Cargando…
Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care
BACKGROUND: Short-term medical missions (STMMs) are a well-established means of providing health care to the developing world. Despite over 250 million dollars and thousands of volunteer hours dedicated to STMMs, there is a lack of standardized evaluation to assess patient safety, quality control, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2464597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-121 |
_version_ | 1782157427309805568 |
---|---|
author | Maki, Jesse Qualls, Munirih White, Benjamin Kleefield, Sharon Crone, Robert |
author_facet | Maki, Jesse Qualls, Munirih White, Benjamin Kleefield, Sharon Crone, Robert |
author_sort | Maki, Jesse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Short-term medical missions (STMMs) are a well-established means of providing health care to the developing world. Despite over 250 million dollars and thousands of volunteer hours dedicated to STMMs, there is a lack of standardized evaluation to assess patient safety, quality control, and mission impact. The objective of this project is to design and implement an assessment tool that defines objective parameters of quality of care as identified by STMMs. METHODS: The study was conducted in 3 phases: 1) Base-need analysis to determine factors critical to the quality of STMMs, 2) Design of 5 surveys for mission personnel and patients to enable 360-degree evaluation based on factors from phase 1, and 3) Field testing of the surveys with 5 STMMs. RESULTS: An evaluation tool was created assessing 6 major and 30 minor factors identified as important to the quality of STMMs. 5 mission directors, 43 personnel, 10 local hosts, and 55 patients completed the surveys. Of the 6 major measures of quality, missions performed best in Cost (mean score 86%), and Impact (84%). The poorest performance was in Education (64%). Efficiency, Sustainability, and Preparedness showed mean scores of 76%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a novel standardized tool for STMM evaluation. Use of the assessment instrument identified areas of strength and weakness of a particular mission, and delineated general trends in performance compared to other STMMs. We anticipate that the use of this tool may improve the quality of care provided by missions, and stimulate solution-sharing and scholarly discussion among missions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2464597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24645972008-07-15 Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care Maki, Jesse Qualls, Munirih White, Benjamin Kleefield, Sharon Crone, Robert BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Short-term medical missions (STMMs) are a well-established means of providing health care to the developing world. Despite over 250 million dollars and thousands of volunteer hours dedicated to STMMs, there is a lack of standardized evaluation to assess patient safety, quality control, and mission impact. The objective of this project is to design and implement an assessment tool that defines objective parameters of quality of care as identified by STMMs. METHODS: The study was conducted in 3 phases: 1) Base-need analysis to determine factors critical to the quality of STMMs, 2) Design of 5 surveys for mission personnel and patients to enable 360-degree evaluation based on factors from phase 1, and 3) Field testing of the surveys with 5 STMMs. RESULTS: An evaluation tool was created assessing 6 major and 30 minor factors identified as important to the quality of STMMs. 5 mission directors, 43 personnel, 10 local hosts, and 55 patients completed the surveys. Of the 6 major measures of quality, missions performed best in Cost (mean score 86%), and Impact (84%). The poorest performance was in Education (64%). Efficiency, Sustainability, and Preparedness showed mean scores of 76%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a novel standardized tool for STMM evaluation. Use of the assessment instrument identified areas of strength and weakness of a particular mission, and delineated general trends in performance compared to other STMMs. We anticipate that the use of this tool may improve the quality of care provided by missions, and stimulate solution-sharing and scholarly discussion among missions. BioMed Central 2008-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2464597/ /pubmed/18518997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-121 Text en Copyright © 2008 Maki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maki, Jesse Qualls, Munirih White, Benjamin Kleefield, Sharon Crone, Robert Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care |
title | Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care |
title_full | Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care |
title_fullStr | Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care |
title_full_unstemmed | Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care |
title_short | Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: A methods study to evaluate quality of care |
title_sort | health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2464597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18518997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makijesse healthimpactassessmentandshorttermmedicalmissionsamethodsstudytoevaluatequalityofcare AT quallsmunirih healthimpactassessmentandshorttermmedicalmissionsamethodsstudytoevaluatequalityofcare AT whitebenjamin healthimpactassessmentandshorttermmedicalmissionsamethodsstudytoevaluatequalityofcare AT kleefieldsharon healthimpactassessmentandshorttermmedicalmissionsamethodsstudytoevaluatequalityofcare AT cronerobert healthimpactassessmentandshorttermmedicalmissionsamethodsstudytoevaluatequalityofcare |