Cargando…

Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey

We assessed the undercount of meningiomas in a population-based cancer registry. A comprehensive material was formed by compiling hospital sources with the Finnish Cancer Registry database. The completeness of each source ranged 62–69%. The corrected age-standardised meningioma incidence was 2.9/100...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larjavaara, S, Haapasalo, H, Sankila, R, Helén, P, Auvinen, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2453036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604438
_version_ 1782157340672262144
author Larjavaara, S
Haapasalo, H
Sankila, R
Helén, P
Auvinen, A
author_facet Larjavaara, S
Haapasalo, H
Sankila, R
Helén, P
Auvinen, A
author_sort Larjavaara, S
collection PubMed
description We assessed the undercount of meningiomas in a population-based cancer registry. A comprehensive material was formed by compiling hospital sources with the Finnish Cancer Registry database. The completeness of each source ranged 62–69%. The corrected age-standardised meningioma incidence was 2.9/100 000 for men and 13.0/100 000 for women, a third higher than the cancer registry figures.
format Text
id pubmed-2453036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24530362009-09-11 Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey Larjavaara, S Haapasalo, H Sankila, R Helén, P Auvinen, A Br J Cancer Short Communication We assessed the undercount of meningiomas in a population-based cancer registry. A comprehensive material was formed by compiling hospital sources with the Finnish Cancer Registry database. The completeness of each source ranged 62–69%. The corrected age-standardised meningioma incidence was 2.9/100 000 for men and 13.0/100 000 for women, a third higher than the cancer registry figures. Nature Publishing Group 2008-07-08 2008-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2453036/ /pubmed/18577989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604438 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Larjavaara, S
Haapasalo, H
Sankila, R
Helén, P
Auvinen, A
Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey
title Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey
title_full Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey
title_fullStr Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey
title_full_unstemmed Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey
title_short Is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? A regional survey
title_sort is the incidence of meningiomas underestimated? a regional survey
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2453036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18577989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604438
work_keys_str_mv AT larjavaaras istheincidenceofmeningiomasunderestimatedaregionalsurvey
AT haapasaloh istheincidenceofmeningiomasunderestimatedaregionalsurvey
AT sankilar istheincidenceofmeningiomasunderestimatedaregionalsurvey
AT helenp istheincidenceofmeningiomasunderestimatedaregionalsurvey
AT auvinena istheincidenceofmeningiomasunderestimatedaregionalsurvey