Cargando…

Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography

Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varnero, Silvia, Santagata, Patricia, Pratali, Lorenza, Basso, Massimiliano, Gandolfo, Alfredo, Bellotti, Paolo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18570640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-6-31
_version_ 1782157483671814144
author Varnero, Silvia
Santagata, Patricia
Pratali, Lorenza
Basso, Massimiliano
Gandolfo, Alfredo
Bellotti, Paolo
author_facet Varnero, Silvia
Santagata, Patricia
Pratali, Lorenza
Basso, Massimiliano
Gandolfo, Alfredo
Bellotti, Paolo
author_sort Varnero, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 ± 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased – array 1.6–2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2–4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 × 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 ± 21 sec vs 40 ± 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 ± 0.5 min for 2D and 13 ± 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 ± 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use.
format Text
id pubmed-2474587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24745872008-07-17 Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography Varnero, Silvia Santagata, Patricia Pratali, Lorenza Basso, Massimiliano Gandolfo, Alfredo Bellotti, Paolo Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 ± 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased – array 1.6–2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2–4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 × 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 ± 21 sec vs 40 ± 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 ± 0.5 min for 2D and 13 ± 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 ± 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use. BioMed Central 2008-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2474587/ /pubmed/18570640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-6-31 Text en Copyright © 2008 Varnero et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Varnero, Silvia
Santagata, Patricia
Pratali, Lorenza
Basso, Massimiliano
Gandolfo, Alfredo
Bellotti, Paolo
Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
title Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
title_full Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
title_fullStr Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
title_short Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
title_sort head to head comparison of 2d vs real time 3d dipyridamole stress echocardiography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18570640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-6-31
work_keys_str_mv AT varnerosilvia headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography
AT santagatapatricia headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography
AT pratalilorenza headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography
AT bassomassimiliano headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography
AT gandolfoalfredo headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography
AT bellottipaolo headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography