Cargando…

Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS

BACKGROUND: The causes of chronic low back pain (CLBP) remain obscure and effective treatment of symptoms remains elusive. A mechanism of relieving chronic pain based on the consequences of conflicting unpleasant sensory inputs to the central nervous system has been hypothesised. As a result a devic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barker, Karen L, Elliott, Christopher J, Sackley, Catherine M, Fairbank, Jeremy CT
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18588702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-97
_version_ 1782156847516483584
author Barker, Karen L
Elliott, Christopher J
Sackley, Catherine M
Fairbank, Jeremy CT
author_facet Barker, Karen L
Elliott, Christopher J
Sackley, Catherine M
Fairbank, Jeremy CT
author_sort Barker, Karen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The causes of chronic low back pain (CLBP) remain obscure and effective treatment of symptoms remains elusive. A mechanism of relieving chronic pain based on the consequences of conflicting unpleasant sensory inputs to the central nervous system has been hypothesised. As a result a device was generated to deliver sensory discrimination training (FairMed), and this randomised controlled trial compared therapeutic effects with a comparable treatment modality, TENS. METHODS: 60 patients with CLBP were recruited from physiotherapy referrals to a single-blinded, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. They were randomised to receive either FairMed or TENS and asked to use the allocated device for 30 minutes, twice a day, for 3 weeks. The primary outcome variable measured at 0 and 3 weeks was pain intensity measured using a visual analogue scale averaged over 7 days. Secondary outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index, 3 timed physical tests, 4 questionnaires assessing different aspects of emotional coping and a global measure of patient rating of change. Data were analysed for the difference in change of scores between groups using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The primary outcome, change in pain intensity (VAS) at 3 weeks showed a mean difference between groups of -0.1, (non significant p = 0.82). The mean difference in change in ODI scores was 0.4; (non significant p = 0.85). Differences in change of physical functioning showed that no significant difference in change of scores for any of these test (p = 0.58 – 0.90). Changes in scores of aspects of emotional coping also demonstrated no significant difference in change scores between the groups (p = 0.14 – 0.94). CONCLUSION: FairMed was not inferior to TENS treatment. The findings have implications for further research on current chronic pain theories and treatments. Further work to explore these mechanisms is important to expand our understanding of chronic pain and the role of neuro-modulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKCRN Study ID 3321
format Text
id pubmed-2443795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24437952008-07-08 Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS Barker, Karen L Elliott, Christopher J Sackley, Catherine M Fairbank, Jeremy CT BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The causes of chronic low back pain (CLBP) remain obscure and effective treatment of symptoms remains elusive. A mechanism of relieving chronic pain based on the consequences of conflicting unpleasant sensory inputs to the central nervous system has been hypothesised. As a result a device was generated to deliver sensory discrimination training (FairMed), and this randomised controlled trial compared therapeutic effects with a comparable treatment modality, TENS. METHODS: 60 patients with CLBP were recruited from physiotherapy referrals to a single-blinded, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. They were randomised to receive either FairMed or TENS and asked to use the allocated device for 30 minutes, twice a day, for 3 weeks. The primary outcome variable measured at 0 and 3 weeks was pain intensity measured using a visual analogue scale averaged over 7 days. Secondary outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index, 3 timed physical tests, 4 questionnaires assessing different aspects of emotional coping and a global measure of patient rating of change. Data were analysed for the difference in change of scores between groups using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The primary outcome, change in pain intensity (VAS) at 3 weeks showed a mean difference between groups of -0.1, (non significant p = 0.82). The mean difference in change in ODI scores was 0.4; (non significant p = 0.85). Differences in change of physical functioning showed that no significant difference in change of scores for any of these test (p = 0.58 – 0.90). Changes in scores of aspects of emotional coping also demonstrated no significant difference in change scores between the groups (p = 0.14 – 0.94). CONCLUSION: FairMed was not inferior to TENS treatment. The findings have implications for further research on current chronic pain theories and treatments. Further work to explore these mechanisms is important to expand our understanding of chronic pain and the role of neuro-modulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKCRN Study ID 3321 BioMed Central 2008-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2443795/ /pubmed/18588702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-97 Text en Copyright © 2008 Barker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barker, Karen L
Elliott, Christopher J
Sackley, Catherine M
Fairbank, Jeremy CT
Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS
title Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS
title_full Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS
title_fullStr Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS
title_short Treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. A Phase I RCT of a novel device (FairMed) vs. TENS
title_sort treatment of chronic back pain by sensory discrimination training. a phase i rct of a novel device (fairmed) vs. tens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18588702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-97
work_keys_str_mv AT barkerkarenl treatmentofchronicbackpainbysensorydiscriminationtrainingaphaseirctofanoveldevicefairmedvstens
AT elliottchristopherj treatmentofchronicbackpainbysensorydiscriminationtrainingaphaseirctofanoveldevicefairmedvstens
AT sackleycatherinem treatmentofchronicbackpainbysensorydiscriminationtrainingaphaseirctofanoveldevicefairmedvstens
AT fairbankjeremyct treatmentofchronicbackpainbysensorydiscriminationtrainingaphaseirctofanoveldevicefairmedvstens