Cargando…
Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to ‘the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2441829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678 |
_version_ | 1782156643494002688 |
---|---|
author | Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. Wantia, Jan Isler, Karin |
author_facet | Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. Wantia, Jan Isler, Karin |
author_sort | Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, dominance hierarchies develop from pre-existing individual differences, such as in body mass. In the present paper, we investigate the relevance of each of these two theories for the degree of female dominance over males. We investigate this in a correlative study in which we compare female dominance between groups of 22 species throughout the primate order. In our study female dominance may range from 0 (no female dominance) to 1 (complete female dominance). As regards ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, we expected a negative correlation between female dominance over males and species-specific sexual dimorphism in body mass. However, to our surprise we found none (we use the method of independent contrasts). Instead, we confirm the self-organisation hypothesis: our model based on the winner-loser effect predicts that female dominance over males increases with the percentage of males in the group. We confirm this pattern at several levels in empirical data (among groups of a single species and between species of the same genus and of different ones). Since the winner-loser effect has been shown to work in many taxa including humans, these results may have broad implications. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2441829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24418292008-07-16 Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. Wantia, Jan Isler, Karin PLoS One Research Article The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, dominance hierarchies develop from pre-existing individual differences, such as in body mass. In the present paper, we investigate the relevance of each of these two theories for the degree of female dominance over males. We investigate this in a correlative study in which we compare female dominance between groups of 22 species throughout the primate order. In our study female dominance may range from 0 (no female dominance) to 1 (complete female dominance). As regards ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, we expected a negative correlation between female dominance over males and species-specific sexual dimorphism in body mass. However, to our surprise we found none (we use the method of independent contrasts). Instead, we confirm the self-organisation hypothesis: our model based on the winner-loser effect predicts that female dominance over males increases with the percentage of males in the group. We confirm this pattern at several levels in empirical data (among groups of a single species and between species of the same genus and of different ones). Since the winner-loser effect has been shown to work in many taxa including humans, these results may have broad implications. Public Library of Science 2008-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2441829/ /pubmed/18628830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678 Text en Hemelrijk et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. Wantia, Jan Isler, Karin Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism |
title | Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism |
title_full | Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism |
title_fullStr | Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism |
title_full_unstemmed | Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism |
title_short | Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism |
title_sort | female dominance over males in primates: self-organisation and sexual dimorphism |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2441829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hemelrijkcharlottek femaledominanceovermalesinprimatesselforganisationandsexualdimorphism AT wantiajan femaledominanceovermalesinprimatesselforganisationandsexualdimorphism AT islerkarin femaledominanceovermalesinprimatesselforganisationandsexualdimorphism |