Cargando…
Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18570640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-6-31 |
_version_ | 1782157483671814144 |
---|---|
author | Varnero, Silvia Santagata, Patricia Pratali, Lorenza Basso, Massimiliano Gandolfo, Alfredo Bellotti, Paolo |
author_facet | Varnero, Silvia Santagata, Patricia Pratali, Lorenza Basso, Massimiliano Gandolfo, Alfredo Bellotti, Paolo |
author_sort | Varnero, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 ± 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased – array 1.6–2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2–4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 × 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 ± 21 sec vs 40 ± 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 ± 0.5 min for 2D and 13 ± 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 ± 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2474587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24745872008-07-17 Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography Varnero, Silvia Santagata, Patricia Pratali, Lorenza Basso, Massimiliano Gandolfo, Alfredo Bellotti, Paolo Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 ± 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased – array 1.6–2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2–4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 × 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 ± 21 sec vs 40 ± 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 ± 0.5 min for 2D and 13 ± 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 ± 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use. BioMed Central 2008-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2474587/ /pubmed/18570640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-6-31 Text en Copyright © 2008 Varnero et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Varnero, Silvia Santagata, Patricia Pratali, Lorenza Basso, Massimiliano Gandolfo, Alfredo Bellotti, Paolo Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
title | Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
title_full | Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
title_short | Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
title_sort | head to head comparison of 2d vs real time 3d dipyridamole stress echocardiography |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18570640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-6-31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varnerosilvia headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography AT santagatapatricia headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography AT pratalilorenza headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography AT bassomassimiliano headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography AT gandolfoalfredo headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography AT bellottipaolo headtoheadcomparisonof2dvsrealtime3ddipyridamolestressechocardiography |