Cargando…
Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training.
With the introduction of the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 (IRMER) the medical practitioner faces greater accountability when requesting radiological investigations. The referrer (usually a doctor or dentist) must supply sufficient medical data to justify...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ulster Medical Society
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2449209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11428319 |
_version_ | 1782157322957619200 |
---|---|
author | Bell, R. E. McLaughlin, R. E. |
author_facet | Bell, R. E. McLaughlin, R. E. |
author_sort | Bell, R. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the introduction of the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 (IRMER) the medical practitioner faces greater accountability when requesting radiological investigations. The referrer (usually a doctor or dentist) must supply sufficient medical data to justify radiation exposure to a patient. These regulations can lead to criminal prosecution if breached. Our objectives were to identify the level of unjustified requests for plain abdominal radiography among A&E doctors and whether there is a statistically significant difference in the justification of request between doctors of differing experience. We reviewed and prepared statistical analysis of 100 A&E request forms for plain abdominal radiography. Royal College of Radiologist Guidelines were used as a "Gold standard" for justification of the investigation. A&E doctors of less than six months experience are at greater risk of breaching these regulations when requesting plain abdominal films, when compared to more experienced doctors. This is a serious issue which should be addressed at undergraduate and pre-registration level in addition to ongoing audit. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2449209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | Ulster Medical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24492092008-07-10 Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. Bell, R. E. McLaughlin, R. E. Ulster Med J Research Article With the introduction of the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 (IRMER) the medical practitioner faces greater accountability when requesting radiological investigations. The referrer (usually a doctor or dentist) must supply sufficient medical data to justify radiation exposure to a patient. These regulations can lead to criminal prosecution if breached. Our objectives were to identify the level of unjustified requests for plain abdominal radiography among A&E doctors and whether there is a statistically significant difference in the justification of request between doctors of differing experience. We reviewed and prepared statistical analysis of 100 A&E request forms for plain abdominal radiography. Royal College of Radiologist Guidelines were used as a "Gold standard" for justification of the investigation. A&E doctors of less than six months experience are at greater risk of breaching these regulations when requesting plain abdominal films, when compared to more experienced doctors. This is a serious issue which should be addressed at undergraduate and pre-registration level in addition to ongoing audit. Ulster Medical Society 2001-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2449209/ /pubmed/11428319 Text en |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bell, R. E. McLaughlin, R. E. Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. |
title | Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. |
title_full | Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. |
title_fullStr | Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. |
title_full_unstemmed | Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. |
title_short | Ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (Northern Ireland) 2000 and their implications for Accident and Emergency (A&E) doctors in training. |
title_sort | ionising radiation (medical exposure) regulations (northern ireland) 2000 and their implications for accident and emergency (a&e) doctors in training. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2449209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11428319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellre ionisingradiationmedicalexposureregulationsnorthernireland2000andtheirimplicationsforaccidentandemergencyaedoctorsintraining AT mclaughlinre ionisingradiationmedicalexposureregulationsnorthernireland2000andtheirimplicationsforaccidentandemergencyaedoctorsintraining |