Cargando…
Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review
The Working Group on Peer Review of the Advisory Committee to the Director of NIH has recommended that at least 4 reviewers should be used to assess each grant application. A sample size analysis of the number of reviewers needed to evaluate grant applications reveals that a substantially larger num...
Autores principales: | Kaplan, David, Lacetera, Nicola, Kaplan, Celia |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18648494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002761 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact
por: Lindner, Mark D., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF NIH PEER REVIEW: THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW
por: Femia, Elia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Correction: Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores
Publicado: (2015) -
Two changes that may help to improve NIH peer review
por: Aslin, Richard N.
Publicado: (2022)