Cargando…
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study
This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2441953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604409 |
_version_ | 1782156650258366464 |
---|---|
author | Adamo, V Lorusso, V Rossello, R Adamo, B Ferraro, G Lorusso, D Condemi, G Priolo, D Di Lullo, L Paglia, A Pisconti, S Scambia, G Ferrandina, G |
author_facet | Adamo, V Lorusso, V Rossello, R Adamo, B Ferraro, G Lorusso, D Condemi, G Priolo, D Di Lullo, L Paglia, A Pisconti, S Scambia, G Ferrandina, G |
author_sort | Adamo, V |
collection | PubMed |
description | This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71 recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range=37–79), and 31 patients (43.7%) were ⩾65 years old. Patients received PLD, 25 mg m(−2), day 1, followed by GEM, 800 mg m(−2), days 1 and 8, q21. Response was evaluable in 64 cases. Eight complete (12.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.6%) were registered, with an overall response rate of 39.1%. Thirty patients (46.9%) experienced stable disease, with an overall clinical benefit of 85.9%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The rate of 1- and 2-year OS was 79 and 61%, respectively. A total of 443 courses were evaluable for toxicity: grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia affected 14 patients (20.3%) and 3 patients (4.3%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was documented in five cases (7.2%) and one case (1.4%), whereas grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred in six cases (8.7%) and two cases (2.9%), respectively. Grade 2 cardiac toxicity was observed in only one case. Interestingly enough, there was no difference in the percentage and severity of either haematological or non-haematological toxicity according to the age of the patients (<65 vs ⩾65 years). We confirmed in a large, very homogenous study sample of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients the efficacy and safety of PLD/GEM combination, providing response rates, median TTP and OS values comparable with those achieved with more toxic combinations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2441953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24419532009-09-10 Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study Adamo, V Lorusso, V Rossello, R Adamo, B Ferraro, G Lorusso, D Condemi, G Priolo, D Di Lullo, L Paglia, A Pisconti, S Scambia, G Ferrandina, G Br J Cancer Clinical Study This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71 recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range=37–79), and 31 patients (43.7%) were ⩾65 years old. Patients received PLD, 25 mg m(−2), day 1, followed by GEM, 800 mg m(−2), days 1 and 8, q21. Response was evaluable in 64 cases. Eight complete (12.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.6%) were registered, with an overall response rate of 39.1%. Thirty patients (46.9%) experienced stable disease, with an overall clinical benefit of 85.9%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The rate of 1- and 2-year OS was 79 and 61%, respectively. A total of 443 courses were evaluable for toxicity: grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia affected 14 patients (20.3%) and 3 patients (4.3%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was documented in five cases (7.2%) and one case (1.4%), whereas grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred in six cases (8.7%) and two cases (2.9%), respectively. Grade 2 cardiac toxicity was observed in only one case. Interestingly enough, there was no difference in the percentage and severity of either haematological or non-haematological toxicity according to the age of the patients (<65 vs ⩾65 years). We confirmed in a large, very homogenous study sample of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients the efficacy and safety of PLD/GEM combination, providing response rates, median TTP and OS values comparable with those achieved with more toxic combinations. Nature Publishing Group 2008-06-17 2008-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2441953/ /pubmed/18493232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604409 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Adamo, V Lorusso, V Rossello, R Adamo, B Ferraro, G Lorusso, D Condemi, G Priolo, D Di Lullo, L Paglia, A Pisconti, S Scambia, G Ferrandina, G Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study |
title | Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study |
title_full | Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study |
title_fullStr | Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study |
title_short | Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study |
title_sort | pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase ii study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2441953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamov pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT lorussov pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT rossellor pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT adamob pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT ferrarog pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT lorussod pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT condemig pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT priolod pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT dilullol pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT pagliaa pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT piscontis pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT scambiag pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy AT ferrandinag pegylatedliposomaldoxorubicinandgemcitabineinthefrontlinetreatmentofrecurrentmetastaticbreastcanceramulticentrephaseiistudy |