Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are tumour associated antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies which have been raised against adenocarcinoma cell lines. The aim of this study was to determine whether their combined use could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. An...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
1991
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1777407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/23874 |
_version_ | 1782156745840263168 |
---|---|
author | Lucarotti, M. E. Rothnie, N. D. Kelly, S. B. Hershman, M. J. Johanssen, C. Nilsson, O. Lindholm, L. Wood, C. B. Williamson, R. C. N. Habib, N. A. |
author_facet | Lucarotti, M. E. Rothnie, N. D. Kelly, S. B. Hershman, M. J. Johanssen, C. Nilsson, O. Lindholm, L. Wood, C. B. Williamson, R. C. N. Habib, N. A. |
author_sort | Lucarotti, M. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are tumour associated antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies which have been raised against adenocarcinoma cell lines. The aim of this study was to determine whether their combined use could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. An immunoradiometric assay was used for the detection of CEA and CA19-9 and the Delfia system for CA50. Serum was collected from 65 normal subjects, 40 with hepatobiliary carcinoma (26 primary, 14 secondary) and 17 with benign hepatobiliary disease. The cut-off levels were calculated as the mean of the control group plus 2 standard deviations. All three antibodies contributed to improving the correct classification of secondary liver tumours (multivariant discriminant analysis p<0.05), but only CA19-9 and CA50 contributed to the diagnosis of primary liver tumours (multivariant analysis p<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy versus benign disease was 81% for primary carcinoma and 91% for secondary carcinoma. Combined use of CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 helps to differentiate benign from malignant hepatobiliary disease. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2442938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1991 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24429382008-07-08 Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease Lucarotti, M. E. Rothnie, N. D. Kelly, S. B. Hershman, M. J. Johanssen, C. Nilsson, O. Lindholm, L. Wood, C. B. Williamson, R. C. N. Habib, N. A. HPB Surg Research Article CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are tumour associated antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies which have been raised against adenocarcinoma cell lines. The aim of this study was to determine whether their combined use could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. An immunoradiometric assay was used for the detection of CEA and CA19-9 and the Delfia system for CA50. Serum was collected from 65 normal subjects, 40 with hepatobiliary carcinoma (26 primary, 14 secondary) and 17 with benign hepatobiliary disease. The cut-off levels were calculated as the mean of the control group plus 2 standard deviations. All three antibodies contributed to improving the correct classification of secondary liver tumours (multivariant discriminant analysis p<0.05), but only CA19-9 and CA50 contributed to the diagnosis of primary liver tumours (multivariant analysis p<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy versus benign disease was 81% for primary carcinoma and 91% for secondary carcinoma. Combined use of CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 helps to differentiate benign from malignant hepatobiliary disease. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1991 /pmc/articles/PMC2442938/ /pubmed/1777407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/23874 Text en Copyright © 1991 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lucarotti, M. E. Rothnie, N. D. Kelly, S. B. Hershman, M. J. Johanssen, C. Nilsson, O. Lindholm, L. Wood, C. B. Williamson, R. C. N. Habib, N. A. Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease |
title | Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of tumour marker combinations in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1777407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/23874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucarottime clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT rothniend clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT kellysb clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT hershmanmj clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT johanssenc clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT nilssono clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT lindholml clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT woodcb clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT williamsonrcn clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease AT habibna clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease |