Cargando…

Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India

BACKGROUND: Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness provides valid estimates in a short period of time to assess the magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness. The study determined magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness in India in 2007 among the 50+ population. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Sixteen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neena, John, Rachel, Jose, Praveen, Vashist, Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2478719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002867
_version_ 1782157623440703488
author Neena, John
Rachel, Jose
Praveen, Vashist
Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S.
author_facet Neena, John
Rachel, Jose
Praveen, Vashist
Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S.
author_sort Neena, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness provides valid estimates in a short period of time to assess the magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness. The study determined magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness in India in 2007 among the 50+ population. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Sixteen randomly selected districts where blindness surveys were undertaken 7 to 10 years earlier were identified for a follow up survey. Stratified cluster sampling was used and 25 clusters (20 rural and 5 urban) were randomly picked in each district.. After a random start, 100 individuals aged 50+ were enumerated and examined sequentially in each cluster. All those with presenting vision <6/18 were dilated and examined by an ophthalmologist. 42722 individuals aged > = 50 years were enumerated, and 94.7% examined. Based on presenting vision,, 4.4% (95% Confidence Interval[CI]: 4.1,4.8) were severely visually impaired (vision<6/60 to 3/60 in the better eye) and 3.6% (95% CI: 3.3,3.9) were blind (vision<3/60 in the better eye). Prevalence of low vision (<6/18 to 6/60 in the better eye) was 16.8% (95% CI: 16.0,17.5). Prevalence of blindness and severe visual impairment (<6/60 in the better eye) was higher among rural residents (8.2%; 95% CI: 7.9,8.6) compared to urban (7.1%; 95% CI: 5.0, 9.2), among females (9.2%; 95% CI: 8.6,9.8) compared to males (6.5%; 95% CI: 6.0,7.1) and people above 70 years (20.6%; 95% CI: 19.1,22.0) compared to people aged 50–54 years (1.3%; 95% CI: 1.1,1.6). Of all blindness, 88.2% was avoidable. of which 81.9% was due to cataract and 7.1% to uncorrected refractive errors/uncorrected aphakia. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract and refractive errors are major causes of blindness and low vision and control strategies should prioritize them. Most blindness and low vision burden is avoidable.
format Text
id pubmed-2478719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-24787192008-08-06 Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India Neena, John Rachel, Jose Praveen, Vashist Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness provides valid estimates in a short period of time to assess the magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness. The study determined magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness in India in 2007 among the 50+ population. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Sixteen randomly selected districts where blindness surveys were undertaken 7 to 10 years earlier were identified for a follow up survey. Stratified cluster sampling was used and 25 clusters (20 rural and 5 urban) were randomly picked in each district.. After a random start, 100 individuals aged 50+ were enumerated and examined sequentially in each cluster. All those with presenting vision <6/18 were dilated and examined by an ophthalmologist. 42722 individuals aged > = 50 years were enumerated, and 94.7% examined. Based on presenting vision,, 4.4% (95% Confidence Interval[CI]: 4.1,4.8) were severely visually impaired (vision<6/60 to 3/60 in the better eye) and 3.6% (95% CI: 3.3,3.9) were blind (vision<3/60 in the better eye). Prevalence of low vision (<6/18 to 6/60 in the better eye) was 16.8% (95% CI: 16.0,17.5). Prevalence of blindness and severe visual impairment (<6/60 in the better eye) was higher among rural residents (8.2%; 95% CI: 7.9,8.6) compared to urban (7.1%; 95% CI: 5.0, 9.2), among females (9.2%; 95% CI: 8.6,9.8) compared to males (6.5%; 95% CI: 6.0,7.1) and people above 70 years (20.6%; 95% CI: 19.1,22.0) compared to people aged 50–54 years (1.3%; 95% CI: 1.1,1.6). Of all blindness, 88.2% was avoidable. of which 81.9% was due to cataract and 7.1% to uncorrected refractive errors/uncorrected aphakia. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract and refractive errors are major causes of blindness and low vision and control strategies should prioritize them. Most blindness and low vision burden is avoidable. Public Library of Science 2008-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2478719/ /pubmed/18682738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002867 Text en Neena et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neena, John
Rachel, Jose
Praveen, Vashist
Murthy, Gudlavalleti V. S.
Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India
title Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India
title_full Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India
title_fullStr Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India
title_short Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness in India
title_sort rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2478719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18682738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002867
work_keys_str_mv AT neenajohn rapidassessmentofavoidableblindnessinindia
AT racheljose rapidassessmentofavoidableblindnessinindia
AT praveenvashist rapidassessmentofavoidableblindnessinindia
AT murthygudlavalletivs rapidassessmentofavoidableblindnessinindia
AT rapidassessmentofavoidableblindnessinindia