Cargando…

Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study

BACKGROUND: The stability of ophthalmic preparations in multidose containers is influenced by the preservative as well as the stability of the active ingredient. Unstable drugs may require refrigeration to preserve their active ingredient level and they are more likely to degrade over time, therefor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paolera, Mauricio D, Kasahara, Niro, Umbelino, Cristiano C, Walt, John G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-11
_version_ 1782156658639634432
author Paolera, Mauricio D
Kasahara, Niro
Umbelino, Cristiano C
Walt, John G
author_facet Paolera, Mauricio D
Kasahara, Niro
Umbelino, Cristiano C
Walt, John G
author_sort Paolera, Mauricio D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The stability of ophthalmic preparations in multidose containers is influenced by the preservative as well as the stability of the active ingredient. Unstable drugs may require refrigeration to preserve their active ingredient level and they are more likely to degrade over time, therefore becoming more susceptible to degradation based on patient mishandling. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of molecular degradation that occurs in bimatoprost and latanoprost in a patient-use setting. METHODS: This was an open-label, laboratory evaluation of the relative stability of bimatoprost and latanoprost. Patients presently using bimatoprost (n = 31) or latanoprost (n = 34) were identified at 2 clinical sites in Brazil. Patients were instructed to use and store their drops as usual and return all used medication bottles between day 28 and day 34 after opening. RESULTS: Bimatoprost demonstrated no degradation, but latanoprost degraded at various levels. The mean age of bimatoprost was 43.0 ± 3.4 days and the mean age of latanoprost was 43.9 ± 2.8 days (P = .072). The mean percentage of labeled concentration was 103.7% in the bimatoprost bottles and 88.1% in the latanoprost bottles (P < 001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that bimatoprost maintained ≥100% concentration throughout the study period while latanoprost did not.
format Text
id pubmed-2442051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24420512008-07-01 Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study Paolera, Mauricio D Kasahara, Niro Umbelino, Cristiano C Walt, John G BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: The stability of ophthalmic preparations in multidose containers is influenced by the preservative as well as the stability of the active ingredient. Unstable drugs may require refrigeration to preserve their active ingredient level and they are more likely to degrade over time, therefore becoming more susceptible to degradation based on patient mishandling. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of molecular degradation that occurs in bimatoprost and latanoprost in a patient-use setting. METHODS: This was an open-label, laboratory evaluation of the relative stability of bimatoprost and latanoprost. Patients presently using bimatoprost (n = 31) or latanoprost (n = 34) were identified at 2 clinical sites in Brazil. Patients were instructed to use and store their drops as usual and return all used medication bottles between day 28 and day 34 after opening. RESULTS: Bimatoprost demonstrated no degradation, but latanoprost degraded at various levels. The mean age of bimatoprost was 43.0 ± 3.4 days and the mean age of latanoprost was 43.9 ± 2.8 days (P = .072). The mean percentage of labeled concentration was 103.7% in the bimatoprost bottles and 88.1% in the latanoprost bottles (P < 001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that bimatoprost maintained ≥100% concentration throughout the study period while latanoprost did not. BioMed Central 2008-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2442051/ /pubmed/18547433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-11 Text en Copyright © 2008 Paolera et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paolera, Mauricio D
Kasahara, Niro
Umbelino, Cristiano C
Walt, John G
Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
title Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
title_full Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
title_fullStr Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
title_short Comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: A patient-use study
title_sort comparative study of the stability of bimatoprost 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%: a patient-use study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18547433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-11
work_keys_str_mv AT paoleramauriciod comparativestudyofthestabilityofbimatoprost003andlatanoprost0005apatientusestudy
AT kasaharaniro comparativestudyofthestabilityofbimatoprost003andlatanoprost0005apatientusestudy
AT umbelinocristianoc comparativestudyofthestabilityofbimatoprost003andlatanoprost0005apatientusestudy
AT waltjohng comparativestudyofthestabilityofbimatoprost003andlatanoprost0005apatientusestudy