Cargando…

Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults

BACKGROUND: Activity monitors (AM) are small, electronic devices used to quantify the amount and intensity of physical activity (PA). Unfortunately, it has been demonstrated that data loss that occurs when AMs are not worn by subjects (removals during sleeping and waking hours) tend to result in bia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul, David R, Kramer, Matthew, Stote, Kim S, Spears, Karen E, Moshfegh, Alanna J, Baer, David J, Rumpler, William V
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18541038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-38
_version_ 1782156575348097024
author Paul, David R
Kramer, Matthew
Stote, Kim S
Spears, Karen E
Moshfegh, Alanna J
Baer, David J
Rumpler, William V
author_facet Paul, David R
Kramer, Matthew
Stote, Kim S
Spears, Karen E
Moshfegh, Alanna J
Baer, David J
Rumpler, William V
author_sort Paul, David R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Activity monitors (AM) are small, electronic devices used to quantify the amount and intensity of physical activity (PA). Unfortunately, it has been demonstrated that data loss that occurs when AMs are not worn by subjects (removals during sleeping and waking hours) tend to result in biased estimates of PA and total energy expenditure (TEE). No study has reported the degree of data loss in a large study of adults, and/or the degree to which the estimates of PA and TEE are affected. Also, no study in adults has proposed a methodology to minimize the effects of AM removals. METHODS: Adherence estimates were generated from a pool of 524 women and men that wore AMs for 13 – 15 consecutive days. To simulate the effect of data loss due to AM removal, a reference dataset was first compiled from a subset consisting of 35 highly adherent subjects (24 HR; minimum of 20 hrs/day for seven consecutive days). AM removals were then simulated during sleep and between one and ten waking hours using this 24 HR dataset. Differences in the mean values for PA and TEE between the 24 HR reference dataset and the different simulations were compared using paired t-tests and/or coefficients of variation. RESULTS: The estimated average adherence of the pool of 524 subjects was 15.8 ± 3.4 hrs/day for approximately 11.7 ± 2.0 days. Simulated data loss due to AM removals during sleeping hours in the 24 HR database (n = 35), resulted in biased estimates of PA (p < 0.05), but not TEE. Losing as little as one hour of data from the 24 HR dataset during waking hours results in significant biases (p < 0.0001) and variability (coefficients of variation between 7 and 21%) in the estimates of PA. Inserting a constant value for sleep and imputing estimates for missing data during waking hours significantly improved the estimates of PA. CONCLUSION: Although estimated adherence was good, measurements of PA can be improved by relatively simple imputation of missing AM data.
format Text
id pubmed-2440761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24407612008-06-27 Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults Paul, David R Kramer, Matthew Stote, Kim S Spears, Karen E Moshfegh, Alanna J Baer, David J Rumpler, William V BMC Med Res Methodol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Activity monitors (AM) are small, electronic devices used to quantify the amount and intensity of physical activity (PA). Unfortunately, it has been demonstrated that data loss that occurs when AMs are not worn by subjects (removals during sleeping and waking hours) tend to result in biased estimates of PA and total energy expenditure (TEE). No study has reported the degree of data loss in a large study of adults, and/or the degree to which the estimates of PA and TEE are affected. Also, no study in adults has proposed a methodology to minimize the effects of AM removals. METHODS: Adherence estimates were generated from a pool of 524 women and men that wore AMs for 13 – 15 consecutive days. To simulate the effect of data loss due to AM removal, a reference dataset was first compiled from a subset consisting of 35 highly adherent subjects (24 HR; minimum of 20 hrs/day for seven consecutive days). AM removals were then simulated during sleep and between one and ten waking hours using this 24 HR dataset. Differences in the mean values for PA and TEE between the 24 HR reference dataset and the different simulations were compared using paired t-tests and/or coefficients of variation. RESULTS: The estimated average adherence of the pool of 524 subjects was 15.8 ± 3.4 hrs/day for approximately 11.7 ± 2.0 days. Simulated data loss due to AM removals during sleeping hours in the 24 HR database (n = 35), resulted in biased estimates of PA (p < 0.05), but not TEE. Losing as little as one hour of data from the 24 HR dataset during waking hours results in significant biases (p < 0.0001) and variability (coefficients of variation between 7 and 21%) in the estimates of PA. Inserting a constant value for sleep and imputing estimates for missing data during waking hours significantly improved the estimates of PA. CONCLUSION: Although estimated adherence was good, measurements of PA can be improved by relatively simple imputation of missing AM data. BioMed Central 2008-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2440761/ /pubmed/18541038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-38 Text en Copyright © 2008 Paul et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Paul, David R
Kramer, Matthew
Stote, Kim S
Spears, Karen E
Moshfegh, Alanna J
Baer, David J
Rumpler, William V
Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
title Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
title_full Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
title_fullStr Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
title_short Estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
title_sort estimates of adherence and error analysis of physical activity data collected via accelerometry in a large study of free-living adults
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18541038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-38
work_keys_str_mv AT pauldavidr estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults
AT kramermatthew estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults
AT stotekims estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults
AT spearskarene estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults
AT moshfeghalannaj estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults
AT baerdavidj estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults
AT rumplerwilliamv estimatesofadherenceanderroranalysisofphysicalactivitydatacollectedviaaccelerometryinalargestudyoffreelivingadults