Cargando…
An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD
AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5 |
_version_ | 1782156592807936000 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Wen-Miin Chen, Jian-Jung Chang, Chih-Hung Chen, Hung-Wei Chen, Shiah-Lian Hang, Liang-Wen Wang, Jung-Der |
author_facet | Liang, Wen-Miin Chen, Jian-Jung Chang, Chih-Hung Chen, Hung-Wei Chen, Shiah-Lian Hang, Liang-Wen Wang, Jung-Der |
author_sort | Liang, Wen-Miin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects’ lung functions. RESULTS: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). CONCLUSION: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2440950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24409502008-06-27 An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD Liang, Wen-Miin Chen, Jian-Jung Chang, Chih-Hung Chen, Hung-Wei Chen, Shiah-Lian Hang, Liang-Wen Wang, Jung-Der Qual Life Res Article AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and to examine the association between pulmonary function and domains and items of these questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ were administered to 211 patients. The reliability and validity of, and correlations among, the domain scores were examined. Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify which items were independently associated with subjects’ lung functions. RESULTS: Both questionnaires showed good internal consistency (α > 0.8), except the SGRQ symptoms domain (α = 0.66), minimal ceiling and floor effects, and good item convergent and item discriminant validity. There were moderate correlations between physical domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and activity, impacts and total domains of the SGRQ, and between psychological domain of the WHOQOL-BREF and impacts and total domains of the SGRQ. Eighteen items were significantly associated with lung function, particularly those items relating to mobility/walking and activities of daily living (ADL). CONCLUSION: Both the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ showed comparable reliability and validity. Items related to mobility/walking and ADL may be useful in clinical screening for lung function impairment. Springer Netherlands 2008-05-24 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2440950/ /pubmed/18500580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Liang, Wen-Miin Chen, Jian-Jung Chang, Chih-Hung Chen, Hung-Wei Chen, Shiah-Lian Hang, Liang-Wen Wang, Jung-Der An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD |
title | An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD |
title_full | An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD |
title_fullStr | An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD |
title_short | An empirical comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SGRQ among patients with COPD |
title_sort | empirical comparison of the whoqol-bref and the sgrq among patients with copd |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9326-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangwenmiin anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT chenjianjung anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT changchihhung anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT chenhungwei anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT chenshiahlian anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT hangliangwen anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT wangjungder anempiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT liangwenmiin empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT chenjianjung empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT changchihhung empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT chenhungwei empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT chenshiahlian empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT hangliangwen empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd AT wangjungder empiricalcomparisonofthewhoqolbrefandthesgrqamongpatientswithcopd |