Cargando…

Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila

Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schipanski, Angela, Yarali, Ayse, Niewalda, Thomas, Gerber, Bertram
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2467463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18511478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn024
_version_ 1782157458723045376
author Schipanski, Angela
Yarali, Ayse
Niewalda, Thomas
Gerber, Bertram
author_facet Schipanski, Angela
Yarali, Ayse
Niewalda, Thomas
Gerber, Bertram
author_sort Schipanski, Angela
collection PubMed
description Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to use the dose–effect characteristics as behavioral “fingerprints” to dissociate reflexive and reinforcing functions. For glucose and trehalose, we uncover relatively weak preference. In contrast, for fructose and sucrose, preference responses are strong and the effects on feeding pronounced. Specifically, larvae are attracted to, and feeding is stimulated most strongly for, intermediate concentrations of either sugar: Using very high concentrations (4 M) results in weakened preference and suppression of feeding. In contrast to such an optimum function regarding choice and feeding, an asymptotic dose–effect function is found for reinforcement learning: Learning scores reach asymptote at 2 M and remain stable for a 4-M concentration. A similar parametric discrepancy between the reflexive (choice and feeding) and reinforcing function is also seen for sodium chloride (Niewalda T, Singhal S, Fiala A, Saumweber T, Wegener S, Gerber B, in preparation). We discuss whether these discrepancies are based either on inhibition from high-osmolarity sensors upon specifically the reflexive pathways or whether different sensory pathways, with different effective dose–response characteristics, may have preferential access to drive either reflex responses or modulatory neurons mediating internal reinforcement, respectively.
format Text
id pubmed-2467463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24674632009-02-25 Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila Schipanski, Angela Yarali, Ayse Niewalda, Thomas Gerber, Bertram Chem Senses Articles Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to use the dose–effect characteristics as behavioral “fingerprints” to dissociate reflexive and reinforcing functions. For glucose and trehalose, we uncover relatively weak preference. In contrast, for fructose and sucrose, preference responses are strong and the effects on feeding pronounced. Specifically, larvae are attracted to, and feeding is stimulated most strongly for, intermediate concentrations of either sugar: Using very high concentrations (4 M) results in weakened preference and suppression of feeding. In contrast to such an optimum function regarding choice and feeding, an asymptotic dose–effect function is found for reinforcement learning: Learning scores reach asymptote at 2 M and remain stable for a 4-M concentration. A similar parametric discrepancy between the reflexive (choice and feeding) and reinforcing function is also seen for sodium chloride (Niewalda T, Singhal S, Fiala A, Saumweber T, Wegener S, Gerber B, in preparation). We discuss whether these discrepancies are based either on inhibition from high-osmolarity sensors upon specifically the reflexive pathways or whether different sensory pathways, with different effective dose–response characteristics, may have preferential access to drive either reflex responses or modulatory neurons mediating internal reinforcement, respectively. Oxford University Press 2008-07 2008-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2467463/ /pubmed/18511478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn024 Text en © 2008 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Schipanski, Angela
Yarali, Ayse
Niewalda, Thomas
Gerber, Bertram
Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
title Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
title_full Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
title_fullStr Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
title_short Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
title_sort behavioral analyses of sugar processing in choice, feeding, and learning in larval drosophila
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2467463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18511478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn024
work_keys_str_mv AT schipanskiangela behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila
AT yaraliayse behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila
AT niewaldathomas behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila
AT gerberbertram behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila