Cargando…
Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2453012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604420 |
_version_ | 1782157334999465984 |
---|---|
author | Herschbach, P Book, K Brandl, T Keller, M Lindena, G Neuwöhner, K Marten-Mittag, B |
author_facet | Herschbach, P Book, K Brandl, T Keller, M Lindena, G Neuwöhner, K Marten-Mittag, B |
author_sort | Herschbach, P |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105 institutions. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of setting variables indicated that patients treated in palliative care settings showed highest distress scores compared to patients recruited from hospitals and outpatient clinics (P<0.001). Significant differences were also found for contact initiative (P<0.001); lowest distress was found in patients who were recruited by routine contact. Patients who asked for psychosocial support or who were recruited by the medical staff showed the highest distress scores. The analysis of therapy groups showed that patients receiving radiotherapy or surgery were not more distressed than patients without therapy. The most distressing treatment was chemotherapy. Gender had differential effects on clinic type (P<0.001) and contact initiative (P<0.001) but not on treatment and diagnosis. Expert rating scales are an important complement for self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate psychological distress of cancer patients in psychosocial studies as well as in routine medical care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2453012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24530122009-09-11 Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale Herschbach, P Book, K Brandl, T Keller, M Lindena, G Neuwöhner, K Marten-Mittag, B Br J Cancer Clinical Study The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105 institutions. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of setting variables indicated that patients treated in palliative care settings showed highest distress scores compared to patients recruited from hospitals and outpatient clinics (P<0.001). Significant differences were also found for contact initiative (P<0.001); lowest distress was found in patients who were recruited by routine contact. Patients who asked for psychosocial support or who were recruited by the medical staff showed the highest distress scores. The analysis of therapy groups showed that patients receiving radiotherapy or surgery were not more distressed than patients without therapy. The most distressing treatment was chemotherapy. Gender had differential effects on clinic type (P<0.001) and contact initiative (P<0.001) but not on treatment and diagnosis. Expert rating scales are an important complement for self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate psychological distress of cancer patients in psychosocial studies as well as in routine medical care. Nature Publishing Group 2008-07-08 2008-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2453012/ /pubmed/18577997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604420 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Herschbach, P Book, K Brandl, T Keller, M Lindena, G Neuwöhner, K Marten-Mittag, B Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
title | Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
title_full | Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
title_fullStr | Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
title_short | Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
title_sort | psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2453012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herschbachp psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale AT bookk psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale AT brandlt psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale AT kellerm psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale AT lindenag psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale AT neuwohnerk psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale AT martenmittagb psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale |