Cargando…

An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD

AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Wen-Miin, Chen, Jian-Jung, Chang, Chih-Hung, Chen, Hung-Wei, Chen, Shiah-Lian, Hang, Liang-Wen, Wang, Jung-Der
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5
_version_ 1782156592807936000
author Liang, Wen-Miin
Chen, Jian-Jung
Chang, Chih-Hung
Chen, Hung-Wei
Chen, Shiah-Lian
Hang, Liang-Wen
Wang, Jung-Der
author_facet Liang, Wen-Miin
Chen, Jian-Jung
Chang, Chih-Hung
Chen, Hung-Wei
Chen, Shiah-Lian
Hang, Liang-Wen
Wang, Jung-Der
author_sort Liang, Wen-Miin
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects’ lung functions. RESULTS: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). CONCLUSION: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment.
format Text
id pubmed-2440950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24409502008-06-27 An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD Liang, Wen-Miin Chen, Jian-Jung Chang, Chih-Hung Chen, Hung-Wei Chen, Shiah-Lian Hang, Liang-Wen Wang, Jung-Der Qual Life Res Article AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects’ lung functions. RESULTS: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). CONCLUSION: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment. Springer Netherlands 2008-05-24 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2440950/ /pubmed/18500580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Liang, Wen-Miin
Chen, Jian-Jung
Chang, Chih-Hung
Chen, Hung-Wei
Chen, Shiah-Lian
Hang, Liang-Wen
Wang, Jung-Der
An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
title An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
title_full An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
title_fullStr An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
title_full_unstemmed An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
title_short An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
title_sort empirical comparison of the whoqol-bref and the sgrq among patients with copd
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liangwenmiin anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT chenjianjung anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT changchihhung anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT chenhungwei anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT chenshiahlian anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT hangliangwen anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT wangjungder anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT liangwenmiin empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT chenjianjung empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT changchihhung empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT chenhungwei empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT chenshiahlian empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT hangliangwen empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd
AT wangjungder empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd