Cargando…

Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials

Many studies have been conducted to try and find interventions to treat patients with severe sepsis, but with little success. In several cases, initial apparent beneficial effects have not been confirmed in later trials. The story of steroids in sepsis is one example of this pendulum effect, with in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vincent, Jean-Louis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6861
_version_ 1782156976082386944
author Vincent, Jean-Louis
author_facet Vincent, Jean-Louis
author_sort Vincent, Jean-Louis
collection PubMed
description Many studies have been conducted to try and find interventions to treat patients with severe sepsis, but with little success. In several cases, initial apparent beneficial effects have not been confirmed in later trials. The story of steroids in sepsis is one example of this pendulum effect, with initial success in the study by Annane et al. tempered by the more recent negative results of the Corticus study. The reasons for this pendulum effect are likely related, at least in part, to issues of clinical trial design and the way in which clinical trials in intensive care unit patients are developed, conducted and assessed needs to be critically reassessed.
format Text
id pubmed-2447597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24475972008-07-10 Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials Vincent, Jean-Louis Crit Care Commentary Many studies have been conducted to try and find interventions to treat patients with severe sepsis, but with little success. In several cases, initial apparent beneficial effects have not been confirmed in later trials. The story of steroids in sepsis is one example of this pendulum effect, with initial success in the study by Annane et al. tempered by the more recent negative results of the Corticus study. The reasons for this pendulum effect are likely related, at least in part, to issues of clinical trial design and the way in which clinical trials in intensive care unit patients are developed, conducted and assessed needs to be critically reassessed. BioMed Central 2008 2008-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2447597/ /pubmed/18466638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6861 Text en Copyright © 2008 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Vincent, Jean-Louis
Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
title Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
title_full Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
title_fullStr Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
title_short Steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
title_sort steroids in sepsis: another swing of the pendulum in our clinical trials
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18466638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6861
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentjeanlouis steroidsinsepsisanotherswingofthependuluminourclinicaltrials