Cargando…

Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review

Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lange, Marilyne M., Buunen, Mark, van de Velde, Cornelis J. H., Lange, Johan F.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2468314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18483828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y
_version_ 1782157471770476544
author Lange, Marilyne M.
Buunen, Mark
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
Lange, Johan F.
author_facet Lange, Marilyne M.
Buunen, Mark
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
Lange, Johan F.
author_sort Lange, Marilyne M.
collection PubMed
description Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), and ligation at a level without any intraoperative definition of the inferior mesenteric or superior rectal arteries. Publications concerning the level of ligation in rectal cancer surgery were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three articles that evaluated oncologic outcome (n = 14), anastomotic circulation (n = 5), autonomous innervation (n = 5), and tension on the anastomosis/anastomotic leakage (n = 2) matched our selection criteria and were systematically reviewed. There is insufficient evidence to support high tie as the technique of choice. Furthermore, high tie has been proven to decrease perfusion and innervation of the proximal limb. It is concluded that neither the high tie strategy nor the low tie strategy is evidence based and that low tie is anatomically less invasive with respect to circulation and autonomous innervation of the proximal limb of anastomosis. As a consequence, in rectal cancer surgery low tie should be the preferred method.
format Text
id pubmed-2468314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24683142008-07-16 Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review Lange, Marilyne M. Buunen, Mark van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Lange, Johan F. Dis Colon Rectum Current Status Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), and ligation at a level without any intraoperative definition of the inferior mesenteric or superior rectal arteries. Publications concerning the level of ligation in rectal cancer surgery were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three articles that evaluated oncologic outcome (n = 14), anastomotic circulation (n = 5), autonomous innervation (n = 5), and tension on the anastomosis/anastomotic leakage (n = 2) matched our selection criteria and were systematically reviewed. There is insufficient evidence to support high tie as the technique of choice. Furthermore, high tie has been proven to decrease perfusion and innervation of the proximal limb. It is concluded that neither the high tie strategy nor the low tie strategy is evidence based and that low tie is anatomically less invasive with respect to circulation and autonomous innervation of the proximal limb of anastomosis. As a consequence, in rectal cancer surgery low tie should be the preferred method. Springer-Verlag 2008-05-16 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2468314/ /pubmed/18483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Current Status
Lange, Marilyne M.
Buunen, Mark
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
Lange, Johan F.
Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
title Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
title_full Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
title_fullStr Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
title_full_unstemmed Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
title_short Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
title_sort level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. a review
topic Current Status
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2468314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18483828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y
work_keys_str_mv AT langemarilynem levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview
AT buunenmark levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview
AT vandeveldecornelisjh levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview
AT langejohanf levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview