Cargando…

Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System

For sensory signals to control an animal's behavior, they must first be transformed into a format appropriate for use by its motor systems. This fundamental problem is faced by all animals, including humans. Beyond simple reflexes, little is known about how such sensorimotor transformations tak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huston, Stephen J, Krapp, Holger G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2475543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18651791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060173
_version_ 1782157558175236096
author Huston, Stephen J
Krapp, Holger G
author_facet Huston, Stephen J
Krapp, Holger G
author_sort Huston, Stephen J
collection PubMed
description For sensory signals to control an animal's behavior, they must first be transformed into a format appropriate for use by its motor systems. This fundamental problem is faced by all animals, including humans. Beyond simple reflexes, little is known about how such sensorimotor transformations take place. Here we describe how the outputs of a well-characterized population of fly visual interneurons, lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs), are used by the animal's gaze-stabilizing neck motor system. The LPTCs respond to visual input arising from both self-rotations and translations of the fly. The neck motor system however is involved in gaze stabilization and thus mainly controls compensatory head rotations. We investigated how the neck motor system is able to selectively extract rotation information from the mixed responses of the LPTCs. We recorded extracellularly from fly neck motor neurons (NMNs) and mapped the directional preferences across their extended visual receptive fields. Our results suggest that—like the tangential cells—NMNs are tuned to panoramic retinal image shifts, or optic flow fields, which occur when the fly rotates about particular body axes. In many cases, tangential cells and motor neurons appear to be tuned to similar axes of rotation, resulting in a correlation between the coordinate systems the two neural populations employ. However, in contrast to the primarily monocular receptive fields of the tangential cells, most NMNs are sensitive to visual motion presented to either eye. This results in the NMNs being more selective for rotation than the LPTCs. Thus, the neck motor system increases its rotation selectivity by a comparatively simple mechanism: the integration of binocular visual motion information.
format Text
id pubmed-2475543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24755432008-07-22 Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System Huston, Stephen J Krapp, Holger G PLoS Biol Research Article For sensory signals to control an animal's behavior, they must first be transformed into a format appropriate for use by its motor systems. This fundamental problem is faced by all animals, including humans. Beyond simple reflexes, little is known about how such sensorimotor transformations take place. Here we describe how the outputs of a well-characterized population of fly visual interneurons, lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs), are used by the animal's gaze-stabilizing neck motor system. The LPTCs respond to visual input arising from both self-rotations and translations of the fly. The neck motor system however is involved in gaze stabilization and thus mainly controls compensatory head rotations. We investigated how the neck motor system is able to selectively extract rotation information from the mixed responses of the LPTCs. We recorded extracellularly from fly neck motor neurons (NMNs) and mapped the directional preferences across their extended visual receptive fields. Our results suggest that—like the tangential cells—NMNs are tuned to panoramic retinal image shifts, or optic flow fields, which occur when the fly rotates about particular body axes. In many cases, tangential cells and motor neurons appear to be tuned to similar axes of rotation, resulting in a correlation between the coordinate systems the two neural populations employ. However, in contrast to the primarily monocular receptive fields of the tangential cells, most NMNs are sensitive to visual motion presented to either eye. This results in the NMNs being more selective for rotation than the LPTCs. Thus, the neck motor system increases its rotation selectivity by a comparatively simple mechanism: the integration of binocular visual motion information. Public Library of Science 2008-07 2008-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2475543/ /pubmed/18651791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060173 Text en © 2008 Huston and Krapp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huston, Stephen J
Krapp, Holger G
Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System
title Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System
title_full Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System
title_fullStr Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System
title_full_unstemmed Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System
title_short Visuomotor Transformation in the Fly Gaze Stabilization System
title_sort visuomotor transformation in the fly gaze stabilization system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2475543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18651791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060173
work_keys_str_mv AT hustonstephenj visuomotortransformationintheflygazestabilizationsystem
AT krappholgerg visuomotortransformationintheflygazestabilizationsystem