Cargando…
Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Ci...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3 |
_version_ | 1782156814471659520 |
---|---|
author | de Koning, Chantal H. P. van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. Staal, J. Bart Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. Hendriks, Erik J. M. |
author_facet | de Koning, Chantal H. P. van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. Staal, J. Bart Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. Hendriks, Erik J. M. |
author_sort | de Koning, Chantal H. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2443270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24432702008-07-15 Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review de Koning, Chantal H. P. van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. Staal, J. Bart Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. Hendriks, Erik J. M. Eur Spine J Review Article The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently. Springer-Verlag 2008-04-22 2008-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2443270/ /pubmed/18427843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article de Koning, Chantal H. P. van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. Staal, J. Bart Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. Hendriks, Erik J. M. Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title | Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_full | Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_short | Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_sort | clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekoningchantalhp clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview AT vandenheuvelsylviap clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview AT staaljbart clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview AT smitsengelsmanbouwiencm clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview AT hendrikserikjm clinimetricevaluationofactiverangeofmotionmeasuresinpatientswithnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview |