Cargando…

Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale

The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herschbach, P, Book, K, Brandl, T, Keller, M, Lindena, G, Neuwöhner, K, Marten-Mittag, B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2453012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604420
_version_ 1782157334999465984
author Herschbach, P
Book, K
Brandl, T
Keller, M
Lindena, G
Neuwöhner, K
Marten-Mittag, B
author_facet Herschbach, P
Book, K
Brandl, T
Keller, M
Lindena, G
Neuwöhner, K
Marten-Mittag, B
author_sort Herschbach, P
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105 institutions. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of setting variables indicated that patients treated in palliative care settings showed highest distress scores compared to patients recruited from hospitals and outpatient clinics (P<0.001). Significant differences were also found for contact initiative (P<0.001); lowest distress was found in patients who were recruited by routine contact. Patients who asked for psychosocial support or who were recruited by the medical staff showed the highest distress scores. The analysis of therapy groups showed that patients receiving radiotherapy or surgery were not more distressed than patients without therapy. The most distressing treatment was chemotherapy. Gender had differential effects on clinic type (P<0.001) and contact initiative (P<0.001) but not on treatment and diagnosis. Expert rating scales are an important complement for self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate psychological distress of cancer patients in psychosocial studies as well as in routine medical care.
format Text
id pubmed-2453012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24530122009-09-11 Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale Herschbach, P Book, K Brandl, T Keller, M Lindena, G Neuwöhner, K Marten-Mittag, B Br J Cancer Clinical Study The purpose of this study was to investigate psychosocial stress in a large sample of cancer patients using an expert rating scale. Specific aims were to analyse the relevance of setting variables (type of clinic, contact initiative, therapy) and gender. A total of 6365 patients were assessed in 105 institutions. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of setting variables indicated that patients treated in palliative care settings showed highest distress scores compared to patients recruited from hospitals and outpatient clinics (P<0.001). Significant differences were also found for contact initiative (P<0.001); lowest distress was found in patients who were recruited by routine contact. Patients who asked for psychosocial support or who were recruited by the medical staff showed the highest distress scores. The analysis of therapy groups showed that patients receiving radiotherapy or surgery were not more distressed than patients without therapy. The most distressing treatment was chemotherapy. Gender had differential effects on clinic type (P<0.001) and contact initiative (P<0.001) but not on treatment and diagnosis. Expert rating scales are an important complement for self-assessment questionnaires to evaluate psychological distress of cancer patients in psychosocial studies as well as in routine medical care. Nature Publishing Group 2008-07-08 2008-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2453012/ /pubmed/18577997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604420 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Herschbach, P
Book, K
Brandl, T
Keller, M
Lindena, G
Neuwöhner, K
Marten-Mittag, B
Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
title Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
title_full Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
title_fullStr Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
title_full_unstemmed Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
title_short Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
title_sort psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2453012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604420
work_keys_str_mv AT herschbachp psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale
AT bookk psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale
AT brandlt psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale
AT kellerm psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale
AT lindenag psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale
AT neuwohnerk psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale
AT martenmittagb psychologicaldistressincancerpatientsassessedwithanexpertratingscale