Cargando…
Clinical risk stratification for gastrointestinal hemorrhage: still no consensus
A lack of consensus exists in the pre-endoscopic risk stratification of patients with upper or lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The work by Das and colleagues in the previous issue of Critical Care serves to externally validate the BLEED criteria. Their results suggest that hemodynamically stable...
Autores principales: | Wira, Charles, Sather, John |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2481453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18533048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc6900 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bleeding risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes. Is it still valid in the era of the radial approach?
por: Andó, Giuseppe, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited
por: Cecconi, Maurizio, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Consensus about managing gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?
por: Yeomans, Neville D
Publicado: (2015) -
Risk Stratification of Postoperative Dyspnoea: Is it Time to Change Practice?
por: Abah, Udo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Clinical decision rules for infectious risk stratification of children with febrile neutropenia: Are we looking for the Yeti?
por: Castagnola, Elio, et al.
Publicado: (2020)