Cargando…

Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism

The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to ‘the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemelrijk, Charlotte K., Wantia, Jan, Isler, Karin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2441829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678
_version_ 1782156643494002688
author Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
Wantia, Jan
Isler, Karin
author_facet Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
Wantia, Jan
Isler, Karin
author_sort Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
collection PubMed
description The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, dominance hierarchies develop from pre-existing individual differences, such as in body mass. In the present paper, we investigate the relevance of each of these two theories for the degree of female dominance over males. We investigate this in a correlative study in which we compare female dominance between groups of 22 species throughout the primate order. In our study female dominance may range from 0 (no female dominance) to 1 (complete female dominance). As regards ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, we expected a negative correlation between female dominance over males and species-specific sexual dimorphism in body mass. However, to our surprise we found none (we use the method of independent contrasts). Instead, we confirm the self-organisation hypothesis: our model based on the winner-loser effect predicts that female dominance over males increases with the percentage of males in the group. We confirm this pattern at several levels in empirical data (among groups of a single species and between species of the same genus and of different ones). Since the winner-loser effect has been shown to work in many taxa including humans, these results may have broad implications.
format Text
id pubmed-2441829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24418292008-07-16 Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. Wantia, Jan Isler, Karin PLoS One Research Article The processes that underlie the formation of the dominance hierarchy in a group are since long under debate. Models of self-organisation suggest that dominance hierarchies develop by the self-reinforcing effects of winning and losing fights (the so-called winner-loser effect), but according to ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, dominance hierarchies develop from pre-existing individual differences, such as in body mass. In the present paper, we investigate the relevance of each of these two theories for the degree of female dominance over males. We investigate this in a correlative study in which we compare female dominance between groups of 22 species throughout the primate order. In our study female dominance may range from 0 (no female dominance) to 1 (complete female dominance). As regards ‘the prior attribute hypothesis’, we expected a negative correlation between female dominance over males and species-specific sexual dimorphism in body mass. However, to our surprise we found none (we use the method of independent contrasts). Instead, we confirm the self-organisation hypothesis: our model based on the winner-loser effect predicts that female dominance over males increases with the percentage of males in the group. We confirm this pattern at several levels in empirical data (among groups of a single species and between species of the same genus and of different ones). Since the winner-loser effect has been shown to work in many taxa including humans, these results may have broad implications. Public Library of Science 2008-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2441829/ /pubmed/18628830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678 Text en Hemelrijk et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
Wantia, Jan
Isler, Karin
Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
title Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
title_full Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
title_fullStr Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
title_full_unstemmed Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
title_short Female Dominance over Males in Primates: Self-Organisation and Sexual Dimorphism
title_sort female dominance over males in primates: self-organisation and sexual dimorphism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2441829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002678
work_keys_str_mv AT hemelrijkcharlottek femaledominanceovermalesinprimatesselforganisationandsexualdimorphism
AT wantiajan femaledominanceovermalesinprimatesselforganisationandsexualdimorphism
AT islerkarin femaledominanceovermalesinprimatesselforganisationandsexualdimorphism