Cargando…

Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking these syntheses are currently being developed. Thematic analysis is a method th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, James, Harden, Angela
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2478656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
_version_ 1782157611696652288
author Thomas, James
Harden, Angela
author_facet Thomas, James
Harden, Angela
author_sort Thomas, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking these syntheses are currently being developed. Thematic analysis is a method that is often used to analyse data in primary qualitative research. This paper reports on the use of this type of analysis in systematic reviews to bring together and integrate the findings of multiple qualitative studies. METHODS: We describe thematic synthesis, outline several steps for its conduct and illustrate the process and outcome of this approach using a completed review of health promotion research. Thematic synthesis has three stages: the coding of text 'line-by-line'; the development of 'descriptive themes'; and the generation of 'analytical themes'. While the development of descriptive themes remains 'close' to the primary studies, the analytical themes represent a stage of interpretation whereby the reviewers 'go beyond' the primary studies and generate new interpretive constructs, explanations or hypotheses. The use of computer software can facilitate this method of synthesis; detailed guidance is given on how this can be achieved. RESULTS: We used thematic synthesis to combine the studies of children's views and identified key themes to explore in the intervention studies. Most interventions were based in school and often combined learning about health benefits with 'hands-on' experience. The studies of children's views suggested that fruit and vegetables should be treated in different ways, and that messages should not focus on health warnings. Interventions that were in line with these suggestions tended to be more effective. Thematic synthesis enabled us to stay 'close' to the results of the primary studies, synthesising them in a transparent way, and facilitating the explicit production of new concepts and hypotheses. CONCLUSION: We compare thematic synthesis to other methods for the synthesis of qualitative research, discussing issues of context and rigour. Thematic synthesis is presented as a tried and tested method that preserves an explicit and transparent link between conclusions and the text of primary studies; as such it preserves principles that have traditionally been important to systematic reviewing.
format Text
id pubmed-2478656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24786562008-07-22 Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews Thomas, James Harden, Angela BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking these syntheses are currently being developed. Thematic analysis is a method that is often used to analyse data in primary qualitative research. This paper reports on the use of this type of analysis in systematic reviews to bring together and integrate the findings of multiple qualitative studies. METHODS: We describe thematic synthesis, outline several steps for its conduct and illustrate the process and outcome of this approach using a completed review of health promotion research. Thematic synthesis has three stages: the coding of text 'line-by-line'; the development of 'descriptive themes'; and the generation of 'analytical themes'. While the development of descriptive themes remains 'close' to the primary studies, the analytical themes represent a stage of interpretation whereby the reviewers 'go beyond' the primary studies and generate new interpretive constructs, explanations or hypotheses. The use of computer software can facilitate this method of synthesis; detailed guidance is given on how this can be achieved. RESULTS: We used thematic synthesis to combine the studies of children's views and identified key themes to explore in the intervention studies. Most interventions were based in school and often combined learning about health benefits with 'hands-on' experience. The studies of children's views suggested that fruit and vegetables should be treated in different ways, and that messages should not focus on health warnings. Interventions that were in line with these suggestions tended to be more effective. Thematic synthesis enabled us to stay 'close' to the results of the primary studies, synthesising them in a transparent way, and facilitating the explicit production of new concepts and hypotheses. CONCLUSION: We compare thematic synthesis to other methods for the synthesis of qualitative research, discussing issues of context and rigour. Thematic synthesis is presented as a tried and tested method that preserves an explicit and transparent link between conclusions and the text of primary studies; as such it preserves principles that have traditionally been important to systematic reviewing. BioMed Central 2008-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2478656/ /pubmed/18616818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 Text en Copyright © 2008 Thomas and Harden; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, James
Harden, Angela
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
title Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
title_full Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
title_fullStr Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
title_short Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
title_sort methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2478656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18616818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasjames methodsforthethematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearchinsystematicreviews
AT hardenangela methodsforthethematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearchinsystematicreviews