Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease

CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are tumour associated antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies which have been raised against adenocarcinoma cell lines. The aim of this study was to determine whether their combined use could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. An...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucarotti, M. E., Rothnie, N. D., Kelly, S. B., Hershman, M. J., Johanssen, C., Nilsson, O., Lindholm, L., Wood, C. B., Williamson, R. C. N., Habib, N. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1991
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1777407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/23874
_version_ 1782156745840263168
author Lucarotti, M. E.
Rothnie, N. D.
Kelly, S. B.
Hershman, M. J.
Johanssen, C.
Nilsson, O.
Lindholm, L.
Wood, C. B.
Williamson, R. C. N.
Habib, N. A.
author_facet Lucarotti, M. E.
Rothnie, N. D.
Kelly, S. B.
Hershman, M. J.
Johanssen, C.
Nilsson, O.
Lindholm, L.
Wood, C. B.
Williamson, R. C. N.
Habib, N. A.
author_sort Lucarotti, M. E.
collection PubMed
description CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are tumour associated antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies which have been raised against adenocarcinoma cell lines. The aim of this study was to determine whether their combined use could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. An immunoradiometric assay was used for the detection of CEA and CA19-9 and the Delfia system for CA50. Serum was collected from 65 normal subjects, 40 with hepatobiliary carcinoma (26 primary, 14 secondary) and 17 with benign hepatobiliary disease. The cut-off levels were calculated as the mean of the control group plus 2 standard deviations. All three antibodies contributed to improving the correct classification of secondary liver tumours (multivariant discriminant analysis p<0.05), but only CA19-9 and CA50 contributed to the diagnosis of primary liver tumours (multivariant analysis p<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy versus benign disease was 81% for primary carcinoma and 91% for secondary carcinoma. Combined use of CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 helps to differentiate benign from malignant hepatobiliary disease.
format Text
id pubmed-2442938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1991
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24429382008-07-08 Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease Lucarotti, M. E. Rothnie, N. D. Kelly, S. B. Hershman, M. J. Johanssen, C. Nilsson, O. Lindholm, L. Wood, C. B. Williamson, R. C. N. Habib, N. A. HPB Surg Research Article CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 are tumour associated antigens defined by monoclonal antibodies which have been raised against adenocarcinoma cell lines. The aim of this study was to determine whether their combined use could improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. An immunoradiometric assay was used for the detection of CEA and CA19-9 and the Delfia system for CA50. Serum was collected from 65 normal subjects, 40 with hepatobiliary carcinoma (26 primary, 14 secondary) and 17 with benign hepatobiliary disease. The cut-off levels were calculated as the mean of the control group plus 2 standard deviations. All three antibodies contributed to improving the correct classification of secondary liver tumours (multivariant discriminant analysis p<0.05), but only CA19-9 and CA50 contributed to the diagnosis of primary liver tumours (multivariant analysis p<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy versus benign disease was 81% for primary carcinoma and 91% for secondary carcinoma. Combined use of CEA, CA19-9 and CA50 helps to differentiate benign from malignant hepatobiliary disease. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1991 /pmc/articles/PMC2442938/ /pubmed/1777407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/23874 Text en Copyright © 1991 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lucarotti, M. E.
Rothnie, N. D.
Kelly, S. B.
Hershman, M. J.
Johanssen, C.
Nilsson, O.
Lindholm, L.
Wood, C. B.
Williamson, R. C. N.
Habib, N. A.
Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
title Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Tumour Marker Combinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Liver Disease
title_sort clinical evaluation of tumour marker combinations in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1777407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1991/23874
work_keys_str_mv AT lucarottime clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT rothniend clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT kellysb clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT hershmanmj clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT johanssenc clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT nilssono clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT lindholml clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT woodcb clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT williamsonrcn clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease
AT habibna clinicalevaluationoftumourmarkercombinationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofbenignandmalignantliverdisease