Cargando…
Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review
Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2468314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y |
_version_ | 1782157471770476544 |
---|---|
author | Lange, Marilyne M. Buunen, Mark van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Lange, Johan F. |
author_facet | Lange, Marilyne M. Buunen, Mark van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Lange, Johan F. |
author_sort | Lange, Marilyne M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), and ligation at a level without any intraoperative definition of the inferior mesenteric or superior rectal arteries. Publications concerning the level of ligation in rectal cancer surgery were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three articles that evaluated oncologic outcome (n = 14), anastomotic circulation (n = 5), autonomous innervation (n = 5), and tension on the anastomosis/anastomotic leakage (n = 2) matched our selection criteria and were systematically reviewed. There is insufficient evidence to support high tie as the technique of choice. Furthermore, high tie has been proven to decrease perfusion and innervation of the proximal limb. It is concluded that neither the high tie strategy nor the low tie strategy is evidence based and that low tie is anatomically less invasive with respect to circulation and autonomous innervation of the proximal limb of anastomosis. As a consequence, in rectal cancer surgery low tie should be the preferred method. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2468314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24683142008-07-16 Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review Lange, Marilyne M. Buunen, Mark van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Lange, Johan F. Dis Colon Rectum Current Status Consensus does not exist on the level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery. From oncologic considerations, many surgeons apply high tie arterial ligation (level of inferior mesenteric artery). Other strategies include ligation at the level of the superior rectal artery, just caudally to the origin of the left colic artery (low tie), and ligation at a level without any intraoperative definition of the inferior mesenteric or superior rectal arteries. Publications concerning the level of ligation in rectal cancer surgery were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three articles that evaluated oncologic outcome (n = 14), anastomotic circulation (n = 5), autonomous innervation (n = 5), and tension on the anastomosis/anastomotic leakage (n = 2) matched our selection criteria and were systematically reviewed. There is insufficient evidence to support high tie as the technique of choice. Furthermore, high tie has been proven to decrease perfusion and innervation of the proximal limb. It is concluded that neither the high tie strategy nor the low tie strategy is evidence based and that low tie is anatomically less invasive with respect to circulation and autonomous innervation of the proximal limb of anastomosis. As a consequence, in rectal cancer surgery low tie should be the preferred method. Springer-Verlag 2008-05-16 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC2468314/ /pubmed/18483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Current Status Lange, Marilyne M. Buunen, Mark van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. Lange, Johan F. Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review |
title | Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review |
title_full | Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review |
title_fullStr | Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review |
title_short | Level of Arterial Ligation in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Low Tie Preferred over High Tie. A Review |
title_sort | level of arterial ligation in rectal cancer surgery: low tie preferred over high tie. a review |
topic | Current Status |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2468314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18483828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9328-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langemarilynem levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview AT buunenmark levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview AT vandeveldecornelisjh levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview AT langejohanf levelofarterialligationinrectalcancersurgerylowtiepreferredoverhightieareview |