Cargando…

An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Without specific strategies to address tracheostomy care on the wards, patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) with a tracheostomy may receive suboptimal care. We formed an intensivist-led multidisciplinary team to oversee ward management of such patients. To evaluate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tobin, Antony E, Santamaria, John D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18402705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6864
_version_ 1782156976538517504
author Tobin, Antony E
Santamaria, John D
author_facet Tobin, Antony E
Santamaria, John D
author_sort Tobin, Antony E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Without specific strategies to address tracheostomy care on the wards, patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) with a tracheostomy may receive suboptimal care. We formed an intensivist-led multidisciplinary team to oversee ward management of such patients. To evaluate the service, we compared outcomes for the first 3 years of the service with those in the year preceding the service. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected over the course of 3 years on ICU patients not under the care of the ear, nose, and throat unit who were discharged to the ward with a tracheostomy and compared with outcomes in the year preceding the introduction of the service. Principal outcomes were decannulation time, length of stay after ICU discharge, and stay of less than 43 days (upper trim point for the disease-related group [DRG] for tracheostomy). Analysis included trend by year and multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. P values of less than 0.05 were assumed to indicate statistical significance. As this was a quality assurance project, ethics approval was not required. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients were discharged with a tracheostomy over the course of a 4-year period: 41 in 2003, 60 in 2004, 95 in 2005, and 84 in 2006. Mean age was 61.8 (13.1) years, 176 (62.9%) were male, and mean APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score was 20.4 (6.4). Length of stay after ICU decreased over time (30 [13 to 52] versus 19 [10 to 34] days; P < 0.05 for trend), and a higher proportion of decannulated patients were discharged under the upper DRG trim point of 43 days (48% versus 66%; P < 0.05). Time to decannulation after ICU discharge decreased (14 [7 to 31] versus 7 [3 to 17] days; P < 0.01 for trend). Multivariate analysis showed that the hazard for decannulation increased by 24% (3% to 49%) per year. CONCLUSION: An intensivist-led tracheostomy team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay which may result in financial savings for institutions.
format Text
id pubmed-2447599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24475992008-07-10 An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study Tobin, Antony E Santamaria, John D Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Without specific strategies to address tracheostomy care on the wards, patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) with a tracheostomy may receive suboptimal care. We formed an intensivist-led multidisciplinary team to oversee ward management of such patients. To evaluate the service, we compared outcomes for the first 3 years of the service with those in the year preceding the service. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected over the course of 3 years on ICU patients not under the care of the ear, nose, and throat unit who were discharged to the ward with a tracheostomy and compared with outcomes in the year preceding the introduction of the service. Principal outcomes were decannulation time, length of stay after ICU discharge, and stay of less than 43 days (upper trim point for the disease-related group [DRG] for tracheostomy). Analysis included trend by year and multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. P values of less than 0.05 were assumed to indicate statistical significance. As this was a quality assurance project, ethics approval was not required. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients were discharged with a tracheostomy over the course of a 4-year period: 41 in 2003, 60 in 2004, 95 in 2005, and 84 in 2006. Mean age was 61.8 (13.1) years, 176 (62.9%) were male, and mean APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score was 20.4 (6.4). Length of stay after ICU decreased over time (30 [13 to 52] versus 19 [10 to 34] days; P < 0.05 for trend), and a higher proportion of decannulated patients were discharged under the upper DRG trim point of 43 days (48% versus 66%; P < 0.05). Time to decannulation after ICU discharge decreased (14 [7 to 31] versus 7 [3 to 17] days; P < 0.01 for trend). Multivariate analysis showed that the hazard for decannulation increased by 24% (3% to 49%) per year. CONCLUSION: An intensivist-led tracheostomy team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay which may result in financial savings for institutions. BioMed Central 2008 2008-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2447599/ /pubmed/18402705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6864 Text en Copyright © 2008 Tobin and Santamaria; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tobin, Antony E
Santamaria, John D
An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
title An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
title_full An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
title_short An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
title_sort intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18402705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6864
work_keys_str_mv AT tobinantonye anintensivistledtracheostomyreviewteamisassociatedwithshorterdecannulationtimeandlengthofstayaprospectivecohortstudy
AT santamariajohnd anintensivistledtracheostomyreviewteamisassociatedwithshorterdecannulationtimeandlengthofstayaprospectivecohortstudy
AT tobinantonye intensivistledtracheostomyreviewteamisassociatedwithshorterdecannulationtimeandlengthofstayaprospectivecohortstudy
AT santamariajohnd intensivistledtracheostomyreviewteamisassociatedwithshorterdecannulationtimeandlengthofstayaprospectivecohortstudy