Cargando…

Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Ci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Koning, Chantal H. P., van den Heuvel, Sylvia P., Staal, J. Bart, Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M., Hendriks, Erik J. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3
_version_ 1782156814471659520
author de Koning, Chantal H. P.
van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.
Staal, J. Bart
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.
Hendriks, Erik J. M.
author_facet de Koning, Chantal H. P.
van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.
Staal, J. Bart
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.
Hendriks, Erik J. M.
author_sort de Koning, Chantal H. P.
collection PubMed
description The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.
format Text
id pubmed-2443270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24432702008-07-15 Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review de Koning, Chantal H. P. van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. Staal, J. Bart Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. Hendriks, Erik J. M. Eur Spine J Review Article The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently. Springer-Verlag 2008-04-22 2008-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2443270/ /pubmed/18427843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
de Koning, Chantal H. P.
van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.
Staal, J. Bart
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.
Hendriks, Erik J. M.
Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_full Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_short Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_sort clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dekoningchantalhp clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview
AT vandenheuvelsylviap clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview
AT staaljbart clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview
AT smitsengelsmanbouwiencm clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview
AT hendrikserikjm clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview