation via altered damping characteristics. Either of these mechanisms may help explain the acoustical differences between the classical and modern violins. Public Library of Science 2008-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2438473/ /pubmed/18596937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554 Text en Stoel, Borman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stoel, Berend C.
Borman, Terry M.
A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
title A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
title_full A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
title_fullStr A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
title_short A Comparison of Wood Density between Classical Cremonese and Modern Violins
title_sort comparison of wood density between classical cremonese and modern violins
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2438473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002554
work_keys_str_mv AT stoelberendc acomparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
AT bormanterrym acomparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
AT stoelberendc comparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins
AT bormanterrym comparisonofwooddensitybetweenclassicalcremoneseandmodernviolins