Cargando…
Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila
Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2467463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18511478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn024 |
_version_ | 1782157458723045376 |
---|---|
author | Schipanski, Angela Yarali, Ayse Niewalda, Thomas Gerber, Bertram |
author_facet | Schipanski, Angela Yarali, Ayse Niewalda, Thomas Gerber, Bertram |
author_sort | Schipanski, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to use the dose–effect characteristics as behavioral “fingerprints” to dissociate reflexive and reinforcing functions. For glucose and trehalose, we uncover relatively weak preference. In contrast, for fructose and sucrose, preference responses are strong and the effects on feeding pronounced. Specifically, larvae are attracted to, and feeding is stimulated most strongly for, intermediate concentrations of either sugar: Using very high concentrations (4 M) results in weakened preference and suppression of feeding. In contrast to such an optimum function regarding choice and feeding, an asymptotic dose–effect function is found for reinforcement learning: Learning scores reach asymptote at 2 M and remain stable for a 4-M concentration. A similar parametric discrepancy between the reflexive (choice and feeding) and reinforcing function is also seen for sodium chloride (Niewalda T, Singhal S, Fiala A, Saumweber T, Wegener S, Gerber B, in preparation). We discuss whether these discrepancies are based either on inhibition from high-osmolarity sensors upon specifically the reflexive pathways or whether different sensory pathways, with different effective dose–response characteristics, may have preferential access to drive either reflex responses or modulatory neurons mediating internal reinforcement, respectively. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2467463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24674632009-02-25 Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila Schipanski, Angela Yarali, Ayse Niewalda, Thomas Gerber, Bertram Chem Senses Articles Gustatory stimuli have at least 2 kinds of function: They can support immediate, reflexive responses (such as substrate choice and feeding) and they can drive internal reinforcement. We provide behavioral analyses of these functions with respect to sweet taste in larval Drosophila. The idea is to use the dose–effect characteristics as behavioral “fingerprints” to dissociate reflexive and reinforcing functions. For glucose and trehalose, we uncover relatively weak preference. In contrast, for fructose and sucrose, preference responses are strong and the effects on feeding pronounced. Specifically, larvae are attracted to, and feeding is stimulated most strongly for, intermediate concentrations of either sugar: Using very high concentrations (4 M) results in weakened preference and suppression of feeding. In contrast to such an optimum function regarding choice and feeding, an asymptotic dose–effect function is found for reinforcement learning: Learning scores reach asymptote at 2 M and remain stable for a 4-M concentration. A similar parametric discrepancy between the reflexive (choice and feeding) and reinforcing function is also seen for sodium chloride (Niewalda T, Singhal S, Fiala A, Saumweber T, Wegener S, Gerber B, in preparation). We discuss whether these discrepancies are based either on inhibition from high-osmolarity sensors upon specifically the reflexive pathways or whether different sensory pathways, with different effective dose–response characteristics, may have preferential access to drive either reflex responses or modulatory neurons mediating internal reinforcement, respectively. Oxford University Press 2008-07 2008-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2467463/ /pubmed/18511478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn024 Text en © 2008 The Authors This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Schipanski, Angela Yarali, Ayse Niewalda, Thomas Gerber, Bertram Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila |
title | Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila |
title_full | Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila |
title_fullStr | Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila |
title_short | Behavioral Analyses of Sugar Processing in Choice, Feeding, and Learning in Larval Drosophila |
title_sort | behavioral analyses of sugar processing in choice, feeding, and learning in larval drosophila |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2467463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18511478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schipanskiangela behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila AT yaraliayse behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila AT niewaldathomas behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila AT gerberbertram behavioralanalysesofsugarprocessinginchoicefeedingandlearninginlarvaldrosophila |