Cargando…

Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study

Blood loss is the major cause of postoperative mortality and morbidity associated with hepatic resection. A prospective multicenter study was conducted to determine if ultrasonic dissectors (USD) were useful in hepatic resection and could reduce this hemorrhagic risk. Forty-seven hepatic resections...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millat, Bertrand, Hay, Jean-Marie, Descottes, Bernard, Fingerhut, Abe, Fagniez, Pierre-Louis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1992
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1610725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/59508
_version_ 1782156747072339968
author Millat, Bertrand
Hay, Jean-Marie
Descottes, Bernard
Fingerhut, Abe
Fagniez, Pierre-Louis
author_facet Millat, Bertrand
Hay, Jean-Marie
Descottes, Bernard
Fingerhut, Abe
Fagniez, Pierre-Louis
author_sort Millat, Bertrand
collection PubMed
description Blood loss is the major cause of postoperative mortality and morbidity associated with hepatic resection. A prospective multicenter study was conducted to determine if ultrasonic dissectors (USD) were useful in hepatic resection and could reduce this hemorrhagic risk. Forty-seven hepatic resections were performed in 42 consecutive patients during a two month period in 11 public, surgical centers. Twenty-one patients had primary or secondary malignancies, six had benign tumors, two had biliary cysts, one had cholangiocarcinoma, one had Caroli’s disease, and 11 had hydatid cysts of the liver. Two different USD devices were evaluated (CUSA System-Lasersonics and NIIC-DX 101 T). The hepatic resections tested included a wide range of procedures. Each surgeon had the possibility of choosing between the USD and his own usual technique for each operative step and according to local conditions. The average volume of blood infused, irrespective of the underlying pathology or the procedure performed, was 1.0 L (range 0-4.8 L). Fourteen patients required no transfusions. No operative or immediate postoperative deaths were recorded. Five major complications, all unrelated to the use of the USD, developed in three patients. Access to intra and extraparenchymal arterial and venous tributaries and particularly the control of the hepatic veins were facilitated by USD. While transection of hepatic parenchyma was neither easier nor faster than with conventional techniques, it was found to be less hemorrhagic. Overall appraisal was expressed on an analog scale; the USD was found to be helpful or very helpful in 75 percent of all resections. With regard to the pathology being treated, total or partial excision of hydatid cysts was greatly enhanced by the use of the USD while this benefit was not found for wedge resections of other hepatic lesions. With regard to user friendliness and maintenance, the NIIC-DX 101 T device was preferred. We conclude that the USD facilitates formal hepatic resections. Converging opinions emerging from various surgical centers reinforce this conclusion.
format Text
id pubmed-2442942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1992
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24429422008-07-08 Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study Millat, Bertrand Hay, Jean-Marie Descottes, Bernard Fingerhut, Abe Fagniez, Pierre-Louis HPB Surg Research Article Blood loss is the major cause of postoperative mortality and morbidity associated with hepatic resection. A prospective multicenter study was conducted to determine if ultrasonic dissectors (USD) were useful in hepatic resection and could reduce this hemorrhagic risk. Forty-seven hepatic resections were performed in 42 consecutive patients during a two month period in 11 public, surgical centers. Twenty-one patients had primary or secondary malignancies, six had benign tumors, two had biliary cysts, one had cholangiocarcinoma, one had Caroli’s disease, and 11 had hydatid cysts of the liver. Two different USD devices were evaluated (CUSA System-Lasersonics and NIIC-DX 101 T). The hepatic resections tested included a wide range of procedures. Each surgeon had the possibility of choosing between the USD and his own usual technique for each operative step and according to local conditions. The average volume of blood infused, irrespective of the underlying pathology or the procedure performed, was 1.0 L (range 0-4.8 L). Fourteen patients required no transfusions. No operative or immediate postoperative deaths were recorded. Five major complications, all unrelated to the use of the USD, developed in three patients. Access to intra and extraparenchymal arterial and venous tributaries and particularly the control of the hepatic veins were facilitated by USD. While transection of hepatic parenchyma was neither easier nor faster than with conventional techniques, it was found to be less hemorrhagic. Overall appraisal was expressed on an analog scale; the USD was found to be helpful or very helpful in 75 percent of all resections. With regard to the pathology being treated, total or partial excision of hydatid cysts was greatly enhanced by the use of the USD while this benefit was not found for wedge resections of other hepatic lesions. With regard to user friendliness and maintenance, the NIIC-DX 101 T device was preferred. We conclude that the USD facilitates formal hepatic resections. Converging opinions emerging from various surgical centers reinforce this conclusion. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1992 /pmc/articles/PMC2442942/ /pubmed/1610725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/59508 Text en Copyright © 1992 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Millat, Bertrand
Hay, Jean-Marie
Descottes, Bernard
Fingerhut, Abe
Fagniez, Pierre-Louis
Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study
title Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study
title_full Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study
title_short Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasonic Surgical Dissectors in Hepatic Resection: A Cooperative Multicenter Study
title_sort prospective evaluation of ultrasonic surgical dissectors in hepatic resection: a cooperative multicenter study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2442942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1610725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1992/59508
work_keys_str_mv AT millatbertrand prospectiveevaluationofultrasonicsurgicaldissectorsinhepaticresectionacooperativemulticenterstudy
AT hayjeanmarie prospectiveevaluationofultrasonicsurgicaldissectorsinhepaticresectionacooperativemulticenterstudy
AT descottesbernard prospectiveevaluationofultrasonicsurgicaldissectorsinhepaticresectionacooperativemulticenterstudy
AT fingerhutabe prospectiveevaluationofultrasonicsurgicaldissectorsinhepaticresectionacooperativemulticenterstudy
AT fagniezpierrelouis prospectiveevaluationofultrasonicsurgicaldissectorsinhepaticresectionacooperativemulticenterstudy