Cargando…

Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Self-administered questionnaires are becoming increasingly common in general practice. Much research has explored methods to increase response rates but comparatively few studies have explored the effect of questionnaire administration on reported answers. METHODS: The aim of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desborough, James A, Butters, Peter, Bhattacharya, Debi, Holland, Richard C, Wright, David J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18588670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-42
_version_ 1782157013240774656
author Desborough, James A
Butters, Peter
Bhattacharya, Debi
Holland, Richard C
Wright, David J
author_facet Desborough, James A
Butters, Peter
Bhattacharya, Debi
Holland, Richard C
Wright, David J
author_sort Desborough, James A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-administered questionnaires are becoming increasingly common in general practice. Much research has explored methods to increase response rates but comparatively few studies have explored the effect of questionnaire administration on reported answers. METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect on responses of returning patient questionnaires to the respondents' medical practice or an independent researcher to questions relating to adherence and satisfaction with a GP consultation. One medical practice in Waveney primary care trust, Suffolk, England participated in this randomised trial. Patients over 18 years initiated on a new long-term medication during a consultation with a GP were randomly allocated to return a survey from their medical practice to either their medical practice or an independent researcher. The main outcome measures were self reported adherence, satisfaction with information about the newly prescribed medicine, the consultation and involvement in discussions. RESULTS: 274 (47%) patients responded to the questionnaire (45% medical practice, 48% independent researcher (95% CI -5 to 11%, p = 0.46)) and the groups appeared demographically comparable, although the high level of non-response limits the ability to assess this. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to total adherence or any of the satisfaction scales. Five (4%) patients reported altering doses of medication in the medical practice group compared with 18 (13%) in the researcher group (P = 0.009, Fisher's exact test). More patients in the medical practice group reported difficulties using their medication compared to the researcher group (46 (35%) v 30 (21%); p = 0.015, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Postal satisfaction questionnaires do not appear to be affected by whether they are returned to the patient's own medical practice or an independent researcher. However, returning postal questionnaires relating to detailed patient behaviours may be subject to response biases and further work is needed to explore this phenomena.
format Text
id pubmed-2447849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24478492008-07-10 Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial Desborough, James A Butters, Peter Bhattacharya, Debi Holland, Richard C Wright, David J BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-administered questionnaires are becoming increasingly common in general practice. Much research has explored methods to increase response rates but comparatively few studies have explored the effect of questionnaire administration on reported answers. METHODS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect on responses of returning patient questionnaires to the respondents' medical practice or an independent researcher to questions relating to adherence and satisfaction with a GP consultation. One medical practice in Waveney primary care trust, Suffolk, England participated in this randomised trial. Patients over 18 years initiated on a new long-term medication during a consultation with a GP were randomly allocated to return a survey from their medical practice to either their medical practice or an independent researcher. The main outcome measures were self reported adherence, satisfaction with information about the newly prescribed medicine, the consultation and involvement in discussions. RESULTS: 274 (47%) patients responded to the questionnaire (45% medical practice, 48% independent researcher (95% CI -5 to 11%, p = 0.46)) and the groups appeared demographically comparable, although the high level of non-response limits the ability to assess this. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to total adherence or any of the satisfaction scales. Five (4%) patients reported altering doses of medication in the medical practice group compared with 18 (13%) in the researcher group (P = 0.009, Fisher's exact test). More patients in the medical practice group reported difficulties using their medication compared to the researcher group (46 (35%) v 30 (21%); p = 0.015, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Postal satisfaction questionnaires do not appear to be affected by whether they are returned to the patient's own medical practice or an independent researcher. However, returning postal questionnaires relating to detailed patient behaviours may be subject to response biases and further work is needed to explore this phenomena. BioMed Central 2008-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2447849/ /pubmed/18588670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-42 Text en Copyright © 2008 Desborough et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Desborough, James A
Butters, Peter
Bhattacharya, Debi
Holland, Richard C
Wright, David J
Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial
title Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial
title_full Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial
title_fullStr Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial
title_short Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial
title_sort does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? the reply randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2447849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18588670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-42
work_keys_str_mv AT desboroughjamesa doesitmatterwhethertherecipientofpatientquestionnairesingeneralpracticeisthegeneralpractitioneroranindependentresearcherthereplyrandomisedtrial
AT butterspeter doesitmatterwhethertherecipientofpatientquestionnairesingeneralpracticeisthegeneralpractitioneroranindependentresearcherthereplyrandomisedtrial
AT bhattacharyadebi doesitmatterwhethertherecipientofpatientquestionnairesingeneralpracticeisthegeneralpractitioneroranindependentresearcherthereplyrandomisedtrial
AT hollandrichardc doesitmatterwhethertherecipientofpatientquestionnairesingeneralpracticeisthegeneralpractitioneroranindependentresearcherthereplyrandomisedtrial
AT wrightdavidj doesitmatterwhethertherecipientofpatientquestionnairesingeneralpracticeisthegeneralpractitioneroranindependentresearcherthereplyrandomisedtrial