Cargando…
Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
BACKGROUND: In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18593458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-14 |
_version_ | 1782157508184375296 |
---|---|
author | Strigari, Lidia Benassi, Marcello De Felice, Pierino D'Andrea, Marco Fazio, Aldo Nocentini, Sandro d'Angelo, Annelisa Ceccatelli, Alessia |
author_facet | Strigari, Lidia Benassi, Marcello De Felice, Pierino D'Andrea, Marco Fazio, Aldo Nocentini, Sandro d'Angelo, Annelisa Ceccatelli, Alessia |
author_sort | Strigari, Lidia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator. METHODS: Calibrator response is a function of the measurement geometry and, in particular, it depends on the syringe type and filling volume. To minimize the uncertainty associated with the measured activity of the syringe, it is necessary to calculate a calibration curve depending on filling volume for each syringe type. This curve can be obtained by fitting experimentally determined volume correction factors. RESULTS: A theoretical evaluation of volume correction factors for syringes is reported for three different experimental methods. The aim is to determine the most accurate experimental method among those considered, by examining the expression of uncertainty for the correction factor. This theoretical analysis was then tested experimentally. CONCLUSION: The agreement between the experimental data obtained in the constant activity method and gravimetric method at constant specific activity and the small associated uncertainties show the accuracy of these two procedures; while the volumetric method at constant specific activity could lead to a wrong evaluation of the correction factors. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2474841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-24748412008-07-21 Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements Strigari, Lidia Benassi, Marcello De Felice, Pierino D'Andrea, Marco Fazio, Aldo Nocentini, Sandro d'Angelo, Annelisa Ceccatelli, Alessia J Exp Clin Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator. METHODS: Calibrator response is a function of the measurement geometry and, in particular, it depends on the syringe type and filling volume. To minimize the uncertainty associated with the measured activity of the syringe, it is necessary to calculate a calibration curve depending on filling volume for each syringe type. This curve can be obtained by fitting experimentally determined volume correction factors. RESULTS: A theoretical evaluation of volume correction factors for syringes is reported for three different experimental methods. The aim is to determine the most accurate experimental method among those considered, by examining the expression of uncertainty for the correction factor. This theoretical analysis was then tested experimentally. CONCLUSION: The agreement between the experimental data obtained in the constant activity method and gravimetric method at constant specific activity and the small associated uncertainties show the accuracy of these two procedures; while the volumetric method at constant specific activity could lead to a wrong evaluation of the correction factors. BioMed Central 2008-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2474841/ /pubmed/18593458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-14 Text en Copyright © 2008 Strigari et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Strigari, Lidia Benassi, Marcello De Felice, Pierino D'Andrea, Marco Fazio, Aldo Nocentini, Sandro d'Angelo, Annelisa Ceccatelli, Alessia Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
title | Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
title_full | Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
title_fullStr | Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
title_short | Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
title_sort | comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18593458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-27-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strigarilidia comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT benassimarcello comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT defelicepierino comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT dandreamarco comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT fazioaldo comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT nocentinisandro comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT dangeloannelisa comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements AT ceccatellialessia comparisonofmethodstodetermineaccuratedosecalibratoractivitymeasurements |